Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Voter Fraud is a myth
Comments
-
I'm not a Secretary of State.ThomasFremont said:
Set it up. It takes even longer if you never get started.
Or are you for centralized elections now? -
You’ve made the point repeatedly that it takes time to set up correctly. Fine, so let’s get started. Do it right. I have no problem with that.salemcoog said:
Beyond this time constraint, I’ve yet to hear any other rationale for opposing the switch to mail in ballots across the country.
-
Sure, as long as we audit the voter rolls for basic things like citizenship, duplicates, deaths, felonies, etc. That should be a basic litmus test of if this is on the up and up or not right?ThomasFremont said:
You’ve made the point repeatedly that it takes time to set up correctly. Fine, so let’s get started. Do it right. I have no problem with that.
Beyond this time constraint, I’ve yet to hear any other rationale for opposing the switch to mail in ballots across the country.
I wonder why that's a non-starter in mail-in California. -
AgreedUW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, as long as we audit the voter rolls for basic things like citizenship, duplicates, deaths, felonies, etc. That should be a basic litmus test of if this is on the up and up or not right?
I wonder why that's a non-starter in mail-in California. -
I don't know anyone of consequence who opposes making the voter rolls accurate. People do object to half assing the job by purging the rolls of every third Lopez, however.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, as long as we audit the voter rolls for basic things like citizenship, duplicates, deaths, felonies, etc. That should be a basic litmus test of if this is on the up and up or not right?
I wonder why that's a non-starter in mail-in California. -
Well your of no consequence so that part is accurateHHusky said:
I don't know anyone of consequence who opposes making the voter rolls accurate. People do object to half assing the job by purging the rolls of every third Lopez, however.
I'm sure you have multiple links for your conspiracy theory -
Should we just go ahead and name these plays at this point? This could be like NE vs. the Rams during spygate.HHusky said:
I don't know anyone of consequence who opposes making the voter rolls accurate. People do object to half assing the job by purging the rolls of every third Lopez, however. -
Who gives a fuck if someone is? It's neither a serious argument nor a relevant one.SFGbob said:
Nobody is saying voter fraud is a myth. -
Yeah, just the entire Rat party political leadership in California and across the country but no one of consequence. You're such a fucking hack Dazzler.HHusky said:
I don't know anyone of consequence who opposes making the voter rolls accurate. People do object to half assing the job by purging the rolls of every third Lopez, however. -
The verification process here in California to ensure that a non-citizen isn't registering to vote is based entirely on the honor system. There is no cross check of any Federal database to determine whether someone is or is not a citizen.
The voter registration database, though, does not include official citizenship documents, according to Padilla’s office.
Instead, it indicates whether applicants affirmed their eligibility status because they had to “declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California” they are a U.S. citizen and resident of California and at least 16 years old, not currently in a state or federal prison or on parole for the conviction of a felony and not currently found mentally incompetent to vote by a court.
The applicant must also verify he or she understands it’s is a crime to intentionally provide incorrect information and that the information on the registration form is true and correct.
https://www.sacbee.com/article235686972.html
