Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The eyes of Texas are upon you

1…5791011

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,556 Founders Club
    I'd say you're full of shit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,339
    RaceBannon said:

    I'd say you're full of shit

    Disagree
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,556 Founders Club
    I asked around

    Didn't go well for you
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,916 Standard Supporter
    The dazzler is all in on corruption that allows him to fleece his pitiful clients.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.

    Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
    Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
    If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
    Incredible
    Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
    There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.

    For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
    How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,840
    edited December 2020
    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.

    Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
    Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
    If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
    Incredible
    Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
    There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.

    For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
    How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
    You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,556 Standard Supporter
    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.

    Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
    Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
    If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
    Incredible
    Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
    There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.

    For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
    How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
    You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
    Godwin
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,556 Founders Club
    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.

    Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
    Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
    If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
    Incredible
    Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
    There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.

    For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
    How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
    You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
    Meltdown
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,264 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.

    Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
    Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
    If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
    Incredible
    Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
    There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.

    For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
    How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
    You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
    Meltdown
    AOG Getting dumber with every post.

    Trump apparently now has the whole Republican Party behind him, that would be new news.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DawgFader
    DawgFader Member Posts: 1,414

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter