Interesting things in Georgia...
Some interesting nuggets...
Comments
-
Georgia is headed for a full, county by county Hand recount.
-
Purdue could get out of a runoff potentially with a recount as well I presume?
-
It's not going to change anything.
-
Could mean the GOP holds the Senate without a runoff but other than that? Sure.dnc said:It's not going to change anything.
-
-
Obama will be on 60 Minutes while Joe returns to the basement
-
Maybe only for presidential race.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Could mean the GOP holds the Senate without a runoff but other than that? Sure.dnc said:It's not going to change anything.
https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2020/11/11/breaking-georgia-secstate-orders-full-hand-recount/ -
Recount probably won’t unless there is something to the Dominion vote switches.dnc said:It's not going to change anything.
An audit of the ballots where they track down the single vote people and find out if they exist and did actually request/receive/return a ballot with only a vote for President I think will dig up all sorts of crazy things. 100k of those only for Biden makes zero sense.
I also don’t know if an audit matches up votes...ie if somebody mailed in a ballot and then went in person to vote...bet that happened on both sides. Normally it would show up with observers counting absentee ballots but since there was none allowed in Fulton I bet a good chunk of those votes made it through. -
Anyone want to explain this anomaly in GA? Wouldn’t you also vote for the Rat Senate candidates to flip the Senate that enabled the “Nazi?”
-
How can that be done in a secret ballot?HoustonHusky said:
Recount probably won’t unless there is something to the Dominion vote switches.dnc said:It's not going to change anything.
An audit of the ballots where they track down the single vote people and find out if they exist and did actually request/receive/return a ballot with only a vote for President I think will dig up all sorts of crazy things. 100k of those only for Biden makes zero sense.
I also don’t know if an audit matches up votes...ie if somebody mailed in a ballot and then went in person to vote...bet that happened on both sides. Normally it would show up with observers counting absentee ballots but since there was none allowed in Fulton I bet a good chunk of those votes made it through. -
Looks weird at first blush. But I can easily imagine that level of beat Trump, nothing else matters.NorthwestFresh said:Anyone want to explain this anomaly in GA? Wouldn’t you also vote for the Rat Senate candidates to flip the Senate that enabled the “Nazi?”
-
MemoriesGrundleStiltzkin said:
How can that be done in a secret ballot?HoustonHusky said:
Recount probably won’t unless there is something to the Dominion vote switches.dnc said:It's not going to change anything.
An audit of the ballots where they track down the single vote people and find out if they exist and did actually request/receive/return a ballot with only a vote for President I think will dig up all sorts of crazy things. 100k of those only for Biden makes zero sense.
I also don’t know if an audit matches up votes...ie if somebody mailed in a ballot and then went in person to vote...bet that happened on both sides. Normally it would show up with observers counting absentee ballots but since there was none allowed in Fulton I bet a good chunk of those votes made it through.
Back in the day of in person voting and one of my first times, the person who took my ballot and tore the number tag off of it and the number matches where I signed to get the ballot
I asked the same question - this isn't a secret ballot if you can track me to it
And out the door I went without any explanation forthcoming -
Accountability!!!RaceBannon said:
MemoriesGrundleStiltzkin said:
How can that be done in a secret ballot?HoustonHusky said:
Recount probably won’t unless there is something to the Dominion vote switches.dnc said:It's not going to change anything.
An audit of the ballots where they track down the single vote people and find out if they exist and did actually request/receive/return a ballot with only a vote for President I think will dig up all sorts of crazy things. 100k of those only for Biden makes zero sense.
I also don’t know if an audit matches up votes...ie if somebody mailed in a ballot and then went in person to vote...bet that happened on both sides. Normally it would show up with observers counting absentee ballots but since there was none allowed in Fulton I bet a good chunk of those votes made it through.
Back in the day of in person voting and one of my first times, the person who took my ballot and tore the number tag off of it and the number matches where I signed to get the ballot
I asked the same question - this isn't a secret ballot if you can track me to it
And out the door I went without any explanation forthcoming -
That would be a trend across the country. GA just added an audit to the recount. Fulton County election leaders should probably start lawyering up now.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Looks weird at first blush. But I can easily imagine that level of beat Trump, nothing else matters.NorthwestFresh said:Anyone want to explain this anomaly in GA? Wouldn’t you also vote for the Rat Senate candidates to flip the Senate that enabled the “Nazi?”
-
You mean you're not buying the water main break story that necessitated halting the vote count?NorthwestFresh said:
That would be a trend across the country. GA just added an audit to the recount. Fulton County election leaders should probably start lawyering up now.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Looks weird at first blush. But I can easily imagine that level of beat Trump, nothing else matters.NorthwestFresh said:Anyone want to explain this anomaly in GA? Wouldn’t you also vote for the Rat Senate candidates to flip the Senate that enabled the “Nazi?”
-
This...the Biden-only votes only show up in these few crazy states and Virginia...every other state they are nominal and about equal to Trump-only votes. If you look at Virginia under the hood it looks like a ton of fraud happened that nobody is talking about yet.NorthwestFresh said:
That would be a trend across the country. GA just added an audit to the recount. Fulton County election leaders should probably start lawyering up now.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Looks weird at first blush. But I can easily imagine that level of beat Trump, nothing else matters.NorthwestFresh said:Anyone want to explain this anomaly in GA? Wouldn’t you also vote for the Rat Senate candidates to flip the Senate that enabled the “Nazi?”
-
-
So, let's say a miracle hail mary happens, and Trump wins Georgia, where does that put him? He would still need a couple other big flips wouldn't he? I'm all for trying to untangle all this and get an actual FAIR election, but it still seems a bridge too far for me. Perhaps I am too jaded at how corrupt our entire government and media establishment is to actually believe this will all be fixed on a grand scale. Georgia sure. Favorable political environment. Michigan? PA? Wiscy? Super fucking unlikely because the entire apparatus you are up against, both political and legal, is democrat controlled.
-
Georgia flips and it’s a new ball game. Basically any combination of any two other states as long as it’s not just Nevada and Arizona or Nevada and Wisconsin. I think I did my math right there.
-
If it’s a thousand and it even flips the state to trump then probably not much would happen. If they find a serious error, all bets are off and those DNC states would have a hard time saying no to the process.Swaye said:So, let's say a miracle hail mary happens, and Trump wins Georgia, where does that put him? He would still need a couple other big flips wouldn't he? I'm all for trying to untangle all this and get an actual FAIR election, but it still seems a bridge too far for me. Perhaps I am too jaded at how corrupt our entire government and media establishment is to actually believe this will all be fixed on a grand scale. Georgia sure. Favorable political environment. Michigan? PA? Wiscy? Super fucking unlikely because the entire apparatus you are up against, both political and legal, is democrat controlled.
Either way it’s interesting -
At this point the best we can hope for is that this kills vote by mail going forward. In person voting with a photo ID. If you can't make it to the polls you have to request an absentee ballot prior to the election. This bullshit about sending out ballots to everyone on the rolls has to be killed.Swaye said:So, let's say a miracle hail mary happens, and Trump wins Georgia, where does that put him? He would still need a couple other big flips wouldn't he? I'm all for trying to untangle all this and get an actual FAIR election, but it still seems a bridge too far for me. Perhaps I am too jaded at how corrupt our entire government and media establishment is to actually believe this will all be fixed on a grand scale. Georgia sure. Favorable political environment. Michigan? PA? Wiscy? Super fucking unlikely because the entire apparatus you are up against, both political and legal, is democrat controlled.
-
That and a full audit and purge/reset of the rollsSFGbob said:
At this point the best we can hope for is that this kills vote by mail going forward. In person voting with a photo ID. If you can't make it to the polls you have to request an absentee ballot prior to the election. This bullshit about sending out ballots to everyone on the rolls has to be killed.Swaye said:So, let's say a miracle hail mary happens, and Trump wins Georgia, where does that put him? He would still need a couple other big flips wouldn't he? I'm all for trying to untangle all this and get an actual FAIR election, but it still seems a bridge too far for me. Perhaps I am too jaded at how corrupt our entire government and media establishment is to actually believe this will all be fixed on a grand scale. Georgia sure. Favorable political environment. Michigan? PA? Wiscy? Super fucking unlikely because the entire apparatus you are up against, both political and legal, is democrat controlled.
-
“Election integrity” needs to be more than a just a title of a mid level admin hiding in an officeBob_C said:
That and a full audit and purge/reset of the rollsSFGbob said:
At this point the best we can hope for is that this kills vote by mail going forward. In person voting with a photo ID. If you can't make it to the polls you have to request an absentee ballot prior to the election. This bullshit about sending out ballots to everyone on the rolls has to be killed.Swaye said:So, let's say a miracle hail mary happens, and Trump wins Georgia, where does that put him? He would still need a couple other big flips wouldn't he? I'm all for trying to untangle all this and get an actual FAIR election, but it still seems a bridge too far for me. Perhaps I am too jaded at how corrupt our entire government and media establishment is to actually believe this will all be fixed on a grand scale. Georgia sure. Favorable political environment. Michigan? PA? Wiscy? Super fucking unlikely because the entire apparatus you are up against, both political and legal, is democrat controlled.
-
Trump is at 217.Bob_C said:Georgia flips and it’s a new ball game. Basically any combination of any two other states as long as it’s not just Nevada and Arizona or Nevada and Wisconsin. I think I did my math right there.
Georgia (16), PA (20), Wiscy (10 - I like to call it that), and AZ (11) are needed for a win. Swap NV (6) for AZ and you have a tie, but the R's get the tie-breaker and Trump is in. Michigan (16) is too far out of reach.
This is not going to happen in case people are still holding out on that delusion. -
North Carolina isn’t in the 217, so it’s less than what you described. But yes it isn’t happeneing.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Trump is at 217.Bob_C said:Georgia flips and it’s a new ball game. Basically any combination of any two other states as long as it’s not just Nevada and Arizona or Nevada and Wisconsin. I think I did my math right there.
Georgia (16), PA (20), Wiscy (10 - I like to call it that), and AZ (11) are needed for a win. Swap NV (6) for AZ and you have a tie, but the R's get the tie-breaker and Trump is in. Michigan (16) is too far out of reach.
This is not going to happen in case people are still holding out on that delusion. -
Unless they can prove beyond a shadow of doubt that the software really did flip and or not count votes for Trump this isn't going to happen. Other than that you're never going to be able to prove that there was enough fraud to flip the election. Mail in ballots made provable fraud unnecessary.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Trump is at 217.Bob_C said:Georgia flips and it’s a new ball game. Basically any combination of any two other states as long as it’s not just Nevada and Arizona or Nevada and Wisconsin. I think I did my math right there.
Georgia (16), PA (20), Wiscy (10 - I like to call it that), and AZ (11) are needed for a win. Swap NV (6) for AZ and you have a tie, but the R's get the tie-breaker and Trump is in. Michigan (16) is too far out of reach.
This is not going to happen in case people are still holding out on that delusion. -
I'd take Trump losing the election if it meant going forward we could get rid of the bullshit regarding the voting rolls. There needs to be a hard and fast standard for cleaning up the voting rolls. The fact that some states have lax standards while other do a pretty good job of keeping their rolls updated is bullshit.LoneStarDawg said:
“Election integrity” needs to be more than a just a title of a mid level admin hiding in an officeBob_C said:
That and a full audit and purge/reset of the rollsSFGbob said:
At this point the best we can hope for is that this kills vote by mail going forward. In person voting with a photo ID. If you can't make it to the polls you have to request an absentee ballot prior to the election. This bullshit about sending out ballots to everyone on the rolls has to be killed.Swaye said:So, let's say a miracle hail mary happens, and Trump wins Georgia, where does that put him? He would still need a couple other big flips wouldn't he? I'm all for trying to untangle all this and get an actual FAIR election, but it still seems a bridge too far for me. Perhaps I am too jaded at how corrupt our entire government and media establishment is to actually believe this will all be fixed on a grand scale. Georgia sure. Favorable political environment. Michigan? PA? Wiscy? Super fucking unlikely because the entire apparatus you are up against, both political and legal, is democrat controlled.
-
EWIWon'tBIBob_C said:
North Carolina isn’t in the 217, so it’s less than what you described. But yes it isn’t happeneing.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Trump is at 217.Bob_C said:Georgia flips and it’s a new ball game. Basically any combination of any two other states as long as it’s not just Nevada and Arizona or Nevada and Wisconsin. I think I did my math right there.
Georgia (16), PA (20), Wiscy (10 - I like to call it that), and AZ (11) are needed for a win. Swap NV (6) for AZ and you have a tie, but the R's get the tie-breaker and Trump is in. Michigan (16) is too far out of reach.
This is not going to happen in case people are still holding out on that delusion. -
Not if the demonRats have anything to say about it. That and amnestyand we'll never see another republican elected.SFGbob said:
At this point the best we can hope for is that this kills vote by mail going forward. In person voting with a photo ID. If you can't make it to the polls you have to request an absentee ballot prior to the election. This bullshit about sending out ballots to everyone on the rolls has to be killed.Swaye said:So, let's say a miracle hail mary happens, and Trump wins Georgia, where does that put him? He would still need a couple other big flips wouldn't he? I'm all for trying to untangle all this and get an actual FAIR election, but it still seems a bridge too far for me. Perhaps I am too jaded at how corrupt our entire government and media establishment is to actually believe this will all be fixed on a grand scale. Georgia sure. Favorable political environment. Michigan? PA? Wiscy? Super fucking unlikely because the entire apparatus you are up against, both political and legal, is democrat controlled.
