St. Louis Couple Who Showed Guns Charged with Felonies
Comments
-
Anybody who votes Democrat deserves what’s coming to them.
—————-
“The unlawful use of a weapon charge is a class E felony, which can carry a sentence of up to four years in prison and a fine of $10,000. Sources tell 5 On Your Side Gardner's office will be issuing a summons for the couple to appear in court.
Police executed a search warrant at their home recently and seized the rifle from the couple. The McCloskeys told police that attorney Al Watkins had the pistol seen in photos of the couple that went viral.
The couple pointed the weapons at protesters who were on their way to Krewson's house upset with her decision to say the names of those who wrote to her, urging her to close the city jail, known as The Workhouse.
In a statement announcing the charges, Gardner said the McCloskeys waved their weapons in a "threatening manner" at "peaceful, unarmed protesters."” -
Unbelievable
-
Crazy democrat (communist) punishing law abiding citizens. Following marching orders. Governor already said he'd pardon them.
-
Moron lib just wants a felony on their record so they can't legally own guns. Mobs violating property rights is cool. Do not defend yourself. Good message. For communists.Sledog said:Crazy democrat (communist) punishing law abiding citizens. Following marching orders. Governor already said he'd pardon them.
-
The Law and Order Party. Unless it's one of us. Or a couple of us. One of which shows no skill or familiarity with handling a weapon.
-
They handled it perfectly. No shots fired, property protected. Fascists like you applaud them being charged for defending themselves. You’re such a Fascist asskisser.BennyBeaver said:The Law and Order Party. Unless it's one of us. Or a couple of us. One of which shows no skill or familiarity with handling a weapon.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/soros-linked-pac-donates-77000-st-louis-circuit-attorney-targeting?amp
St. Louis prosecutor targeting McCloskeys gets $78,000 infusion from Soros-linked group
A Soros-backed group also gave to Gardner's 2016 campaign -
You seem upset.NorthwestFresh said:
They handled it perfectly. No shots fired, property protected. Fascists like you applaud them being charged for defending themselves. You’re such a Fascist asskisser.BennyBeaver said:The Law and Order Party. Unless it's one of us. Or a couple of us. One of which shows no skill or familiarity with handling a weapon.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/soros-linked-pac-donates-77000-st-louis-circuit-attorney-targeting?amp
St. Louis prosecutor targeting McCloskeys gets $78,000 infusion from Soros-linked group
A Soros-backed group also gave to Gardner's 2016 campaign -
Yet you’re posting about it.BennyBeaver said:
You seem upset.NorthwestFresh said:
They handled it perfectly. No shots fired, property protected. Fascists like you applaud them being charged for defending themselves. You’re such a Fascist asskisser.BennyBeaver said:The Law and Order Party. Unless it's one of us. Or a couple of us. One of which shows no skill or familiarity with handling a weapon.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/soros-linked-pac-donates-77000-st-louis-circuit-attorney-targeting?amp
St. Louis prosecutor targeting McCloskeys gets $78,000 infusion from Soros-linked group
A Soros-backed group also gave to Gardner's 2016 campaign -
LOL. They had no ammo. What a couple of tards.
-
Fuck offBennyBeaver said:The Law and Order Party. Unless it's one of us. Or a couple of us. One of which shows no skill or familiarity with handling a weapon.
-
It was menacing though. Felony! Don’t know how to handle an empty gun!BennyBeaver said:LOL. They had no ammo. What a couple of tards.
Pew pew finger guns!
Nice self-own BennyBieber. -
Imagine waving empty guns at such an angry and violent mob. What could go wrong?
-
These two look like caricatures of rich people, so they became an easy target for the left, who didn't bother to point out that they had every right to be concerned about their property given that a mob of people was crossing the gate into their private street.
That said, they're still fucksticks who should learn how to properly handle guns. -
All they had to do was:
1- ignore the crowd that was ignoring them until they came out with guns
or
2- hold up a BLM sign
Instead they chose the Republitard route.
-
Guns with no ammo*GreenRiverGatorz said:These two look like caricatures of rich people, so they became an easy target for the left, who didn't bother to point out that they had every right to be concerned about their property given that a mob of people was crossing the gate into their private street.
That said, they're still fucksticks who should learn how to properly handle guns.
I hear they said PEW PEW too loud. -
Step 1 of properly handling a gun is making sure it's loaded.NorthwestFresh said:
Guns with no ammo*GreenRiverGatorz said:These two look like caricatures of rich people, so they became an easy target for the left, who didn't bother to point out that they had every right to be concerned about their property given that a mob of people was crossing the gate into their private street.
That said, they're still fucksticks who should learn how to properly handle guns.
I hear they said PEW PEW too loud. -
Pew pew guns can be menacing.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Step 1 of properly handling a gun is making sure it's loaded.NorthwestFresh said:
Guns with no ammo*GreenRiverGatorz said:These two look like caricatures of rich people, so they became an easy target for the left, who didn't bother to point out that they had every right to be concerned about their property given that a mob of people was crossing the gate into their private street.
That said, they're still fucksticks who should learn how to properly handle guns.
I hear they said PEW PEW too loud. -
You mean the crowd that was ignoring the McCroskeys on the McCroskey's driveway after breaching the gate leading up to the McCroskeys private property?BennyBeaver said:All they had to do was:
1- ignore the crowd that was ignoring them until they came out with guns
or
2- hold up a BLM sign
Instead they chose the Republitard route.
That crowd that was ignoring them? Or was there another crowd?
-
They are alive and the house the wasn't looted and burned down. I'd call it a successful defense. Why don't These folks do this in Idaho? Askin' for a fren.....BennyBeaver said:Imagine waving empty guns at such an angry and violent mob. What could go wrong?
-
Scary mob.GreenRiverGatorz said:These two look like caricatures of rich people, so they became an easy target for the left, who didn't bother to point out that they had every right to be concerned about their property given that a mob of people was crossing the gate into their private street.
That said, they're still fucksticks who should learn how to properly handle guns.
You afraid there fren?Sledog said:
They are alive and the house the wasn't looted and burned down. I'd call it a successful defense. Why don't These folks do this in Idaho? Askin' for a fren.....BennyBeaver said:Imagine waving empty guns at such an angry and violent mob. What could go wrong?
-
Pearl clutching at it's finest. The "angry mob" was walking down the street and sidewalk. Ignoring the tards until they came out with their guns.PurpleThrobber said:
You mean the crowd that was ignoring the McCroskeys on the McCroskey's driveway after breaching the gate leading up to the McCroskeys private property?BennyBeaver said:All they had to do was:
1- ignore the crowd that was ignoring them until they came out with guns
or
2- hold up a BLM sign
Instead they chose the Republitard route.
That crowd that was ignoring them? Or was there another crowd?
Of all the fucking hills to defend, these 2 shouldn't be it. -
They're being charged because Trump spoke out in their defense.
-
Don't you have a Milo rally to attend? FFS. They are being charged because they broke the law. Isn't that enough? Or is your tin-hat tingling?DerekJohnson said:They're being charged because Trump spoke out in their defense.
QAnon your vibe now? -
Apparently, you’ve never been to Idaho, Mr. UW Class of 2003.BennyBeaver said:
Scary mob.GreenRiverGatorz said:These two look like caricatures of rich people, so they became an easy target for the left, who didn't bother to point out that they had every right to be concerned about their property given that a mob of people was crossing the gate into their private street.
That said, they're still fucksticks who should learn how to properly handle guns.
You afraid there fren?Sledog said:
They are alive and the house the wasn't looted and burned down. I'd call it a successful defense. Why don't These folks do this in Idaho? Askin' for a fren.....BennyBeaver said:Imagine waving empty guns at such an angry and violent mob. What could go wrong?
Expand your horizons.
-
You’re wrong, they were on private property. Why lie about that part?BennyBeaver said:
Pearl clutching at it's finest. The "angry mob" was walking down the street and sidewalk. Ignoring the tards until they came out with their guns.PurpleThrobber said:
You mean the crowd that was ignoring the McCroskeys on the McCroskey's driveway after breaching the gate leading up to the McCroskeys private property?BennyBeaver said:All they had to do was:
1- ignore the crowd that was ignoring them until they came out with guns
or
2- hold up a BLM sign
Instead they chose the Republitard route.
That crowd that was ignoring them? Or was there another crowd?
Of all the fucking hills to defend, these 2 shouldn't be it. -
The new leftist narrative is that the McCroskey's stormed out of their house and menacingly waved their weapons at peaceful passerbys.NorthwestFresh said:
You’re wrong, they were on private property. Why lie about that part?BennyBeaver said:
Pearl clutching at it's finest. The "angry mob" was walking down the street and sidewalk. Ignoring the tards until they came out with their guns.PurpleThrobber said:
You mean the crowd that was ignoring the McCroskeys on the McCroskey's driveway after breaching the gate leading up to the McCroskeys private property?BennyBeaver said:All they had to do was:
1- ignore the crowd that was ignoring them until they came out with guns
or
2- hold up a BLM sign
Instead they chose the Republitard route.
That crowd that was ignoring them? Or was there another crowd?
Of all the fucking hills to defend, these 2 shouldn't be it.
It didn't work the first time they tried it either but bless their hearts.
-
They busted through an iron gate to enter their private property. Minor factoid to the fake OSEwe poaster.
-
You mean BLM idiots ignoring them like this?BennyBeaver said:All they had to do was:
1- ignore the crowd that was ignoring them until they came out with guns
or
2- hold up a BLM sign
Instead they chose the Republitard route.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jCpUMUezzY
-
Not at all. Come on over.BennyBeaver said:
Scary mob.GreenRiverGatorz said:These two look like caricatures of rich people, so they became an easy target for the left, who didn't bother to point out that they had every right to be concerned about their property given that a mob of people was crossing the gate into their private street.
That said, they're still fucksticks who should learn how to properly handle guns.
You afraid there fren?Sledog said:
They are alive and the house the wasn't looted and burned down. I'd call it a successful defense. Why don't These folks do this in Idaho? Askin' for a fren.....BennyBeaver said:Imagine waving empty guns at such an angry and violent mob. What could go wrong?
-
Fuck offBennyBeaver said:
Don't you have a Milo rally to attend? FFS. They are being charged because they broke the law. Isn't that enough? Or is your tin-hat tingling?DerekJohnson said:They're being charged because Trump spoke out in their defense.
QAnon your vibe now?
