Pelosi on Cramer just now

Pitchfork51 said:

dnc said:

DuckHHunterisafag said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.

Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.

He can't and is always playing both sides. At some point in your life, you need to fucking take a stand. I don't give a fuck what some RAT thinks of me. I have enough friends and plenty of success in my life without having to care what some dipshit liberal thinks.

Hi there.

I enjoy pissing off people on both sides.

The idea this is some attempt at being more liked is retarded.

Hope that helps.

You love nancy pelosi and crave the admiration of fellow democrats

MelloDawg said:

DuckHHunterisafag said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.

Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.

I never said shit about a slush fund.

If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.

What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.

I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.

This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.

Do you think all of the inclusions in Pelosi’s bill will make it to the final draft? I certainly don’t. My opinion was this was an initial foray for her and then they meet in the middle because yes, many of the provisions are a little silly

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

DuckHHunterisafag said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.

Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.

I never said shit about a slush fund.

If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.

What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.

I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.

This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.

Do you think all of the inclusions in Pelosi’s bill will make it to the final draft? I certainly don’t. My opinion was this was an initial foray for her and then they meet in the middle because yes, many of the provisions are a little silly

Needs more Solar Industry Subsidies. And Trannies on Corporate Boreds. That about evens it out, in a Lib's mind.

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.

Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.

I never said shit about a slush fund.

If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.

What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.

I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.

Okay, cite for me something the GOP put into the bill that even goes a little way to coming close to it. I'll wait here while you look.

I don't need to look it up. I know how Mitch McConnell operates.

Yeah, I don't need no stinking facts, I have very, very strong feelings.

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.

Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.

I never said shit about a slush fund.

If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.

What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.

I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.

Okay, cite for me something the GOP put into the bill that even goes a little way to coming close to it. I'll wait here while you look.

I don't need to look it up. I know how Mitch McConnell operates.

Yeah, I don't need no stinking facts, I have very, very strong feelings.

History is feelings in your world?

K.