FBI Has FINALLY Begun Investigating Voter Fraud, Democrats Underestimating Trump Is Their Undoing
Comments
-
Your aaarghs are not the same without the Hulk. Please bring him back, for emphasis.PurpleThrobber said:
Have watched them both.TurdBomber said:Anybody watch the hearings in AZ or PA? Cluster-Fuckery of the highest order.
How the fuck can anyone have any confidence in the integrity of the vote in those two states? Unimaginable incompetence.
Actually put in the work to examine the testimony instead of knee jerking straight to AAARGH MEAN ORANGE MAN like most of the leftist clowns who haven't done shit educating themselves.
Because, well, AAARRGH MEAN ORANGE MAN!! -
-
It's the same old, same old, where Dems want to allow anyone to vote anywhere and just give any and all the benefit of the doubt that no malarkey will happen despite few, if any, safeguards or consequences, whereas the Reps want the process to be more secure to prohibit and deter illegal voting.HustlinOwl said:
This is a thought I can get behind. I do not believe the massive conspiracy of voter fraud and a coup. I do believe the COVID made changes to encourage mail in voting that states weren't prepared to handle properly.TurdBomber said:Anybody watch the hearings in AZ or PA? Cluster-Fuckery of the highest order.
How the fuck can anyone have any confidence in the integrity of the vote in those two states? Unimaginable incompetence.
The Narrative in the MSM will always be the same: Dems want more participation, while Reps want to suppress the vote.
Been hearing this shit my entire life. You'd think, by 2020, with cameras, iPhones, bar codes, RFID tags, etc., we'd have this shit dialed in. But no. -
I'm sticking with my earlier position, regardless. Any party that would fraudulently fabricate a Russian Conspiracy, lie under oath in affidavits, alter and tamper with evidence before a federal FISA court, and vote to impeach a properly elected sitting president on false, fraudulent grounds, would certainly throw an election if given the opportunity.
And that's what you Libs have to live with: You voted for the criminal party. -
Yep. I didn't vote for Trump as he smelled worse to me than Hillary though not by much.jecornel said:
Was 2016 legit in your mind?angus said:Yep, FBI is on it! Timcast breaking news and cashing in on on those of you still in denial and clicking on another Trumpster FOS. Really looking forward to the
EPIC reveals such fine journalists will bring to the table soon. GFY's -
I’m still waiting for someone to tell me why all voting shouldn’t be done in person with identification cards.
If your vote matters to you, you’ll show up, flash ID, and drop it off. If it doesn’t matter to you, you won’t.
And if it doesn’t matter to you, it shouldn’t matter to the rest of us who actually care about the outcome.
We should be restricting absentee ballots. We should be doing away with mail-in voting, which only promotes participation from the unengaged at best, and paves the way for fraud, at worst.
What’s next? Online voting, via an app? I mean get the fuck outta here. We are talking about 1hr out of one day every 4 years. If you can’t be bothered to be there and participate, FUCK OFF.
Let those of us who care make the decisions for you. -
Make it a holiday, go vote then get drunk simple as thatthechatch said:I’m still waiting for someone to tell me why all voting shouldn’t be done in person with identification cards.
If your vote matters to you, you’ll show up, flash ID, and drop it off. If it doesn’t matter to you, you won’t.
And if it doesn’t matter to you, it shouldn’t matter to the rest of us who actually care about the outcome.
We should be restricting absentee ballots. We should be doing away with mail-in voting, which only promotes participation from the unengaged at best, and paves the way for fraud, at worst.
What’s next? Online voting, via an app? I mean get the fuck outta here. We are talking about 1hr out of one day every 4 years. If you can’t be bothered to be there and participate, FUCK OFF.
Let those of us who care make the decisions for you. -
Or just have federal election laws that govern the process for national elections. State and local can do whatever they like.
-
Toss in willingly smear someone as a gang rapist all with zero evidence to support it in order to keep them off the Supreme Court. The Rats have shown us over and over again that the have no shame and no integrity.TurdBomber said:I'm sticking with my earlier position, regardless. Any party that would fraudulently fabricate a Russian Conspiracy, lie under oath in affidavits, alter and tamper with evidence before a federal FISA court, and vote to impeach a properly elected sitting president on false, fraudulent grounds, would certainly throw an election if given the opportunity.
And that's what you Libs have to live with: You voted for the criminal party. -
They certainly hate the idea of Due Process, which is a cornerstone of our Constitution.SFGbob said:
Toss in willingly smear someone as a gang rapist all with zero evidence to support it in order to keep them off the Supreme Court. The Rats have shown us over and over again that the have no shame and no integrity.TurdBomber said:I'm sticking with my earlier position, regardless. Any party that would fraudulently fabricate a Russian Conspiracy, lie under oath in affidavits, alter and tamper with evidence before a federal FISA court, and vote to impeach a properly elected sitting president on false, fraudulent grounds, would certainly throw an election if given the opportunity.
And that's what you Libs have to live with: You voted for the criminal party.
Fuck Obama in both ears for setting up illegal, unconstitutional kangaroo courts at colleges across the land to convict and expel supposed "sexual assault" perpetrators without allowing the accused to confront, cross examine, or even question the alleged victims.
Want grounds for Impeachment? That shit alone would suffice. But nooooooooo. Instead we get zero evidence, spying on opposing campaigns - worse than Watergate - and criminals like Comey, McCabe and Adam Schiff, all of whom should be behind bars, right now. -
What about the mass ballots dumps?
-
jecornel said:
What about the
mass ballots dumpsKurds? -
*cricketsjecornel said:What about the mass ballots dumps?
-
Our lefties only have confidence in cheating since they know they couldn't win. Having no morals our resident lefties are good with it as they're hoping for handouts of someone else's money and an end to America.TurdBomber said:Anybody watch the hearings in AZ or PA? Cluster-Fuckery of the highest order.
How the fuck can anyone have any confidence in the integrity of the vote in those two states? Unimaginable incompetence. -
They preach, and unfortunately, teach submissive behavior and participating trophies. This should not be a surprise.
It’s on us for not getting in front of it. -
Whenever in doubt......but, but, but the Kurds!!!PurpleThrobber said:jecornel said:What about the
mass ballots dumpsKurds? -
Why so much concern over ballot dumps that include 577,000 votes for Biden and only 3200 for Trump?
I mean, Biden has Scranton roots, so who could be more popular in PA, aside from John Updike, of course?
Hall & Oates, maybe? -
Reading the Trump Tards in these posts would serve historians well if the want to know the frame of mind of the Neanderthals as they died out in Europe.
-
It's a fucking statistical anomaly this clown has 561 consecutive posts of "uhhhh....trump tards.....uhhhhh....trump tards".MontlakeBridgeTroll said:Reading the Trump Tards in these posts would serve historians well if the want to know the frame of mind of the Neanderthals as they died out in Europe.
Model of consistency.
-
“Someone please explain how one candidate received 99.5% of the votes only in key districts within swing states in the middle of the night on ED, after the other candidate had built a commanding lead”MontlakeBridgeTroll said:Reading the Trump Tards in these posts would serve historians well if the want to know the frame of mind of the Neanderthals as they died out in Europe.
“Huuuuuuurrrrrrr duuuuuurrrrrr Trump Tards!!!!!”
Literally how this conversation is going right now.
Fascinating, really. -
Are you sure that's true or just "Read on Internet somewhere"?TurdBomber said:Why so much concern over ballot dumps that include 577,000 votes for Biden and only 3200 for Trump?
I mean, Biden has Scranton roots, so who could be more popular in PA, aside from John Updike, of course?
Hall & Oates, maybe? -
Reading the lefts would clue you into the next Hitlers, Stalin's etc.MontlakeBridgeTroll said:Reading the Trump Tards in these posts would serve historians well if the want to know the frame of mind of the Neanderthals as they died out in Europe.
-
It's testimony in the hearing in Gettysburg if you actually took some time to educate yourself.HustlinOwl said:
Are you sure that's true or just "Read on Internet somewhere"?TurdBomber said:Why so much concern over ballot dumps that include 577,000 votes for Biden and only 3200 for Trump?
I mean, Biden has Scranton roots, so who could be more popular in PA, aside from John Updike, of course?
Hall & Oates, maybe?
D'uuuuurrrrr MEAN ORANGE MAN!!!!
-
Some of us have jobs.PurpleThrobber said:
It's testimony in the hearing in Gettysburg if you actually took some time to educate yourself.HustlinOwl said:
Are you sure that's true or just "Read on Internet somewhere"?TurdBomber said:Why so much concern over ballot dumps that include 577,000 votes for Biden and only 3200 for Trump?
I mean, Biden has Scranton roots, so who could be more popular in PA, aside from John Updike, of course?
Hall & Oates, maybe?
D'uuuuurrrrr MEAN ORANGE MAN!!!! -
Most, if not all of us have jobs, you snivelling little shit.HustlinOwl said:
Some of us have jobs.PurpleThrobber said:
It's testimony in the hearing in Gettysburg if you actually took some time to educate yourself.HustlinOwl said:
Are you sure that's true or just "Read on Internet somewhere"?TurdBomber said:Why so much concern over ballot dumps that include 577,000 votes for Biden and only 3200 for Trump?
I mean, Biden has Scranton roots, so who could be more popular in PA, aside from John Updike, of course?
Hall & Oates, maybe?
D'uuuuurrrrr MEAN ORANGE MAN!!!! -
Some of us own companies.HustlinOwl said:
Some of us have jobs.PurpleThrobber said:
It's testimony in the hearing in Gettysburg if you actually took some time to educate yourself.HustlinOwl said:
Are you sure that's true or just "Read on Internet somewhere"?TurdBomber said:Why so much concern over ballot dumps that include 577,000 votes for Biden and only 3200 for Trump?
I mean, Biden has Scranton roots, so who could be more popular in PA, aside from John Updike, of course?
Hall & Oates, maybe?
D'uuuuurrrrr MEAN ORANGE MAN!!!!
Get back to work.
-
Would it make more sense to deliver them Uber style one at a time from where they've been stored the last couple of months or wait until the polls closed and deliver them all at once?jecornel said:What about the mass ballots dumps?
-
It would be sad, but understandable to learn that @MontlakeBridgeTroll blew Don Lemon from CNN.
But the fact that @MontlakeBridgeTroll actually blew Brian Stelter of CNN is just disgusting. Yuck. -
This isn’t getting anywhere near the SCOTUS.thechatch said:All you have to do is ask yourself where your head would be if the roles were reversed.
If Joe Biden had a commanding lead in every battleground state late in the evening and GOP-controlled election sites somehow simultaneously decided to announce that they were going to stop counting votes and then the following morning 100s of thousands of votes suddenly appear on the rolls with districts reporting 96% participation rates and 99% for Trump to take the lead and this activity was confined only to those battleground states....
What would you be thinking?
And that’s only part of the story, to say nothing of election monitors being refused entry to these counting sites, and the vast majority of the news outlets refusing to seriously cover these statistical anomalies, while the opposition taunts and laughs.
If you cannot see the problem here, even after putting yourself through this very simple mental exercise, I don’t really know what to say to you.
This was always going to head to the SCOTUS.
LIPO.
IPO -
Bummer. I’m bummed out. Not sure how I’ll live after this.TurdBomber said:I'm sticking with my earlier position, regardless. Any party that would fraudulently fabricate a Russian Conspiracy, lie under oath in affidavits, alter and tamper with evidence before a federal FISA court, and vote to impeach a properly elected sitting president on false, fraudulent grounds, would certainly throw an election if given the opportunity.
And that's what you Libs have to live with: You voted for the criminal party.
