Most of you have kind of incomplete minds. You are white guys that didn't go or couldn't complete college. You believe things like COVID-19 is like the regular flu, climate change is a hoax, Trump won. All I can do is tell you to look at the facts, but you go by "feel" -- not what the facts of the situation dictate.
"climate change is a hoax" So, braniac - to fix the climate what should we do and how much will it cost? Flail away. The US is leading the world in CO2 reduction while the chicoms are leading the world in increased CO2 production. IF you leftards were truly interested in decreasing CO2 production you would support nukes and fracking and exporting LNG to China creating even more great jobs for the Americans you seem to despise. But you are never serious and believe we can harness some magical unicorn farts and voila.
this was that crackpot "Frankenstein" case thrown out with prejudice by the local judge
Which has nothing to do with the Texas case that was referenced to start this thread but I wouldn't expect someone with a low education level to know that.
this was that crackpot "Frankenstein" case thrown out with prejudice by the local judge
Which has nothing to do with the Texas case that was referenced to start this thread but I wouldn't expect someone with a low education level to know that.
The Texas case is even more crackpot than this one
this was that crackpot "Frankenstein" case thrown out with prejudice by the local judge
Which has nothing to do with the Texas case that was referenced to start this thread but I wouldn't expect someone with a low education level to know that.
The Texas case is even more crackpot than this one
Could be, still doesn't refute the fact that you had your head up your ass.
Most of you have kind of incomplete minds. You are white guys that didn't go or couldn't complete college. You believe things like COVID-19 is like the regular flu, climate change is a hoax, Trump won. All I can do is tell you to look at the facts, but you go by "feel" -- not what the facts of the situation dictate.
I believe that you believe this is what conservatives believe.
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Most of you have kind of incomplete minds. You are white guys that didn't go or couldn't complete college. You believe things like COVID-19 is like the regular flu, climate change is a hoax, Trump won. All I can do is tell you to look at the facts, but you go by "feel" -- not what the facts of the situation dictate.
I believe that you believe this is what conservatives believe.
this was that crackpot "Frankenstein" case thrown out with prejudice by the local judge
Which has nothing to do with the Texas case that was referenced to start this thread but I wouldn't expect someone with a low education level to know that.
The Texas case is even more crackpot than this one
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
Actually it's not, but the low education of yours continues to bite you in the ass. Doesn't mean the SC won't toss the Texas case as well but they are not the "same crap." You should have just said it would have been "fascist" for the Supreme Court to rule otherwise, that's the standard logic you usually bring to the table.
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
The states broke the law
Sounds like even you realize
The wonders of the pandemic. Fuck off
The PA lawsuit was that the state violated the Constitution ("broke the law"). SCOTUS threw that out. In one sentence.
It’s cute how passionately the useful idiots argue in support of corruption on a football bored. You realize you’re the first ones sacrificed by your heroes if things go sideways
It’s cute how passionately the useful idiots argue in support of corruption on a football bored. You realize you’re the first ones sacrificed by your heroes if things go sideways
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
The states broke the law
Sounds like even you realize
The wonders of the pandemic. Fuck off
The PA lawsuit was that the state violated the Constitution ("broke the law"). SCOTUS threw that out. In one sentence.
But in that one sentence, they didn't say they disagreed with the notion that PA violated election law. If that's not them admitting that PA violated election law by not saying that at all, I don't know what you want. Look for what they don't say instead of what they do say. The message is in the weeds. Are you clever enough to root them out?
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
The states broke the law
Sounds like even you realize
The wonders of the pandemic. Fuck off
The PA lawsuit was that the state violated the Constitution ("broke the law"). SCOTUS threw that out. In one sentence.
But in that one sentence, they didn't say they disagreed with the notion that PA violated election law. If that's not them admitting that PA violated election law by not saying that at all, I don't know what you want. Look for what they don't say instead of what they do say. The message is in the weeds. Are you clever enough to root them out?
It's exactly like insinceredawg put it. If SCOTUS says in one sentence "blah blah blah denied" PERIOD that means "FUCK OFF"
Comments
this was that crackpot "Frankenstein" case thrown out with prejudice by the local judge
Sounds like even you realize
The wonders of the pandemic. Fuck off
At this juncture looking more like when.