Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pelosi on Cramer just now

PurpleThrobber
PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,069
in Tug Tavern
Lying fucking bitch.

"The easiest way to do this is to put aside some of our concerns for another day."

"They (the opposition) just want an ideological statement"

Then why the FUCK did you put forth as 1200 page agenda-driven bill?

You cunty cunt. Fuck off.

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,009 Standard Supporter
    She truly is the devil.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,461 Founders Club
    Bendintheriver said:

    She truly is the devil.

    Wait. I'm hearing she doesn't have hate in her heart for anyone.

    Staff true?!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    Bendintheriver said:

    She truly is the devil.

    Well she certainly has never seen an abortion she didn't celebrate. How she can call herself a practicing Catholic is amazing. Her days are numbered on this planet and she needs to destroy as much as she can in order set her family up for another 100 years of CA control.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Please provide the list and we'll compare and contrast. Your opinion of both sides are equally bad is not supported by the facts.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KimsCopperPenny
    KimsCopperPenny Member Posts: 262
    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    fuck off. there's nothing in there for performing art centers or shit like that
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    DuckHHunterisafag said:



    Please provide the list and we'll compare and contrast. Your opinion of both sides are equally bad is not supported by the facts.

    I didn't say both sides are equally bad.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:



    Please provide the list and we'll compare and contrast. Your opinion of both sides are equally bad is not supported by the facts.

    I didn't say both sides are equally bad.
    They both need to die in a fucking fire doesn't reflect this?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    I never said shit about a slush fund.

    If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

    And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

    Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    He can't and is always playing both sides. At some point in your life, you need to fucking take a stand. I don't give a fuck what some RAT thinks of me. I have enough friends and plenty of success in my life without having to care what some dipshit liberal thinks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,846
    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    I never said shit about a slush fund.

    If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

    And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

    Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
    This is how negotiations on congressional bills work. The GOP presents an untenable argument, the Democrats do the same, they meet in the middle, both tell their constituents they won while the other was wrong the whole time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    I never said shit about a slush fund.

    If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

    And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

    Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
    What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    I never said shit about a slush fund.

    If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

    And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

    Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
    What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
    I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    He can't and is always playing both sides. At some point in your life, you need to fucking take a stand. I don't give a fuck what some RAT thinks of me. I have enough friends and plenty of success in my life without having to care what some dipshit liberal thinks.
    Hi there.

    I enjoy pissing off people on both sides.

    The idea this is some attempt at being more liked is retarded.

    Hope that helps.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    I never said shit about a slush fund.

    If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

    And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

    Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
    What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
    I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
    This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,882 Founders Club
    Both sides do it has long been the abject admission of guilt by the left. Its the best they can do

    @dnc isn't the left. He's just a bully
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,846
    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    I never said shit about a slush fund.

    If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

    And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

    Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
    What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
    I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
    This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.
    Do you think all of the inclusions in Pelosi’s bill will make it to the final draft? I certainly don’t. My opinion was this was an initial foray for her and then they meet in the middle because yes, many of the provisions are a little silly
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    MelloDawg said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    I never said shit about a slush fund.

    If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

    And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

    Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
    What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
    I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
    This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.
    Do you think all of the inclusions in Pelosi’s bill will make it to the final draft? I certainly don’t. My opinion was this was an initial foray for her and then they meet in the middle because yes, many of the provisions are a little silly
    Did you just wake up man? This isn't a standard, run-of-the-mill bill. RATs are screaming like stuck pigs about how not enough is being done in an incredibly tough and challenging time. Wasting our time with this RAT BS is literally killing people but you're analysis is it's brilliant political strategy??? GTFO and stop pulling our legs. I'm not buying your shtick.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited March 2020
    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    I never said shit about a slush fund.

    If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

    And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

    Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
    What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
    I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
    Okay, cite for me something the GOP put into the bill that even goes a little way to coming close to it. I'll wait here while you look.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    I never said shit about a slush fund.

    If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

    And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

    Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
    What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
    I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
    This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.
    The McConnell GOP has played very dirty on a number of occasions. The SCOTUS seat is the most notable example. I'm thrilled there's another pro life judge because of it but you don't pull something that dirty without the other side screwing you over in return. Retribution is coming. The GOP's dirtiness absolutely part of the problem.

    It's not just a democratic issue.

    Both sides suck and we need a viable third (and hopefully fourth) party in this nation yesterday.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,882 Founders Club
    Garland was dirty?

    Disagree
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    dnc said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    I never said shit about a slush fund.

    If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

    And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

    Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
    What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
    I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
    This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.
    The McConnell GOP has played very dirty on a number of occasions. The SCOTUS seat is the most notable example. I'm thrilled there's another pro life judge because of it but you don't pull something that dirty without the other side screwing you over in return. Retribution is coming. The GOP's dirtiness absolutely part of the problem.

    It's not just a democratic issue.

    Both sides suck and we need a viable third (and hopefully fourth) party in this nation yesterday.
    What a coward.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    I never said shit about a slush fund.

    If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

    And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

    Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
    What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
    I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
    Okay, cite for me something the GOP put into the bill that even goes a little way to coming close to it. I'll wait here while you look.
    I don't need to look it up. I know how Mitch McConnell operates.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,882 Founders Club
    The reason the left is still crying about Garland is because it is the one time in Mitch's life that he did something worthwhile that his base wanted.

    It stands out
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited March 2020
    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    MelloDawg said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    I never said shit about a slush fund.

    If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.

    And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.

    Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
    What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
    I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
    This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.
    Do you think all of the inclusions in Pelosi’s bill will make it to the final draft? I certainly don’t. My opinion was this was an initial foray for her and then they meet in the middle because yes, many of the provisions are a little silly
    Did you just wake up man? This isn't a standard, run-of-the-mill bill. RATs are screaming like stuck pigs about how not enough is being done in an incredibly tough and challenging time. Wasting our time with this RAT BS is literally killing people but you're analysis is it's brilliant political strategy??? GTFO and stop pulling our legs. I'm not buying your shtick.
    They had a bill that could have been passed Sunday night it was a bipartisan bill. The Rats blew it up for purely political reasons and these asswholes are trying to pull a "both sides do it" dodge.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    RaceBannon said:

    The reason the left is still crying about Garland is because it is the one time in Mitch's life that he did something worthwhile that his base wanted.

    It stands out

    We agree McConnell is worthless.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    Pitchfork51 said:

    dnc said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.

    But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.

    Both sides need to DIAFF.

    Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.

    You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
    He can't and is always playing both sides. At some point in your life, you need to fucking take a stand. I don't give a fuck what some RAT thinks of me. I have enough friends and plenty of success in my life without having to care what some dipshit liberal thinks.
    Hi there.

    I enjoy pissing off people on both sides.

    The idea this is some attempt at being more liked is retarded.

    Hope that helps.
    You love nancy pelosi and crave the admiration of fellow democrats
    Chinned just for bluntness. I have no opinion on it's accuracy, but it's a solid jab to the face.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter