Pelosi on Cramer just now

dnc · March 2020

Now ask yourself why he's been the top GOP in the Senate all this tim.

dnc · March 2020

Pitchfork51 said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

DuckHHunterisafag said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:
Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
He can't and is always playing both sides. At some point in your life, you need to fucking take a stand. I don't give a fuck what some RAT thinks of me. I have enough friends and plenty of success in my life without having to care what some dipshit liberal thinks.
Hi there.

I enjoy pissing off people on both sides.

The idea this is some attempt at being more liked is retarded.

Hope that helps.
You love nancy pelosi and crave the admiration of fellow democrats

This guys gets me

Sledog · March 2020

TurdBomber · March 2020

MelloDawg said:

show previous quotes
DuckHHunterisafag said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:
Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
I never said shit about a slush fund.

If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.
Do you think all of the inclusions in Pelosi’s bill will make it to the final draft? I certainly don’t. My opinion was this was an initial foray for her and then they meet in the middle because yes, many of the provisions are a little silly

Needs more Solar Industry Subsidies. And Trannies on Corporate Boreds. That about evens it out, in a Lib's mind.

RaceBannon · March 2020

dnc said:

show previous quotes
RaceBannon said:
The reason the left is still crying about Garland is because it is the one time in Mitch's life that he did something worthwhile that his base wanted.

It stands out
We agree McConnell is worthless.

The GOP is worthless. They wasted Trump's two years where something could have got done. That's all a president gets. Then the opposition takes over a house and you run for re election and as soon as you are re elected you are a lame duck and everyone is running for 2024

Obama got Obamacare his first two years and that was about it

The problem with adding more parties is that they just bring their own shopping list to the party and want their share. The graft involved to put together a government in a multi party system is impressive

There is no such thing as a two party system in America which has amused me for decades because most people think its the law

MelloDawg · March 2020

TurdBomber said:

show previous quotes
MelloDawg said:

DuckHHunterisafag said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:
Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
I never said shit about a slush fund.

If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.
Do you think all of the inclusions in Pelosi’s bill will make it to the final draft? I certainly don’t. My opinion was this was an initial foray for her and then they meet in the middle because yes, many of the provisions are a little silly
Needs more Solar Industry Subsidies. And Trannies on Corporate Boreds. That about evens it out, in a Lib's mind.

I forgot about the trannies provision. Cease negotiations!

SFGbob · March 2020

dnc said:

show previous quotes
SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:
Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
I never said shit about a slush fund.

If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
Okay, cite for me something the GOP put into the bill that even goes a little way to coming close to it. I'll wait here while you look.
I don't need to look it up. I know how Mitch McConnell operates.

Yeah, I don't need no stinking facts, I have very, very strong feelings.

dnc · March 2020

SFGbob said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:
Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
I never said shit about a slush fund.

If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
Okay, cite for me something the GOP put into the bill that even goes a little way to coming close to it. I'll wait here while you look.
I don't need to look it up. I know how Mitch McConnell operates.
Yeah, I don't need no stinking facts, I have very, very strong feelings.

History is feelings in your world?

K.

Kaepsknee · March 2020

RaceBannon said:
Garland was dirty?

Disagree

Oh yeah.

SFGbob · March 2020

dnc said:

show previous quotes
SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:
Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
I never said shit about a slush fund.

If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
Okay, cite for me something the GOP put into the bill that even goes a little way to coming close to it. I'll wait here while you look.
I don't need to look it up. I know how Mitch McConnell operates.
Yeah, I don't need no stinking facts, I have very, very strong feelings.
History is feelings in your world?

K.

You feel that McConnell put something bad in this bill. You have no evidence that he did and you can't cite anything bad he put into the bill. But, but Merick Garland!!!! Great fucking argument.

LebamDawg · March 2020

MelloDawg said:

show previous quotes
DuckHHunterisafag said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:
Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
I never said shit about a slush fund.

If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.
Do you think all of the inclusions in Pelosi’s bill will make it to the final draft? I certainly don’t. My opinion was this was an initial foray for her and then they meet in the middle because yes, many of the provisions are a little silly

in the final draft - no, easily added into the final version after those bastards approve the draft. Then it gets it final tweaks (meaning add stuff back in) then gets entered into the record.

Final tweaks is the technical term for final edits.

dnc · March 2020

The issue is while they're haggling all this out people are losing jobs.

It's not the time for politics as usual. It's the time for Congress to do their jobs and prioritize the nation above their party.

Clearly they have no idea how to do that.

SFGbob · March 2020

dnc said:
The issue is while they're haggling all this out people are losing jobs.

It's not the time for politics as usual. It's the time for Congress to do their jobs and prioritize the nation above their party.

Clearly they have no idea how to do that.

Actually, they did have an idea on how to do that. They had a bill that was negotiated by both parties in the Senate that was ready for passage Sunday night. Pelosi and the Rats blew up that deal in order push a raft of left-wing bullshit like more tax credits for wind and solar. Instead of focusing your blame and anger at the people who are causing this delay you've decided that taking a "both sides do it" approach makes you appear thoughtful and above it all.

Kaepsknee · March 2020

https://twitter.com/realjameswoods/status/1242508406411284483?s=21

GrundleStiltzkin · March 2020

Lotta statists in this thread.

On both sides.

Pitchfork51 · March 2020

salemcoog said:
https://twitter.com/realjameswoods/status/1242508406411284483?s=21

"Her breasts .... What about her breasts"

RoadTrip · March 2020

dnc said:

show previous quotes
DuckHHunterisafag said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:

SFGbob said:

dnc said:
Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

Both sides need to DIAFF.
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
I never said shit about a slush fund.

If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.
The McConnell GOP has played very dirty on a number of occasions. The SCOTUS seat is the most notable example. I'm thrilled there's another pro life judge because of it but you don't pull something that dirty without the other side screwing you over in return. Retribution is coming. The GOP's dirtiness absolutely part of the problem.

It's not just a democratic issue.

Both sides suck and we need a viable third (and hopefully fourth) party in this nation yesterday.

Here's where I would say Mellodawg's analysis fits. Was it dirty? Yes but people's lives were not literally on the line as is the case right now. Elections in normal times have consequesnces and the Senate belonged to the GOP when we had a shitty progressive president trying to remake the country in his image.

LebamDawg · March 2020

Dems made sure our native Americans were included

https://twitter.com/TheBabylonBee/status/1242224670453256193

Sledog · March 2020

Pelosi on Cramer just now

Comments

Welcome!

Welcome!

Quick Links