Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Voter Fraud is a myth
Comments
-
I'm not a Secretary of State.ThomasFremont said:
Set it up. It takes even longer if you never get started.salemcoog said:
The fear is in that it takes many months to over a year to set up secure vote by mail systems. But the left doesn't care about secure voting systems much, now do they?ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Another urban myth. While there are a few places that have these problems they are far from the norm and all most all of them occur in Rat run cities and counties. Now where's that article supporting your lie about a majority of some city's polling places being closed? And since I know that liberals are fucking liars it's not hard for me to believe that these number include the numbers of polling places that have been closed while omitting the number of new places that have been opened.ThomasFremont said:
Do you have to stand in line all day to wait to vote?SFGbob said:Wow nothing about a majority of all polling places being closed in a city. Fucking liar. Btw, I've been in my current location since 2004. My polling place has been closed eight different times now. Am I a victim of voter suppression Tommy?
Of course it isn’t the norm. It’s targeted at specific areas in the states where the GOP controls the election process and can get away with it. That way useful idiots like you can pretend it’s a myth and scream about unsubstantiated voter fraud if it’s ever brought up.
How else do you explain the fear over switching to mail in ballots? Works great in WA. Trump likes to vote by mail too. You calling the president wrong?
Or are you for centralized elections now? -
You’ve made the point repeatedly that it takes time to set up correctly. Fine, so let’s get started. Do it right. I have no problem with that.salemcoog said:
I'm not a Secretary of State.ThomasFremont said:
Set it up. It takes even longer if you never get started.salemcoog said:
The fear is in that it takes many months to over a year to set up secure vote by mail systems. But the left doesn't care about secure voting systems much, now do they?ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Another urban myth. While there are a few places that have these problems they are far from the norm and all most all of them occur in Rat run cities and counties. Now where's that article supporting your lie about a majority of some city's polling places being closed? And since I know that liberals are fucking liars it's not hard for me to believe that these number include the numbers of polling places that have been closed while omitting the number of new places that have been opened.ThomasFremont said:
Do you have to stand in line all day to wait to vote?SFGbob said:Wow nothing about a majority of all polling places being closed in a city. Fucking liar. Btw, I've been in my current location since 2004. My polling place has been closed eight different times now. Am I a victim of voter suppression Tommy?
Of course it isn’t the norm. It’s targeted at specific areas in the states where the GOP controls the election process and can get away with it. That way useful idiots like you can pretend it’s a myth and scream about unsubstantiated voter fraud if it’s ever brought up.
How else do you explain the fear over switching to mail in ballots? Works great in WA. Trump likes to vote by mail too. You calling the president wrong?
Or are you for centralized elections now?
Beyond this time constraint, I’ve yet to hear any other rationale for opposing the switch to mail in ballots across the country.
-
Sure, as long as we audit the voter rolls for basic things like citizenship, duplicates, deaths, felonies, etc. That should be a basic litmus test of if this is on the up and up or not right?ThomasFremont said:
You’ve made the point repeatedly that it takes time to set up correctly. Fine, so let’s get started. Do it right. I have no problem with that.salemcoog said:
I'm not a Secretary of State.ThomasFremont said:
Set it up. It takes even longer if you never get started.salemcoog said:
The fear is in that it takes many months to over a year to set up secure vote by mail systems. But the left doesn't care about secure voting systems much, now do they?ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Another urban myth. While there are a few places that have these problems they are far from the norm and all most all of them occur in Rat run cities and counties. Now where's that article supporting your lie about a majority of some city's polling places being closed? And since I know that liberals are fucking liars it's not hard for me to believe that these number include the numbers of polling places that have been closed while omitting the number of new places that have been opened.ThomasFremont said:
Do you have to stand in line all day to wait to vote?SFGbob said:Wow nothing about a majority of all polling places being closed in a city. Fucking liar. Btw, I've been in my current location since 2004. My polling place has been closed eight different times now. Am I a victim of voter suppression Tommy?
Of course it isn’t the norm. It’s targeted at specific areas in the states where the GOP controls the election process and can get away with it. That way useful idiots like you can pretend it’s a myth and scream about unsubstantiated voter fraud if it’s ever brought up.
How else do you explain the fear over switching to mail in ballots? Works great in WA. Trump likes to vote by mail too. You calling the president wrong?
Or are you for centralized elections now?
Beyond this time constraint, I’ve yet to hear any other rationale for opposing the switch to mail in ballots across the country.
I wonder why that's a non-starter in mail-in California. -
AgreedUW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, as long as we audit the voter rolls for basic things like citizenship, duplicates, deaths, felonies, etc. That should be a basic litmus test of if this is on the up and up or not right?ThomasFremont said:
You’ve made the point repeatedly that it takes time to set up correctly. Fine, so let’s get started. Do it right. I have no problem with that.salemcoog said:
I'm not a Secretary of State.ThomasFremont said:
Set it up. It takes even longer if you never get started.salemcoog said:
The fear is in that it takes many months to over a year to set up secure vote by mail systems. But the left doesn't care about secure voting systems much, now do they?ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Another urban myth. While there are a few places that have these problems they are far from the norm and all most all of them occur in Rat run cities and counties. Now where's that article supporting your lie about a majority of some city's polling places being closed? And since I know that liberals are fucking liars it's not hard for me to believe that these number include the numbers of polling places that have been closed while omitting the number of new places that have been opened.ThomasFremont said:
Do you have to stand in line all day to wait to vote?SFGbob said:Wow nothing about a majority of all polling places being closed in a city. Fucking liar. Btw, I've been in my current location since 2004. My polling place has been closed eight different times now. Am I a victim of voter suppression Tommy?
Of course it isn’t the norm. It’s targeted at specific areas in the states where the GOP controls the election process and can get away with it. That way useful idiots like you can pretend it’s a myth and scream about unsubstantiated voter fraud if it’s ever brought up.
How else do you explain the fear over switching to mail in ballots? Works great in WA. Trump likes to vote by mail too. You calling the president wrong?
Or are you for centralized elections now?
Beyond this time constraint, I’ve yet to hear any other rationale for opposing the switch to mail in ballots across the country.
I wonder why that's a non-starter in mail-in California. -
I don't know anyone of consequence who opposes making the voter rolls accurate. People do object to half assing the job by purging the rolls of every third Lopez, however.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, as long as we audit the voter rolls for basic things like citizenship, duplicates, deaths, felonies, etc. That should be a basic litmus test of if this is on the up and up or not right?ThomasFremont said:
You’ve made the point repeatedly that it takes time to set up correctly. Fine, so let’s get started. Do it right. I have no problem with that.salemcoog said:
I'm not a Secretary of State.ThomasFremont said:
Set it up. It takes even longer if you never get started.salemcoog said:
The fear is in that it takes many months to over a year to set up secure vote by mail systems. But the left doesn't care about secure voting systems much, now do they?ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Another urban myth. While there are a few places that have these problems they are far from the norm and all most all of them occur in Rat run cities and counties. Now where's that article supporting your lie about a majority of some city's polling places being closed? And since I know that liberals are fucking liars it's not hard for me to believe that these number include the numbers of polling places that have been closed while omitting the number of new places that have been opened.ThomasFremont said:
Do you have to stand in line all day to wait to vote?SFGbob said:Wow nothing about a majority of all polling places being closed in a city. Fucking liar. Btw, I've been in my current location since 2004. My polling place has been closed eight different times now. Am I a victim of voter suppression Tommy?
Of course it isn’t the norm. It’s targeted at specific areas in the states where the GOP controls the election process and can get away with it. That way useful idiots like you can pretend it’s a myth and scream about unsubstantiated voter fraud if it’s ever brought up.
How else do you explain the fear over switching to mail in ballots? Works great in WA. Trump likes to vote by mail too. You calling the president wrong?
Or are you for centralized elections now?
Beyond this time constraint, I’ve yet to hear any other rationale for opposing the switch to mail in ballots across the country.
I wonder why that's a non-starter in mail-in California. -
Well your of no consequence so that part is accurateHHusky said:
I don't know anyone of consequence who opposes making the voter rolls accurate. People do object to half assing the job by purging the rolls of every third Lopez, however.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, as long as we audit the voter rolls for basic things like citizenship, duplicates, deaths, felonies, etc. That should be a basic litmus test of if this is on the up and up or not right?ThomasFremont said:
You’ve made the point repeatedly that it takes time to set up correctly. Fine, so let’s get started. Do it right. I have no problem with that.salemcoog said:
I'm not a Secretary of State.ThomasFremont said:
Set it up. It takes even longer if you never get started.salemcoog said:
The fear is in that it takes many months to over a year to set up secure vote by mail systems. But the left doesn't care about secure voting systems much, now do they?ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Another urban myth. While there are a few places that have these problems they are far from the norm and all most all of them occur in Rat run cities and counties. Now where's that article supporting your lie about a majority of some city's polling places being closed? And since I know that liberals are fucking liars it's not hard for me to believe that these number include the numbers of polling places that have been closed while omitting the number of new places that have been opened.ThomasFremont said:
Do you have to stand in line all day to wait to vote?SFGbob said:Wow nothing about a majority of all polling places being closed in a city. Fucking liar. Btw, I've been in my current location since 2004. My polling place has been closed eight different times now. Am I a victim of voter suppression Tommy?
Of course it isn’t the norm. It’s targeted at specific areas in the states where the GOP controls the election process and can get away with it. That way useful idiots like you can pretend it’s a myth and scream about unsubstantiated voter fraud if it’s ever brought up.
How else do you explain the fear over switching to mail in ballots? Works great in WA. Trump likes to vote by mail too. You calling the president wrong?
Or are you for centralized elections now?
Beyond this time constraint, I’ve yet to hear any other rationale for opposing the switch to mail in ballots across the country.
I wonder why that's a non-starter in mail-in California.
I'm sure you have multiple links for your conspiracy theory -
Should we just go ahead and name these plays at this point? This could be like NE vs. the Rams during spygate.HHusky said:
I don't know anyone of consequence who opposes making the voter rolls accurate. People do object to half assing the job by purging the rolls of every third Lopez, however.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, as long as we audit the voter rolls for basic things like citizenship, duplicates, deaths, felonies, etc. That should be a basic litmus test of if this is on the up and up or not right?ThomasFremont said:
You’ve made the point repeatedly that it takes time to set up correctly. Fine, so let’s get started. Do it right. I have no problem with that.salemcoog said:
I'm not a Secretary of State.ThomasFremont said:
Set it up. It takes even longer if you never get started.salemcoog said:
The fear is in that it takes many months to over a year to set up secure vote by mail systems. But the left doesn't care about secure voting systems much, now do they?ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Another urban myth. While there are a few places that have these problems they are far from the norm and all most all of them occur in Rat run cities and counties. Now where's that article supporting your lie about a majority of some city's polling places being closed? And since I know that liberals are fucking liars it's not hard for me to believe that these number include the numbers of polling places that have been closed while omitting the number of new places that have been opened.ThomasFremont said:
Do you have to stand in line all day to wait to vote?SFGbob said:Wow nothing about a majority of all polling places being closed in a city. Fucking liar. Btw, I've been in my current location since 2004. My polling place has been closed eight different times now. Am I a victim of voter suppression Tommy?
Of course it isn’t the norm. It’s targeted at specific areas in the states where the GOP controls the election process and can get away with it. That way useful idiots like you can pretend it’s a myth and scream about unsubstantiated voter fraud if it’s ever brought up.
How else do you explain the fear over switching to mail in ballots? Works great in WA. Trump likes to vote by mail too. You calling the president wrong?
Or are you for centralized elections now?
Beyond this time constraint, I’ve yet to hear any other rationale for opposing the switch to mail in ballots across the country.
I wonder why that's a non-starter in mail-in California. -
Who gives a fuck if someone is? It's neither a serious argument nor a relevant one.SFGbob said:
Nobody is saying voter fraud is a myth.GreenRiverGatorz said:
My favorite part of your argument is that the burden of proof is on those who oppose the GOP disenfranchisement efforts to prove that there is no voter fraud.RaceBannon said:
That's not accurate because the states refused to cooperate. Gee I wonder whyThomasFremont said:
We had a study. Trump’s own commission. They found nothing.RaceBannon said:
Again what study are you relying on?ThomasFremont said:
ID?RaceBannon said:
How can you disenfranchise an illegal voter?ThomasFremont said:Nobody says it’s a myth. People get caught every year.
The myth is that voter fraud is so widespread it justifies mass disenfranchisement or changes outcomes.
Don’t believe me? Just ask Trump. His own committee found nothing and he shut it down. The whole thing was a stunt to soothe his ego over losing the popular vote so bigly.
https://apnews.com/f5f6a73b2af546ee97816bb35e82c18d/Report:-Trump-commission-did-not-find-widespread-voter-fraud
What study do you get your data from that the numbers are insignificant?
You need ID for everything. The idea that ID stops anyone with half a brain from voting is the REAL myth
How about shutting down the majority of polling places in large metropolitan areas.
Refusing to switch to mail ballots.
Purging voter rolls right before Election Day and refusing to count provisional ballots.
Nobody talking about ID or illegals here. I am talking about Americans.
If illegals are voting in massive numbers, where’s the proof? You have a FEELING. Not evidence.
Voter rolls should be purged routinely. Stops fraud
That's am impressive list of left wing loser myths you got
All you have is a Sledog meme and a FEELING. Get back to me when you have that evidence.
So what study are you using? Where is your proof of the loser's lament you like to unleash here from time to time?
Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I've always believed that somebody needs to actually prove material voter fraud before we go and make voting systematically more difficult in certain jurisdictions. I see a lot of funny memes about dead uncles voting, but nothing to substantiate that this is an actual widespread problem worthy of legislation.
Only anti-American dipshits try to decrease voting. -
Yeah, just the entire Rat party political leadership in California and across the country but no one of consequence. You're such a fucking hack Dazzler.HHusky said:
I don't know anyone of consequence who opposes making the voter rolls accurate. People do object to half assing the job by purging the rolls of every third Lopez, however.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, as long as we audit the voter rolls for basic things like citizenship, duplicates, deaths, felonies, etc. That should be a basic litmus test of if this is on the up and up or not right?ThomasFremont said:
You’ve made the point repeatedly that it takes time to set up correctly. Fine, so let’s get started. Do it right. I have no problem with that.salemcoog said:
I'm not a Secretary of State.ThomasFremont said:
Set it up. It takes even longer if you never get started.salemcoog said:
The fear is in that it takes many months to over a year to set up secure vote by mail systems. But the left doesn't care about secure voting systems much, now do they?ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Another urban myth. While there are a few places that have these problems they are far from the norm and all most all of them occur in Rat run cities and counties. Now where's that article supporting your lie about a majority of some city's polling places being closed? And since I know that liberals are fucking liars it's not hard for me to believe that these number include the numbers of polling places that have been closed while omitting the number of new places that have been opened.ThomasFremont said:
Do you have to stand in line all day to wait to vote?SFGbob said:Wow nothing about a majority of all polling places being closed in a city. Fucking liar. Btw, I've been in my current location since 2004. My polling place has been closed eight different times now. Am I a victim of voter suppression Tommy?
Of course it isn’t the norm. It’s targeted at specific areas in the states where the GOP controls the election process and can get away with it. That way useful idiots like you can pretend it’s a myth and scream about unsubstantiated voter fraud if it’s ever brought up.
How else do you explain the fear over switching to mail in ballots? Works great in WA. Trump likes to vote by mail too. You calling the president wrong?
Or are you for centralized elections now?
Beyond this time constraint, I’ve yet to hear any other rationale for opposing the switch to mail in ballots across the country.
I wonder why that's a non-starter in mail-in California. -
The verification process here in California to ensure that a non-citizen isn't registering to vote is based entirely on the honor system. There is no cross check of any Federal database to determine whether someone is or is not a citizen.
The voter registration database, though, does not include official citizenship documents, according to Padilla’s office.
Instead, it indicates whether applicants affirmed their eligibility status because they had to “declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California” they are a U.S. citizen and resident of California and at least 16 years old, not currently in a state or federal prison or on parole for the conviction of a felony and not currently found mentally incompetent to vote by a court.
The applicant must also verify he or she understands it’s is a crime to intentionally provide incorrect information and that the information on the registration form is true and correct.
https://www.sacbee.com/article235686972.html -
Did I mention voter ID? I was talking about how dem leadership, and this case it is dem leadership at the very top, was corrupt.HHusky said:
Focus lady! Voter ID would have prevented this how?Bendintheriver said:
What is impressive about this story Bob, is the fact it wasn't just one person. It was multiple rats in power. The political consultants and the candidates themselves, you know they had to know about it. Three years running and you can probably guess there is a lot more there than what was admitted to. That is a lot of guilty rats.SFGbob said:
Every election cycle we find out more and more rats cheated and every time the rats on here come and act as if it is no big deal.
Fuck that strawman's ass HH. FFS man, at the very least try to be in the moment and engaged in the topic. -
His post is hilarious because I guarantee you that the majority vote in those areas was white.salemcoog said:
Coo. Now do how it's the Republicans fault.ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Ironic coming from the mouthy Kunt who still hasn't backed up his claim that a majority of all polling places where being closed in metro areas.ThomasFremont said:Lotta FEELINGS. Still no evidence.
If this is as wide spread as you’d have people believe, should be easy to prove.
Tick, tick, tick...
Or is that another Tommy "fact" that you know is true due to your "life experience?"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1VV09J
Phoenix and Atlanta. Reduced access (fewer polling places and reduced hours).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/02/texas-polling-sites-closures-voting
Targeted closures in Texas.
Almost 2k closures in a handful of years, the majority of the closures took place in metropolitan areas. Where black and Latino people tend to live in higher numbers. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
But keep crying about voter fraud that you can’t provide a single shred of evidence for outside of a handful of cases.
IF IT STOPS ONE FRAUDULENT VOTE!!1!
-
That Democrat run states REFUSE to purge voter rolls or allow those appointed to check them for anomalies is all I need to know.
Shenanigans! -
Fuck off on Texas...while they closed some polling sites (mainly for budget...instead of cheap paper ballots they now have those stupid expensive electronic machines) they added/extended the time one has to vote with early voting. We can vote anytime for 2 weeks before the election...because of that no lines and no issues. Anyone who wants to vote can easily vote...and because of that voter turnout has actually bumped up slightly here.ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Ironic coming from the mouthy Kunt who still hasn't backed up his claim that a majority of all polling places where being closed in metro areas.ThomasFremont said:Lotta FEELINGS. Still no evidence.
If this is as wide spread as you’d have people believe, should be easy to prove.
Tick, tick, tick...
Or is that another Tommy "fact" that you know is true due to your "life experience?"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1VV09J
Phoenix and Atlanta. Reduced access (fewer polling places and reduced hours).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/02/texas-polling-sites-closures-voting
Targeted closures in Texas.
Almost 2k closures in a handful of years, the majority of the closures took place in metropolitan areas. Where black and Latino people tend to live in higher numbers. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
But keep crying about voter fraud that you can’t provide a single shred of evidence for outside of a handful of cases.
IF IT STOPS ONE FRAUDULENT VOTE!!1!
Keep lying. -
I'll become a dem after I'm dead most likely
The dncs biggest loss was race. Never gonna get that vote -
The exception that proves the rule.HoustonHusky said:
Fuck off on Texas...while they closed some polling sites (mainly for budget...instead of cheap paper ballots they now have those stupid expensive electronic machines) they added/extended the time one has to vote with early voting. We can vote anytime for 2 weeks before the election...because of that no lines and no issues. Anyone who wants to vote can easily vote...and because of that voter turnout has actually bumped up slightly here.ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Ironic coming from the mouthy Kunt who still hasn't backed up his claim that a majority of all polling places where being closed in metro areas.ThomasFremont said:Lotta FEELINGS. Still no evidence.
If this is as wide spread as you’d have people believe, should be easy to prove.
Tick, tick, tick...
Or is that another Tommy "fact" that you know is true due to your "life experience?"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1VV09J
Phoenix and Atlanta. Reduced access (fewer polling places and reduced hours).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/02/texas-polling-sites-closures-voting
Targeted closures in Texas.
Almost 2k closures in a handful of years, the majority of the closures took place in metropolitan areas. Where black and Latino people tend to live in higher numbers. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
But keep crying about voter fraud that you can’t provide a single shred of evidence for outside of a handful of cases.
IF IT STOPS ONE FRAUDULENT VOTE!!1!
Keep lying. -
I'm all for voter suppression. You play to win the game
-
you've found like 1 of the 15 examples you find in any election. Usually at least half of them are pro-GOP fraud.
As Tommy said, voter fraud is a thing. But it's nowhere near as widespread as it would need to be to justify the red state voter suppression scheme. -
At least you have the GUTS to call it what it is.Pitchfork51 said:I'm all for voter suppression. You play to win the game
-
this should be the position of libs. California should absolutely be shutting down polling places in rural white precincts and gerrymandering the shit out of the state. But nope, gotta be the nice guy losers that Dems are.Pitchfork51 said:I'm all for voter suppression. You play to win the game
-
Keep lying. Quick check shows Arizona had the highest voter turnout % for an off-Presidental cycle in the last 20+ years.ThomasFremont said:
The exception that proves the rule.HoustonHusky said:
Fuck off on Texas...while they closed some polling sites (mainly for budget...instead of cheap paper ballots they now have those stupid expensive electronic machines) they added/extended the time one has to vote with early voting. We can vote anytime for 2 weeks before the election...because of that no lines and no issues. Anyone who wants to vote can easily vote...and because of that voter turnout has actually bumped up slightly here.ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Ironic coming from the mouthy Kunt who still hasn't backed up his claim that a majority of all polling places where being closed in metro areas.ThomasFremont said:Lotta FEELINGS. Still no evidence.
If this is as wide spread as you’d have people believe, should be easy to prove.
Tick, tick, tick...
Or is that another Tommy "fact" that you know is true due to your "life experience?"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1VV09J
Phoenix and Atlanta. Reduced access (fewer polling places and reduced hours).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/02/texas-polling-sites-closures-voting
Targeted closures in Texas.
Almost 2k closures in a handful of years, the majority of the closures took place in metropolitan areas. Where black and Latino people tend to live in higher numbers. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
But keep crying about voter fraud that you can’t provide a single shred of evidence for outside of a handful of cases.
IF IT STOPS ONE FRAUDULENT VOTE!!1!
Keep lying. -
So the thesis of this thread is that Democrats commit the majority of voter fraud and that the GOP commits little to no voter suppression? Odd it’s so one sided and that there’s no balance here.incremetal_progress said:you've found like 1 of the 15 examples you find in any election. Usually at least half of them are pro-GOP fraud.
As Tommy said, voter fraud is a thing. But it's nowhere near as widespread as it would need to be to justify the red state voter suppression scheme. -
Rats claimed that voter ID law were designed to suppress the black vote. After Georgia passed voter ID they had their highest black voter turn out ever. Same with Texas.HoustonHusky said:
Keep lying. Quick check shows Arizona had the highest voter turnout % for an off-Presidental cycle in the last 20+ years.ThomasFremont said:
The exception that proves the rule.HoustonHusky said:
Fuck off on Texas...while they closed some polling sites (mainly for budget...instead of cheap paper ballots they now have those stupid expensive electronic machines) they added/extended the time one has to vote with early voting. We can vote anytime for 2 weeks before the election...because of that no lines and no issues. Anyone who wants to vote can easily vote...and because of that voter turnout has actually bumped up slightly here.ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Ironic coming from the mouthy Kunt who still hasn't backed up his claim that a majority of all polling places where being closed in metro areas.ThomasFremont said:Lotta FEELINGS. Still no evidence.
If this is as wide spread as you’d have people believe, should be easy to prove.
Tick, tick, tick...
Or is that another Tommy "fact" that you know is true due to your "life experience?"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1VV09J
Phoenix and Atlanta. Reduced access (fewer polling places and reduced hours).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/02/texas-polling-sites-closures-voting
Targeted closures in Texas.
Almost 2k closures in a handful of years, the majority of the closures took place in metropolitan areas. Where black and Latino people tend to live in higher numbers. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
But keep crying about voter fraud that you can’t provide a single shred of evidence for outside of a handful of cases.
IF IT STOPS ONE FRAUDULENT VOTE!!1!
Keep lying.
All leftists know how to do is lie.
https://www.ajc.com/news/despite-voter-law-minority-turnout-georgia/3wOfD2SkXmTgRwbySd2ZiK/
You'll notice that Tommy didn't even bother to address his bullshit about GOP controlled states imposing increased voting times after I posted the article about a few LA polling places having long waiting times. -
Gop suppresses and Dems use illegals and dead people.
The difference is that Dems claim moral superiority -
Hurtful! Also completely understandable.YellowSnow said:
You were too short bruh. It’s @Gladstone or bust for me.huskyhooligan said:This past election, shortly after the meet up at the Duchess where @Doog_de_Jour @paws @YellowSnow @PurpleBaze @Tequilla and most sadly @89ute all turned down my sexual advances, I moved to the Souf Sound, I proceeded to receive a ballot from King & Pierce Counties. I know my liberal brother in-law votes in California and Washington elections, including presidential.
-
Then contribute substance, balance it out and quit your tedious Goddamn'd whining. Jesus.MelloDawg said:
So the thesis of this thread is that Democrats commit the majority of voter fraud and that the GOP commits little to no voter suppression? Odd it’s so one sided and that there’s no balance here.incremetal_progress said:you've found like 1 of the 15 examples you find in any election. Usually at least half of them are pro-GOP fraud.
As Tommy said, voter fraud is a thing. But it's nowhere near as widespread as it would need to be to justify the red state voter suppression scheme. -
What lie? I said they closed a bunch of polling places. If that’s fundamentally wrong, fire away. Otherwise take a walk, smoke a bowl, and get some perspective.HoustonHusky said:
Keep lying. Quick check shows Arizona had the highest voter turnout % for an off-Presidental cycle in the last 20+ years.ThomasFremont said:
The exception that proves the rule.HoustonHusky said:
Fuck off on Texas...while they closed some polling sites (mainly for budget...instead of cheap paper ballots they now have those stupid expensive electronic machines) they added/extended the time one has to vote with early voting. We can vote anytime for 2 weeks before the election...because of that no lines and no issues. Anyone who wants to vote can easily vote...and because of that voter turnout has actually bumped up slightly here.ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Ironic coming from the mouthy Kunt who still hasn't backed up his claim that a majority of all polling places where being closed in metro areas.ThomasFremont said:Lotta FEELINGS. Still no evidence.
If this is as wide spread as you’d have people believe, should be easy to prove.
Tick, tick, tick...
Or is that another Tommy "fact" that you know is true due to your "life experience?"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1VV09J
Phoenix and Atlanta. Reduced access (fewer polling places and reduced hours).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/02/texas-polling-sites-closures-voting
Targeted closures in Texas.
Almost 2k closures in a handful of years, the majority of the closures took place in metropolitan areas. Where black and Latino people tend to live in higher numbers. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
But keep crying about voter fraud that you can’t provide a single shred of evidence for outside of a handful of cases.
IF IT STOPS ONE FRAUDULENT VOTE!!1!
Keep lying. -
You lied and claimed they closed a majority of polling places. Fuck off Tommy.ThomasFremont said:
What lie? I said they closed a bunch of polling places. If that’s fundamentally wrong, fire away. Otherwise take a walk, smoke a bowl, and get some perspective.HoustonHusky said:
Keep lying. Quick check shows Arizona had the highest voter turnout % for an off-Presidental cycle in the last 20+ years.ThomasFremont said:
The exception that proves the rule.HoustonHusky said:
Fuck off on Texas...while they closed some polling sites (mainly for budget...instead of cheap paper ballots they now have those stupid expensive electronic machines) they added/extended the time one has to vote with early voting. We can vote anytime for 2 weeks before the election...because of that no lines and no issues. Anyone who wants to vote can easily vote...and because of that voter turnout has actually bumped up slightly here.ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Ironic coming from the mouthy Kunt who still hasn't backed up his claim that a majority of all polling places where being closed in metro areas.ThomasFremont said:Lotta FEELINGS. Still no evidence.
If this is as wide spread as you’d have people believe, should be easy to prove.
Tick, tick, tick...
Or is that another Tommy "fact" that you know is true due to your "life experience?"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1VV09J
Phoenix and Atlanta. Reduced access (fewer polling places and reduced hours).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/02/texas-polling-sites-closures-voting
Targeted closures in Texas.
Almost 2k closures in a handful of years, the majority of the closures took place in metropolitan areas. Where black and Latino people tend to live in higher numbers. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
But keep crying about voter fraud that you can’t provide a single shred of evidence for outside of a handful of cases.
IF IT STOPS ONE FRAUDULENT VOTE!!1!
Keep lying. -
I said the majority of the places closed were in metropolitan areas you illiterate INCEL.SFGbob said:
You lied and claimed they closed a majority of polling places. Fuck off Tommy.ThomasFremont said:
What lie? I said they closed a bunch of polling places. If that’s fundamentally wrong, fire away. Otherwise take a walk, smoke a bowl, and get some perspective.HoustonHusky said:
Keep lying. Quick check shows Arizona had the highest voter turnout % for an off-Presidental cycle in the last 20+ years.ThomasFremont said:
The exception that proves the rule.HoustonHusky said:
Fuck off on Texas...while they closed some polling sites (mainly for budget...instead of cheap paper ballots they now have those stupid expensive electronic machines) they added/extended the time one has to vote with early voting. We can vote anytime for 2 weeks before the election...because of that no lines and no issues. Anyone who wants to vote can easily vote...and because of that voter turnout has actually bumped up slightly here.ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Ironic coming from the mouthy Kunt who still hasn't backed up his claim that a majority of all polling places where being closed in metro areas.ThomasFremont said:Lotta FEELINGS. Still no evidence.
If this is as wide spread as you’d have people believe, should be easy to prove.
Tick, tick, tick...
Or is that another Tommy "fact" that you know is true due to your "life experience?"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1VV09J
Phoenix and Atlanta. Reduced access (fewer polling places and reduced hours).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/02/texas-polling-sites-closures-voting
Targeted closures in Texas.
Almost 2k closures in a handful of years, the majority of the closures took place in metropolitan areas. Where black and Latino people tend to live in higher numbers. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
But keep crying about voter fraud that you can’t provide a single shred of evidence for outside of a handful of cases.
IF IT STOPS ONE FRAUDULENT VOTE!!1!
Keep lying. -
Why did the Rat run election districts do that liar? And why did black voting turn out increase after they passed voter ID laws in Georgia Tommy? Is California a GOP controlled state Tommy? Because they had long lines in LA county during the primary this year.ThomasFremont said:
I said the majority of the places closed were in metropolitan areas you illiterate INCEL.SFGbob said:
You lied and claimed they closed a majority of polling places. Fuck off Tommy.ThomasFremont said:
What lie? I said they closed a bunch of polling places. If that’s fundamentally wrong, fire away. Otherwise take a walk, smoke a bowl, and get some perspective.HoustonHusky said:
Keep lying. Quick check shows Arizona had the highest voter turnout % for an off-Presidental cycle in the last 20+ years.ThomasFremont said:
The exception that proves the rule.HoustonHusky said:
Fuck off on Texas...while they closed some polling sites (mainly for budget...instead of cheap paper ballots they now have those stupid expensive electronic machines) they added/extended the time one has to vote with early voting. We can vote anytime for 2 weeks before the election...because of that no lines and no issues. Anyone who wants to vote can easily vote...and because of that voter turnout has actually bumped up slightly here.ThomasFremont said:SFGbob said:
Ironic coming from the mouthy Kunt who still hasn't backed up his claim that a majority of all polling places where being closed in metro areas.ThomasFremont said:Lotta FEELINGS. Still no evidence.
If this is as wide spread as you’d have people believe, should be easy to prove.
Tick, tick, tick...
Or is that another Tommy "fact" that you know is true due to your "life experience?"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1VV09J
Phoenix and Atlanta. Reduced access (fewer polling places and reduced hours).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/02/texas-polling-sites-closures-voting
Targeted closures in Texas.
Almost 2k closures in a handful of years, the majority of the closures took place in metropolitan areas. Where black and Latino people tend to live in higher numbers. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
But keep crying about voter fraud that you can’t provide a single shred of evidence for outside of a handful of cases.
IF IT STOPS ONE FRAUDULENT VOTE!!1!
Keep lying.
Fuck off.
