The eyes of Texas are upon you
Comments
-
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
-
Godwin.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
-
The states broke the lawAOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Sounds like even you realize
The wonders of the pandemic. Fuck off -
Actually it's not, but the low education of yours continues to bite you in the ass. Doesn't mean the SC won't toss the Texas case as well but they are not the "same crap." You should have just said it would have been "fascist" for the Supreme Court to rule otherwise, that's the standard logic you usually bring to the table.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
-
The PA lawsuit was that the state violated the Constitution ("broke the law"). SCOTUS threw that out. In one sentence.RaceBannon said:
The states broke the lawAOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Sounds like even you realize
The wonders of the pandemic. Fuck off -
It’s cute how passionately the useful idiots argue in support of corruption on a football bored. You realize you’re the first ones sacrificed by your heroes if things go sideways
-
If?LoneStarDawg said:It’s cute how passionately the useful idiots argue in support of corruption on a football bored. You realize you’re the first ones sacrificed by your heroes if things go sideways
At this juncture looking more like when.
-
But in that one sentence, they didn't say they disagreed with the notion that PA violated election law. If that's not them admitting that PA violated election law by not saying that at all, I don't know what you want. Look for what they don't say instead of what they do say. The message is in the weeds. Are you clever enough to root them out?AOG said:
The PA lawsuit was that the state violated the Constitution ("broke the law"). SCOTUS threw that out. In one sentence.RaceBannon said:
The states broke the lawAOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Sounds like even you realize
The wonders of the pandemic. Fuck off -
It's exactly like insinceredawg put it. If SCOTUS says in one sentence "blah blah blah denied" PERIOD that means "FUCK OFF"MelloDawg said:
But in that one sentence, they didn't say they disagreed with the notion that PA violated election law. If that's not them admitting that PA violated election law by not saying that at all, I don't know what you want. Look for what they don't say instead of what they do say. The message is in the weeds. Are you clever enough to root them out?AOG said:
The PA lawsuit was that the state violated the Constitution ("broke the law"). SCOTUS threw that out. In one sentence.RaceBannon said:
The states broke the lawAOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Sounds like even you realize
The wonders of the pandemic. Fuck off -
LiarAOG said:Supreme Court threw out the PA case a moment ago
this was that crackpot "Frankenstein" case thrown out with prejudice by the local judge
-
SCOTUS did not throw it out. Fake News truly is the Enemy of the People. Look it how it makes a simpleton like @AOG thinks he’s smart when the reality is he’s embarrassing himself.AOG said:
The PA lawsuit was that the state violated the Constitution ("broke the law"). SCOTUS threw that out. In one sentence.RaceBannon said:
The states broke the lawAOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Sounds like even you realize
The wonders of the pandemic. Fuck off -
The injunction was denied meaning the judge did not think it would succeed. That sounds tantamount to throwing it out, "won't succeed."NorthwestFresh said:
SCOTUS did not throw it out. Fake News truly is the Enemy of the People. Look it how it makes a simpleton like @AOG thinks he’s smart when the reality is he’s embarrassing himself.AOG said:
The PA lawsuit was that the state violated the Constitution ("broke the law"). SCOTUS threw that out. In one sentence.RaceBannon said:
The states broke the lawAOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Sounds like even you realize
The wonders of the pandemic. Fuck off -
They want them all in the Supreme court. Who cares about states. This is how you get there. Where exactly did you go to school? You don't know shit.AOG said:Supreme Court threw out the PA case a moment ago
this was that crackpot "Frankenstein" case thrown out with prejudice by the local judge -
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
-
If you start talking about Pennsylvania in the Texas thread its a tell
There is a process to change election laws and it isn't done by one man rule
Texas has standing because a federal election effects us all
They probably won't hear it but your deflection and bullshit speaks volumes -
-
-
SECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSledog said: -
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgmentsSledog said:
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
-
IncredibleAOG said:
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgmentsSledog said:
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
-
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).RaceBannon said:
IncredibleAOG said:
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgmentsSledog said:
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
-
There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.AOG said:
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).RaceBannon said:
IncredibleAOG said:
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgmentsSledog said:
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker. -
The Texas AG is facing federal securities fraud charges. The lawsuit is nuts. It’s pretty obvious what he’s after. He’s corrupt as fuck.
-
Hes a titanic piece of shit. Lmfao at this clown showHHusky said:The Texas AG is facing federal securities fraud charges. The lawsuit is nuts. It’s pretty obvious what he’s after. He’s corrupt as fuck.
-
You really are stupid.AOG said:
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).RaceBannon said:
IncredibleAOG said:
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgmentsSledog said:
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
-
Slavery isn't the issue dumbassAOG said:
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).RaceBannon said:
IncredibleAOG said:
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgmentsSledog said:
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
You used the pandemic as an excuse to trash the constitution
They teach that at Central? -
Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.SFGbob said:
There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.AOG said:
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).RaceBannon said:
IncredibleAOG said:
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgmentsSledog said:
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker. -
There is no pandemic.AOG said:
Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.SFGbob said:
There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.AOG said:
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).RaceBannon said:
IncredibleAOG said:
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgmentsSledog said:
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker. -
Now do the other 8 states suingHHusky said:The Texas AG is facing federal securities fraud charges. The lawsuit is nuts. It’s pretty obvious what he’s after. He’s corrupt as fuck.
-
I’d say their belief in the cause is almost as high minded as Ken Paxton’s.RaceBannon said:
Now do the other 8 states suingHHusky said:The Texas AG is facing federal securities fraud charges. The lawsuit is nuts. It’s pretty obvious what he’s after. He’s corrupt as fuck.
