Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Why is it so fucking hard for so many people to admit...
Comments
-
its not the virus hes beating in his beddoogie said: -
-
Leave the history to the pros, pal. This ain’t your wheelhouse.salemcoog said: -
Not at all true, Truman had the nutsack to end the war, but FDR did put the Japanese, Germans, and Italians in cages after he forced them from their homes. You’re so stupid.ThomasFremont said: -
Huh?NorthwestFresh said: -
Your mastery of Greek mythology isn’t dazzling anyone around here.ThomasFremont said: -
That’s fine. I’ll leave the pederast stuff to you.salemcoog said: -
ThomasFremont said:
I don’t care about your point. FDR was a fuck up an extended the depression. Truman won WWII. Simple fact.ThomasFremont said:
-
Tommy @ThomasFremont also never learned of FDR’s internment camps at his Softy JC.MikeDamone said:
Tommy is a LEGEND though. -
German and Italian internment camps???NorthwestFresh said:
Tommy is a LEGEND though. -
Stalin gets credit for 8 2/3 strong innings.MikeDamone said:
-
Nobody is questioning the heat Truman brought as a closer.PurpleThrobber said: -
Double-Whooooosh. Tommie "The Legend" still doesn't get it. Keep trying kid.ThomasFremont said: -
Besides, FDR won WWII, so he can pop off.
Leave the history to the pros, pal. This ain’t your wheelhouse.
Source: @ThomasFremont: The Legend, the History Pro, and Pal.
Good think I have @ThomasFremont around to remind me that the Great Depression lasted only 4 years and it was FDR who dropped the Atomic Bombs on Japan that won WW2.
So I guess it wasn't over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor, right Tommy?
Leave history to the pros, pal.
Indeed. POTD -
The atomic bomb didn’t win WWII, are you that simple?TurdBomber said:Besides, FDR won WWII, so he can pop off.
Leave the history to the pros, pal. This ain’t your wheelhouse.
Source: @ThomasFremont: The Legend, the History Pro, and Pal.
Good think I have @ThomasFremont around to remind me that the Great Depression lasted only 4 years and it was FDR who dropped the Atomic Bombs on Japan that won WW2.
So I guess it wasn't over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor, right Tommy?
Leave history to the pros, pal.
Indeed. POTD -
Okay, I'll play along. Let's hear the Revisions, SlowTommy.ThomasFremont said:
What won WW2, SlowTommy? -
We would have won eventually. Dropping the bomb only saved a million lives. An invasion of Japan would have been costly. After all, I probably wouldn’t exist.
-
For tommy types a million lives would have been worth not nuking those evil bastards.
-
bumpTurdBomber said:
What won WW2, SlowTommy? -
Proud Japan was preparing for an amphibious invasion, and prepared to defend their homeland to the last man/woman/child. Dropping the bomb changed the game, and sent the message that we had more from where that came from and that, either way, there would be no fight. The war ends now. People talk about Truman agonizing over the decision, but it was really his only option, given where things were heading.
-
We killed more with the fire bombings than the nukes killed. Of course I was told if a place got nuked no one could survive there for half a million years. Seems my teachers were wrong. Nagasaki and Hiroshima seem rather lively.
-
VE Day came before we dropped the bomb. Japan was pushed back to the home islands cut off from resources and allies before we dropped the bomb. The bomb sped up the timeline of the Japanese surrender, but they were finished with or without it.TurdBomber said:
What won WW2, SlowTommy?
If you want to make the case that the bomb saved us the trouble of invading the home islands, I’m all good. But that wasn’t your point. If you want to argue the bomb halted further Soviet expansion since we got it FIRST!!1! I’d hear what you had to say. Still would have nothing to do with winning WWII.
Saying the atomic bomb “won” the war is like saying the third string freshman phenom RB “won” the game because he scored a highlight garbage time TD as the clock expired up 4 scores.
-
There is fair debate on the impact (lol) of The Bomb, but that's a bad analogy.ThomasFremont said:
If you want to make the case that the bomb saved us the trouble of invading the home islands, I’m all good. But that wasn’t your point. If you want to argue the bomb halted further Soviet expansion since we got it FIRST!!1! I’d hear what you had to say. Still would have nothing to do with winning WWII.
Saying the atomic bomb “won” the war is like saying the third string freshman phenom RB “won” the game because he scored a highlight garbage time TD as the clock expired up 4 scores. -
Football games aren’t won on the last play. Especially when you already have a huge lead.GrundleStiltzkin said:
WWII wasn’t won by the “last” bomb either.
The freshman RB represents the new weapon that will dominate the future (the bomb).
I thought it was ok, as analogies go. But I’m open to notes. Should I have said he scored 2 TDs??? -
The Legend and History Pro @ThomasFremont excels at bad analogies.GrundleStiltzkin said:
And gee, although I wasn't around at the time, my history profs at UW made a pretty good case that Japan SURRENDERED - YOU STUPID FUCKS - AFTER the US dropped the 2nd atomic bomb on Nagasaki.
I'm sure the @ThomasFremonts of the world will be debating what should've, could've or would've happened in the weeks, months, or years after the skies over Japan went flash-boom-bang, but that Japanese surrender thingy will always be there to confound their discussions and conclusions about what NEVER ACTUALLY happened.
Carry on, Revisionists. -
it was the detonation that did itThomasFremont said: -
I never said we shouldn’t have dropped the bomb. I’m saying Japan had no path to victory by that point. If they needed to get a-bombed twice to see it that’s their problem. Fewer Americans dead.TurdBomber said:
And gee, although I wasn't around at the time, my history profs at UW made a pretty good case that Japan SURRENDERED - YOU STUPID FUCKS - AFTER the US dropped the 2nd atomic bomb on Nagasaki.
I'm sure the @ThomasFremonts of the world will be debating what should've, could've or would've happened in the weeks, months, or years after the skies over Japan went flash-boom-bang, but that Japanese surrender thingy will always be there to confound their discussions and conclusions about what NEVER ACTUALLY happened.
Carry on, Revisionists.
Tell us more how the bomb “won” the war. Even though half of the war was already won, and Japan was running on fumes...
I expected more than this, you’re struggling here. -
Projections aren’t results. It’s why we play the games
-
Big Giant Boom, times two, followed by "surrender."ThomasFremont said:
Tell us more how the bomb “won” the war. Even though half of the war was already won, and Japan was running on fumes...
I expected more than this, you’re struggling here.
What's a White Flag mean, Tommy? How about "throwing in the towel" or "conceding victory" to the opponent? Mere formalities?
You are growing dumber by the post. It's a rare sight, but, by all means, keep shitting all over yourself for all to see. -
Real History ace we have here guys.ThomasFremont said:
If you want to make the case that the bomb saved us the trouble of invading the home islands, I’m all good. But that wasn’t your point. If you want to argue the bomb halted further Soviet expansion since we got it FIRST!!1! I’d hear what you had to say. Still would have nothing to do with winning WWII.
Saying the atomic bomb “won” the war is like saying the third string freshman phenom RB “won” the game because he scored a highlight garbage time TD as the clock expired up 4 scores.