Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Pelosi on Cramer just now
Comments
-
I never said shit about a slush fund.SFGbob said:
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.dnc said:Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.
But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.
Both sides need to DIAFF.
You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.
And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.
Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense. -
He can't and is always playing both sides. At some point in your life, you need to fucking take a stand. I don't give a fuck what some RAT thinks of me. I have enough friends and plenty of success in my life without having to care what some dipshit liberal thinks.SFGbob said:
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.dnc said:Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.
But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.
Both sides need to DIAFF.
You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative. -
This is how negotiations on congressional bills work. The GOP presents an untenable argument, the Democrats do the same, they meet in the middle, both tell their constituents they won while the other was wrong the whole time.dnc said:
I never said shit about a slush fund.SFGbob said:
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.dnc said:Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.
But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.
Both sides need to DIAFF.
You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.
And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.
Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense. -
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.dnc said:
I never said shit about a slush fund.SFGbob said:
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.dnc said:Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.
But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.
Both sides need to DIAFF.
You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.
And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.
Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense. -
I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.SFGbob said:
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.dnc said:
I never said shit about a slush fund.SFGbob said:
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.dnc said:Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.
But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.
Both sides need to DIAFF.
You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.
And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.
Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense. -
Hi there.DuckHHunterisafag said:
He can't and is always playing both sides. At some point in your life, you need to fucking take a stand. I don't give a fuck what some RAT thinks of me. I have enough friends and plenty of success in my life without having to care what some dipshit liberal thinks.SFGbob said:
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.dnc said:Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.
But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.
Both sides need to DIAFF.
You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
I enjoy pissing off people on both sides.
The idea this is some attempt at being more liked is retarded.
Hope that helps. -
This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.dnc said:
I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.SFGbob said:
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.dnc said:
I never said shit about a slush fund.SFGbob said:
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.dnc said:Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.
But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.
Both sides need to DIAFF.
You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.
And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.
Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense. -
You love nancy pelosi and crave the admiration of fellow democratsdnc said:
Hi there.DuckHHunterisafag said:
He can't and is always playing both sides. At some point in your life, you need to fucking take a stand. I don't give a fuck what some RAT thinks of me. I have enough friends and plenty of success in my life without having to care what some dipshit liberal thinks.SFGbob said:
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.dnc said:Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.
But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.
Both sides need to DIAFF.
You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
I enjoy pissing off people on both sides.
The idea this is some attempt at being more liked is retarded.
Hope that helps. -
Both sides do it has long been the abject admission of guilt by the left. Its the best they can do
@dnc isn't the left. He's just a bully -
Do you think all of the inclusions in Pelosi’s bill will make it to the final draft? I certainly don’t. My opinion was this was an initial foray for her and then they meet in the middle because yes, many of the provisions are a little sillyDuckHHunterisafag said:
This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.dnc said:
I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.SFGbob said:
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.dnc said:
I never said shit about a slush fund.SFGbob said:
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.dnc said:Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.
But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.
Both sides need to DIAFF.
You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.
And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.
Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
