https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376 Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities. Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting. (not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)
https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Tail end of story said why KING5 sat on the story I also say it’s super fishy that those videos can’t be re-discovered ... computer forensics can be pretty damning and this should be a layup
https://twitter.com/geescottjr/status/1250630127727210498 Why did King5 make an editor's note clarifying that one random kid wasnt involved. That seems...odd Yep just said the same thing in the Wam.Something really weird about exonerating one and only one individual.And the wording is funny too. The police reports explicitly state Scott wasn’t involved? That seems extremely unlikely.
https://twitter.com/geescottjr/status/1250630127727210498 Why did King5 make an editor's note clarifying that one random kid wasnt involved. That seems...odd
https://twitter.com/geescottjr/status/1250630127727210498
https://twitter.com/geescottjr/status/1250630127727210498 Why did King5 make an editor's note clarifying that one random kid wasnt involved. That seems...odd Yep just said the same thing in the Wam.Something really weird about exonerating one and only one individual.And the wording is funny too. The police reports explicitly state Scott wasn’t involved? That seems extremely unlikely. It doesn't seem odd to me. King 5 had access to all the police reports, and given that it's been widely assumed that Gee was one of the "three football players who received scholarships from prestigious universities", the disclaimer seems pretty necessary. As big of a boob Gee Sr. is, he should absolutely try to clear his son's name. Now the question is who is that third player? Hopefully not our guy.
Or EXONERATED but well done
https://twitter.com/geescottjr/status/1250630127727210498 Why did King5 make an editor's note clarifying that one random kid wasnt involved. That seems...odd Yep just said the same thing in the Wam.Something really weird about exonerating one and only one individual.And the wording is funny too. The police reports explicitly state Scott wasn’t involved? That seems extremely unlikely. It doesn't seem odd to me. King 5 had access to all the police reports, and given that it's been widely assumed that Gee was one of the "three football players who received scholarships from prestigious universities", the disclaimer seems pretty necessary. As big of a boob Gee Sr. is, he should absolutely try to clear his son's name. Now the question is who is that third player? Hopefully not our guy. Gee Sr is a douchebag, but the lust for blood, especially when they are saying Gee Jr wasn’t involved is pretty pathetic.
I think Hector's mom is a lawyer.
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.) How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.