Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Noted conservative heard from

1234568»

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,337

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    I don't need to scream racist. You do that well enough on your own.

    Sorry to have upset you ladies.

    Even those of us who identified as Republicans at the time knew GHWB's "most qualified" candidate line was a whopper.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,553 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    I don't need to scream racist. You do that well enough on your own.

    Sorry to have upset you ladies.

    Even those of us who identified as Republicans at the time knew GHWB's "most qualified" candidate line was a whopper.
    The racist speaks
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    edited May 2020

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    I don't need to scream racist. You do that well enough on your own.

    Sorry to have upset you ladies.

    Even those of us who identified as Republicans at the time knew GHWB's "most qualified" candidate line was a whopper.
    The racist rat speaks squeals
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072

    W was selected not elected

    Just what I am hearing

    Chad is no match for


  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    Nobody does racism as well as a liberal.