Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Morris looks fine to me

124

Comments

  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    I’m on board. I already like Donovan and Jimmy’s offensive scheme better than Pete’s too.
    Against the capybaras it looked pretty shitty
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    FireCohen said:

    Against the capybaras it looked pretty shitty
    That should be as conservative as you ever see it again
  • Edwin_BambinoEdwin_Bambino Member Posts: 2,944

    I’m on board. I already like Donovan and Jimmy’s offensive scheme better than Pete’s too.
    Just the fact that there aren’t a million pre snap motions make me like it
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,546 Swaye's Wigwam

    When I watched the highlights we were doing kind of shitty when we pulled. Ale has a hard time getting there quick enough.
    I would like to see someone a little more nimble on the outside runs where Ale was the lead. I think he gets there OK but it's hard to be an effective blocker when you're running that hard just to get there. As it is he's basically a big, scary human running toward the defense and forcing them to dodge. He's not real hard for a LB or DB to dodge though.
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,925
    FireCohen said:

    Against the capybaras it looked pretty shitty
    10-15 mph winds in a downpour will do that
  • Kingdome_UrinalsKingdome_Urinals Member Posts: 2,773

    This. I mentioned it a few times over the last year or two, but there was mention that Huff hated Pete’s run blocking schemes and felt it led to blown assignments.

    And that’s exactly what we saw. Game after game.

    This year the run blocking schemes are simpler and the line is killing it. Great protection and pockets. Great push. Just locking guys up. And that’s with 3 new starters.

    Love to see it.
    I dare anyone to rewatch film of last year's offense. It looks so horrible. What we are doing now scheme/personnel is just way better.
  • dirtysouwfdawgdirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,853 Swaye's Wigwam

    I'll start worrying more the first time Morris sacks himself, a la Brownsox.

    Won’t happen because it’s not Pete’s paralysis by over analysis offense.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    edited November 2020
    chuck said:

    14-24 for 140, including multiple drops that threw away points or at least first downs, on a shitty night where you ran for 270 yards, doesn't look shitty for the scheme or the play caller.
    idk maybe i can't handle the ups and downs of this board. caz last week i can remember people wanting jimmy fired at the 50 yards line
  • doogvilledoogville Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,223 Swaye's Wigwam
    chuck said:

    14-24 for 140, including multiple drops that threw away points or at least first downs, on a shitty night where you ran for 270 yards, doesn't look shitty for the scheme or the play caller.
    We scored 3 pts in the second half.

    I’m loving the AZ win as much as everyone else, but let’s not rewrite history after 1 game. Offense looked awesome on Saturday (owing a lot to the fact that we actually threw the ball). Offense looked stale and outdated against the beav. It is what it is.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,546 Swaye's Wigwam
    FireCohen said:

    idk maybe i can't handle the ups and downs of this board. caz last week i can remember people wanting jimmy fired at the 50 yards line
    Bi-polar is a hell of a drug.

    I wasn't one if the critics but I got it then and still do. Most of them were just reacting to a surprisingly scary game against pretty weak competition. There were some mitigating factors worth considering that few here were in the mood to consider at the time.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,546 Swaye's Wigwam
    doogville said:

    We scored 3 pts in the second half.

    I’m loving the AZ win as much as everyone else, but let’s not rewrite history after 1 game. Offense looked awesome on Saturday (owing a lot to the fact that we actually threw the ball). Offense looked stale and outdated against the beav. It is what it is.
    Rewrite history? Huh?

    270 yards rushing and 140 passing is decent output regardless of what you think you saw. When you factor in that the best defense for the beav was dropped pass, it was a wet, windy, night game and game one for a freshman QB behind a mostly new OL it looks a little better. It didn't look great, and the passing numbers leave a little to be desired, but arguing in hindsight that it was a bad first outing for the scheme seems dumb.
  • doogvilledoogville Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,223 Swaye's Wigwam
    chuck said:

    Rewrite history? Huh?

    270 yards rushing and 140 passing is decent output regardless of what you think you saw. When you factor in that the best defense for the beav was dropped pass, it was a wet, windy, night game and game one for a freshman QB behind a mostly new OL it looks a little better. It didn't look great, and the passing numbers leave a little to be desired, but arguing in hindsight that it was a bad first outing for the scheme seems dumb.
    Except 140 yards passing isn’t decent, and you know that. We can ascribe a bunch of factors as to why the playcalling/scheme left a lot to be desired against OSU (new qb, rain, etc), but it doesn’t change the result on the field. The scheme yielded a whopping 5.9 yards per pass attempt. That’s not good. (And OSU is one of the worst teams in the conference). Why do we have to now act like that was a good performance?

    Thankfully, they opened up the playbook against AZ and things looked great. I expect we see a lot more of that going forward, in terms of run/pass, pushing the ball downfield, trying to hit explosive plays, etc. Which is great! The offense we saw on Saturday (albeit also against a crappy opponent) is capable of winning the conference.
Sign In or Register to comment.