Eastside Catholic stuff

It's not hard to find information. Enough with the faggy cryptic posting and/or people acting like this is some top secret FBI shit.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CFB/comments/foutcv/stanford_football_players_family_sues_to_keep/

And click to view the PDF in the first search result hit here.

https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-att-us-revc&ei=RpKWXue4B8ra-gTJzqyIBQ&q=eastside+Catholic+players+sexual+assault&oq=eastside+Catholic+players+sexual+assault&gs_lcp=ChNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwEAM6CAgAEAgQDRAeOgcIIRAKEKABOgIIKToGCAAQFhAeOgUIIRCrAjoICCEQFhAdEB46BQghEKABUMyhAliWpgNglK0DaABwAHgAgAFwiAGgF5IBBDM2LjGYAQCgAQE&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

OreDawg

https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.

Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.

(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)

Proving a defamation suit is an incredibly high bar legally, I think that’s one of the most common misconceptions people have about the law. I’m not a lawyer, but to me this seems to be nowhere near reaching the standard of defamation. And if you sue and lose, which is the most likely thing in a defamation case by a mile, you often have to pay the attorneys fees (although I’m not sure this is true for Washington and I’m too lazy to look it up).

dirtysouwfdawg

Jesus.

So, Lemme get this straight ... If Gee senior wasn't such an ongoing asshole all this probably would have just remained in the shadows of rumor?

Good job Gee senior. Way to add gasoline to the smoldering ashes and relight the fire...
He pissed of the wrong people

To be fair, who hasn’t senior douche pissed off...

FremontTroll

https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.

Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.

(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)
Proving a defamation suit is an incredibly high bar legally, I think that’s one of the most common misconceptions people have about the law. I’m not a lawyer, but to me this seems to be nowhere near reaching the standard of defamation. And if you sue and lose, which is the most likely thing in a defamation case by a mile, you often have to pay the attorneys fees (although I’m not sure this is true for Washington and I’m too lazy to look it up).

Elon Musk called one of the Thai cave rescue divers a "pedo guy" on twitter to his millions of followers, doubled down with "betcha a signed dollar its true", and then tripled down in an email to a buzzfeed reporter asking buzzfeed to look into it and insinuating the pedo claim was factual and based on an investigation he had done.*

Jury took 20 minutes to acquit.

*turned out a British ex-con scammed Elon for $50k and pretended to do an investigation to prove the guy was indeed a pedophile but did nothing.

FireCohen

https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.

Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.

(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)

@creepycoug

GrundleStiltzkin

http://twitter.com/coker_UDub/status/1250576069570117633

http://twitter.com/coker_UDub/status/1250577771958374401

BeerThirty

jhfstyle24

I am interested to see what happens to the other players known to be involved. Hector filmed and sent it yes but he didn't engage in the activity.

I would be highly, highly surprised to see OSU do the right thing here.

bananasnblondes

So, obviously we're not posting it here, but are the names of the other 4 or 5 100% confirmed to be known or are we just speculating?

BeerThirty

tOSU won't do the right thing. Wilcox will. He is a Pete guy

FireCohen

tOSU won't do the right thing. Wilcox will. He is a Pete guy

So winners win

BeerThirty

tOSU won't do the right thing. Wilcox will. He is a Pete guy
So winners win

Seems that way

jhfstyle24

So, obviously we're not posting it here, but are the names of the other 4 or 5 100% confirmed to be known or are we just speculating?

They are known. Not speculation.

CallMeBigErn

So, obviously we're not posting it here, but are the names of the other 4 or 5 100% confirmed to be known or are we just speculating?
They are known. Not speculation.

There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know.

jhfstyle24

So, obviously we're not posting it here, but are the names of the other 4 or 5 100% confirmed to be known or are we just speculating?
They are known. Not speculation.
There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know.

Unless YOU have proof in HAND...it’s speculation for YOU. ‘Those who know’....meaning YOU are not a ‘THOSE’. I didn’t create the English language but ‘speculation’ is pretty cut and dry. Unless you are an eye witness, YOU are speculating. Word of mouth is not proof.

Baseman

https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.

Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.

(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)
Proving a defamation suit is an incredibly high bar legally, I think that’s one of the most common misconceptions people have about the law. I’m not a lawyer, but to me this seems to be nowhere near reaching the standard of defamation. And if you sue and lose, which is the most likely thing in a defamation case by a mile, you often have to pay the attorneys fees (although I’m not sure this is true for Washington and I’m too lazy to look it up).

To get fees, the respondent would have to prove the suit was frivolous. There are plenty of arguments the “aggrieved” can make. So, getting fees ain’t happening.

As far as the claim. King 5 got the FOIA documents months ago and so far sat on the story. That should tell you something.

Often in these situations, deep pocketed plaintiffs file suit and paper the other side with discovery requests. If the respondent is a minor with rich parents, it gets interesting.

Ill LIPO and just be peepin’ Either way...

RatherBeBrewing

https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.

Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.

(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)
Proving a defamation suit is an incredibly high bar legally, I think that’s one of the most common misconceptions people have about the law. I’m not a lawyer, but to me this seems to be nowhere near reaching the standard of defamation. And if you sue and lose, which is the most likely thing in a defamation case by a mile, you often have to pay the attorneys fees (although I’m not sure this is true for Washington and I’m too lazy to look it up).

Defamation suits are one of the biggest wastes of time. You have to prove negligence, harm, and that the statement was maliciously false.

Also, anytime you file suit on someone it should be because they have assets or insurance worth your time. Suing an 18 year old running a parody twitter account is a waste of time unless you like burning money for no reason.

Baseman

http://twitter.com/aydenhector2/status/1250576764926963712?s=21

bananasnblondes

http://twitter.com/aydenhector2/status/1250576764926963712?s=21

Very careful wording there

FireCohen

http://twitter.com/aydenhector2/status/1250576764926963712?s=21

Recording the whole thing is all of a sudden just witness

FireCohen

This reply is savage

https://twitter.com/JBP_Official/status/1250585167392935936

Tequilla

http://twitter.com/aydenhector2/status/1250576764926963712?s=21

What’s the frequency that a Stanford football recruit is told in April AFTER committing and signing a LOI to LEAVE!!!

jhfstyle24

This reply is savage
https://twitter.com/JBP_Official/status/1250585167392935936

That guy made some pretty sick highlights for UW a few years back

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gnz6MPmtp4E

MakaDawg

https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.

Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.

(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)
Proving a defamation suit is an incredibly high bar legally, I think that’s one of the most common misconceptions people have about the law. I’m not a lawyer, but to me this seems to be nowhere near reaching the standard of defamation. And if you sue and lose, which is the most likely thing in a defamation case by a mile, you often have to pay the attorneys fees (although I’m not sure this is true for Washington and I’m too lazy to look it up).
Defamation suits are one of the biggest wastes of time. You have to prove negligence, harm, and that the statement was maliciously false.

Also, anytime you file suit on someone it should be because they have assets or insurance worth your time. Suing an 18 year old running a parody twitter account is a waste of time unless you like burning money for no reason.

Thought the malice part only applies to public figures? Unless you can make the argument prominent high school athletes are public figures (hmm). Moot point though because there is no clear disregard for the truth in publishing/referencing a police report, right? In fact, the opposite.

Studying for the Bar (or should be), but instead am relying on a teen boi recruiting site for legal tidbits. I know I’ll pass..

WilburHooksHands

so much for catholics vs convicts

FireCohen

If he went to UW, would our ppl try to bury the story

jhfstyle24

If he went to UW, would our ppl try to bury the story

We didn't offer DJ Rogers. There's a reason for that.

BeerThirty

If he went to UW, would our ppl try to bury the story
We didn't offer DJ Rogers. There's a reason for that.

Was DJ playing the BBC in Hector's production?

FremontTroll

http://twitter.com/aydenhector2/status/1250576764926963712?s=21
Recording the whole thing is all of a sudden just witness

He did a very thorough job as witness.

GreenRiverGatorz

http://twitter.com/aydenhector2/status/1250576764926963712?s=21

It's not often that a recently booted student athlete goes full lawyer and PR mode. Buckle up baby.

RaceBannon

I never blame a kid for losing a Stanford education

Comments

OreDawg

https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.

Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.

(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)

dirtysouwfdawg

Jesus.

So, Lemme get this straight ... If Gee senior wasn't such an ongoing asshole all this probably would have just remained in the shadows of rumor?

Good job Gee senior. Way to add gasoline to the smoldering ashes and relight the fire...
He pissed of the wrong people

To be fair, who hasn’t senior douche pissed off...

FremontTroll

https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.

Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.

(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)
Proving a defamation suit is an incredibly high bar legally, I think that’s one of the most common misconceptions people have about the law. I’m not a lawyer, but to me this seems to be nowhere near reaching the standard of defamation. And if you sue and lose, which is the most likely thing in a defamation case by a mile, you often have to pay the attorneys fees (although I’m not sure this is true for Washington and I’m too lazy to look it up).

FireCohen

https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.

Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.

(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)

@creepycoug

GrundleStiltzkin

http://twitter.com/coker_UDub/status/1250576069570117633

http://twitter.com/coker_UDub/status/1250577771958374401

BeerThirty

jhfstyle24

bananasnblondes

So, obviously we're not posting it here, but are the names of the other 4 or 5 100% confirmed to be known or are we just speculating?

BeerThirty

tOSU won't do the right thing. Wilcox will. He is a Pete guy

FireCohen

tOSU won't do the right thing. Wilcox will. He is a Pete guy

So winners win

BeerThirty

tOSU won't do the right thing. Wilcox will. He is a Pete guy
So winners win

Seems that way

jhfstyle24

So, obviously we're not posting it here, but are the names of the other 4 or 5 100% confirmed to be known or are we just speculating?

They are known. Not speculation.

CallMeBigErn

So, obviously we're not posting it here, but are the names of the other 4 or 5 100% confirmed to be known or are we just speculating?
They are known. Not speculation.

jhfstyle24

So, obviously we're not posting it here, but are the names of the other 4 or 5 100% confirmed to be known or are we just speculating?
They are known. Not speculation.
There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know.

Baseman

https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.

Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.

(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)
Proving a defamation suit is an incredibly high bar legally, I think that’s one of the most common misconceptions people have about the law. I’m not a lawyer, but to me this seems to be nowhere near reaching the standard of defamation. And if you sue and lose, which is the most likely thing in a defamation case by a mile, you often have to pay the attorneys fees (although I’m not sure this is true for Washington and I’m too lazy to look it up).

RatherBeBrewing

https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.

Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.

(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)
Proving a defamation suit is an incredibly high bar legally, I think that’s one of the most common misconceptions people have about the law. I’m not a lawyer, but to me this seems to be nowhere near reaching the standard of defamation. And if you sue and lose, which is the most likely thing in a defamation case by a mile, you often have to pay the attorneys fees (although I’m not sure this is true for Washington and I’m too lazy to look it up).

Baseman

http://twitter.com/aydenhector2/status/1250576764926963712?s=21

bananasnblondes

http://twitter.com/aydenhector2/status/1250576764926963712?s=21

Very careful wording there

FireCohen

http://twitter.com/aydenhector2/status/1250576764926963712?s=21

Recording the whole thing is all of a sudden just witness

FireCohen

This reply is savage

https://twitter.com/JBP_Official/status/1250585167392935936

Tequilla

http://twitter.com/aydenhector2/status/1250576764926963712?s=21

What’s the frequency that a Stanford football recruit is told in April AFTER committing and signing a LOI to LEAVE!!!

jhfstyle24

This reply is savage
https://twitter.com/JBP_Official/status/1250585167392935936

That guy made some pretty sick highlights for UW a few years back

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gnz6MPmtp4E

MakaDawg

https://twitter.com/cfbquotes/status/1250280245992677376
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.

Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.

(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)
Proving a defamation suit is an incredibly high bar legally, I think that’s one of the most common misconceptions people have about the law. I’m not a lawyer, but to me this seems to be nowhere near reaching the standard of defamation. And if you sue and lose, which is the most likely thing in a defamation case by a mile, you often have to pay the attorneys fees (although I’m not sure this is true for Washington and I’m too lazy to look it up).
Defamation suits are one of the biggest wastes of time. You have to prove negligence, harm, and that the statement was maliciously false.

Also, anytime you file suit on someone it should be because they have assets or insurance worth your time. Suing an 18 year old running a parody twitter account is a waste of time unless you like burning money for no reason.

WilburHooksHands

so much for catholics vs convicts

FireCohen

If he went to UW, would our ppl try to bury the story

jhfstyle24

If he went to UW, would our ppl try to bury the story

We didn't offer DJ Rogers. There's a reason for that.

BeerThirty

If he went to UW, would our ppl try to bury the story
We didn't offer DJ Rogers. There's a reason for that.

Was DJ playing the BBC in Hector's production?

FremontTroll

http://twitter.com/aydenhector2/status/1250576764926963712?s=21
Recording the whole thing is all of a sudden just witness

He did a very thorough job as witness.

GreenRiverGatorz

http://twitter.com/aydenhector2/status/1250576764926963712?s=21

It's not often that a recently booted student athlete goes full lawyer and PR mode. Buckle up baby.

RaceBannon

I never blame a kid for losing a Stanford education