Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Noted conservative heard from

124678

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,337

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,553 Founders Club
    @HHusky is a virulent racist

    Not news at all
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,545 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    I don't need to scream racist. You do that well enough on your own.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,337

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    I don't need to scream racist. You do that well enough on your own.

    Sorry to have upset you ladies.

    Even those of us who identified as Republicans at the time knew GHWB's "most qualified" candidate line was a whopper.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,337
    Sorry to have upset you ladies.

    Even those of us who identified as Republicans at the time knew GHWB's "most qualified" candidate line was a whopper.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    I hear he is a prop
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,680

    HHusky said:

    Sorry to have upset you ladies.

    Even those of us who identified as Republicans at the time knew GHWB's "most qualified" candidate line was a whopper.

    Noted sexist, too.

    I'm hearing sexism is worse than racism nowadays

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    And Obama doesn’t get into Columbia or Harvard Law or get elected to senate or the Presidency without being black.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,337
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    And Obama doesn’t get into Columbia or Harvard Law or get elected to senate or the Presidency without being black.
    I don't know whether Obama gets into Columbia or Harvard, but I don't think he gets to coast to the nomination in 2008 without being black. I doubt he gets the nomination at all in 2008 without being black. As you know, I've said that before. PT thinks that's a racist opinion, btw. Apparently you're a racist too in his book.