RIP Civil War

SpoonieLuv said:

HHusky said:

SpoonieLuv said:

The unpopularity of my position is not lost on me yet it is not devoid of serious scholarship on the issue. It stems from the evaluation of using a ground war to solve societal differences which have sewn the seeds of the turmoil which exists at present. It's not unreasonable to question whether Lincoln's war was the correct action to eliminate the obviously odious institution of slavery and its strong foothold in the southern (albeit it plantation owners were a very small minority of the southern population - not excusing it but it is not factual the a substantial number of them were slave-owners regardless of whether it was a supported position) institutions. A war on such scale should have been the last resort for the elimination of state approved slavery and the fact that the majority of all other countries ended slavery without a bloody conflict on this scale should be the only proof necessary to make one skeptical.

In the momentous step which our State [Mississippi] has taken of dissolving its connection with the government of which we so long formed a part, it is but just that we should declare the prominent reasons which have induced our course.

Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery - the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin.

"Lincoln's War"

Correct attribution but economically devoid as the southern actual racists did not understand the infeasibility of their positions. Actual racist positions. Holds the same weight as arguments of American colonialists purposely providing smallpox infected blankets long before the germ theory of disease.

Again, "a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization."

How do you price that?

You seem to be ignoring some basic issues like human nature. Throughout human history violence has been used to settle intractable differences. Sometimes its a one banana and two monkeys type of thing. I want what you have and I'm going to take it. You either give it up or fight over it. It doesn't take two to fight. It just takes one and then a decision has to be made. You think the Germans and Japanese didn't regret starting World War II? Turned out pretty badly for them. A peaceful solution is always preferable if it is a solution for both sides. No slavery wasn't a solution for the South. Should have been but humans make bad decisions.

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

I'm sure the Romans and English probably owe me reparations! Fork it over!

Irish?

It figures.

Maybe a little. More Scot. Half W.O.P. Did they enslave you Polack's? If the Romans probably did.

Sounds like you have something against the Polls.

Nope.

haie said:

dnc said:

It wasn't a war fought to perpetuate slavery, it was a war fought to free the fucking slaves. Which it did, incidentally.

The Civil War has a much better racial connotation than say, the name Oregon or Oregon State.

SoFuckingIrritating.gif

It was because the South didn't feel they would have a voice in the union anymore. It wasn't fought over slavery.

Half truth. Noble, "lost cause" myth.

The chief concern they had regarding not having a voice was the threat to the institution of slavery. Each state made a proclamation on their reasons for leaving. You can find those statement online. Why not believe them?