Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Noted conservative heard from

GreenRiverGatorz
GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
Not sure any conservative actually claims Rubin anymore. Articles like this fit her pretty squarely into the far left wing of today's democrats.

How dare the party push two old white men on America with plenty of QUALIFIED women in the race. Funny to hear so much hand wringing about the lack of women when the dem voters pretty clearly spoke up about who they want in the general.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/06/both-sanders-biden-should-com
«13

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Simple answer for the outraged feminists: Quit putting forth cunty bitches as candidates.

    Jr high election strategy 101 - popularity and likeability matter.

    Dumb bitches.

    Yeah, I'd vote for a woman. Just not one of those pushy, opinionated, bitchy type of women.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,616 Standard Supporter
    Not sure that I'd put Thatcher or Jean Kirkpatrick real high on the likability factor. But they were extremely competent and had some common sense. The fake Indian thought that LGBTQ pandering was a key campaign strategy. It wasn't. Go figure. I don't find Trump particularly likable. But I like a lot of his policies.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Yeah, a woman who knows her place. Someone who would do a little cooking and a little cleaning around the White House. That's the kind of woman I'd vote for. And it wouldn't hurt if she could dress up a little bit from time to time and look a little sexy.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Not sure that I'd put Thatcher or Jean Kirkpatrick real high on the likability factor. But they were extremely competent and had some common sense. The fake Indian thought that LGBTQ pandering was a key campaign strategy. It wasn't. Go figure. I don't find Trump particularly likable. But I like a lot of his policies.

    People forget the most important female pol of all time was a Tory. Also first women on the SCOTUS was appointed by a GOP pres.
    That's why Hillary omitted Thatcher when complying her list of "gutsy" women in politics. Doesn't fit the narrative so she is airbrushed out of history.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,616 Standard Supporter
    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,317 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    Not sure that I'd put Thatcher or Jean Kirkpatrick real high on the likability factor. But they were extremely competent and had some common sense. The fake Indian thought that LGBTQ pandering was a key campaign strategy. It wasn't. Go figure. I don't find Trump particularly likable. But I like a lot of his policies.

    People forget the most important female pol of all time was a Tory. Also first women on the SCOTUS was appointed by a GOP pres.
    That's why Hillary omitted Thatcher when complying her list of "gutsy" women in politics. Doesn't fit the narrative so she is airbrushed out of history.
    She’s unlikeable as hell. Hence, the myth that only Trump could have beaten her.

    Speaking of Bush 43, his being more “like able “ is why he beat Gore in the first place.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited March 2020

    SFGbob said:

    Not sure that I'd put Thatcher or Jean Kirkpatrick real high on the likability factor. But they were extremely competent and had some common sense. The fake Indian thought that LGBTQ pandering was a key campaign strategy. It wasn't. Go figure. I don't find Trump particularly likable. But I like a lot of his policies.

    People forget the most important female pol of all time was a Tory. Also first women on the SCOTUS was appointed by a GOP pres.
    That's why Hillary omitted Thatcher when complying her list of "gutsy" women in politics. Doesn't fit the narrative so she is airbrushed out of history.
    She’s unlikeable as hell. Hence, the myth that only Trump could have beaten her.

    Speaking of Bush 43, his being more “like able “ is why he beat Gore in the first place.
    Clinton fatigue, no controlling legal authority, and Gore's weirdo act during the debate. I guess that qualifies as likability.

    You could argue that Hillary lost that election for Gore.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,616 Standard Supporter
    I think that the dem and RINO adoption of open borders led to Trump's victory. At the core, if you can't support America First policies then you are vulnerable to a candidate that unapologetically does. I think Rubio would have been the republican nominee if he hadn't decided to be Schumer's little bitch and swallow for open borders. Amnesty now and closed border later worked once with Reagan and it was clear that Schumer had no interest in closing the border at some unidentified later date. Not sure that open borders Rubio would have won over the key states that Trump won.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,317 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Not sure that I'd put Thatcher or Jean Kirkpatrick real high on the likability factor. But they were extremely competent and had some common sense. The fake Indian thought that LGBTQ pandering was a key campaign strategy. It wasn't. Go figure. I don't find Trump particularly likable. But I like a lot of his policies.

    People forget the most important female pol of all time was a Tory. Also first women on the SCOTUS was appointed by a GOP pres.
    That's why Hillary omitted Thatcher when complying her list of "gutsy" women in politics. Doesn't fit the narrative so she is airbrushed out of history.
    She’s unlikeable as hell. Hence, the myth that only Trump could have beaten her.

    Speaking of Bush 43, his being more “like able “ is why he beat Gore in the first place.
    Clinton fatigue, no controlling legal authority, and Gore's weirdo act during the debate. I guess that qualifies as likability.

    You could argue that Hillary lost that election for Gore.
    PM me when Trump gets 50.7 of the popular vote in 2020 and I will gladly STFU.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Not sure that I'd put Thatcher or Jean Kirkpatrick real high on the likability factor. But they were extremely competent and had some common sense. The fake Indian thought that LGBTQ pandering was a key campaign strategy. It wasn't. Go figure. I don't find Trump particularly likable. But I like a lot of his policies.

    People forget the most important female pol of all time was a Tory. Also first women on the SCOTUS was appointed by a GOP pres.
    That's why Hillary omitted Thatcher when complying her list of "gutsy" women in politics. Doesn't fit the narrative so she is airbrushed out of history.
    She’s unlikeable as hell. Hence, the myth that only Trump could have beaten her.

    Speaking of Bush 43, his being more “like able “ is why he beat Gore in the first place.
    Clinton fatigue, no controlling legal authority, and Gore's weirdo act during the debate. I guess that qualifies as likability.

    You could argue that Hillary lost that election for Gore.
    PM me when Trump gets 50.7 of the popular vote in 2020 and I will gladly STFU.
    I don't really believe that you and I are disagreeing I'm just adding additional context.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963
    SFGbob said:

    Simple answer for the outraged feminists: Quit putting forth cunty bitches as candidates.

    Jr high election strategy 101 - popularity and likeability matter.

    Dumb bitches.

    Yeah, I'd vote for a woman. Just not one of those pushy, opinionated, bitchy type of women.
    Right! Who wants a “pushy” leader with opinions?

    Said without a trace of irony. Bravo!
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Not sure that I'd put Thatcher or Jean Kirkpatrick real high on the likability factor. But they were extremely competent and had some common sense. The fake Indian thought that LGBTQ pandering was a key campaign strategy. It wasn't. Go figure. I don't find Trump particularly likable. But I like a lot of his policies.

    People forget the most important female pol of all time was a Tory. Also first women on the SCOTUS was appointed by a GOP pres.
    That's why Hillary omitted Thatcher when complying her list of "gutsy" women in politics. Doesn't fit the narrative so she is airbrushed out of history.
    She’s unlikeable as hell. Hence, the myth that only Trump could have beaten her.

    Speaking of Bush 43, his being more “like able “ is why he beat Gore in the first place.
    Clinton fatigue, no controlling legal authority, and Gore's weirdo act during the debate. I guess that qualifies as likability.

    You could argue that Hillary lost that election for Gore.
    PM me when Trump gets 50.7 of the popular vote in 2020 and I will gladly STFU.
    Entirely possible. Maybe even probable.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Not sure that I'd put Thatcher or Jean Kirkpatrick real high on the likability factor. But they were extremely competent and had some common sense. The fake Indian thought that LGBTQ pandering was a key campaign strategy. It wasn't. Go figure. I don't find Trump particularly likable. But I like a lot of his policies.

    People forget the most important female pol of all time was a Tory. Also first women on the SCOTUS was appointed by a GOP pres.
    That's why Hillary omitted Thatcher when complying her list of "gutsy" women in politics. Doesn't fit the narrative so she is airbrushed out of history.
    She’s unlikeable as hell. Hence, the myth that only Trump could have beaten her.

    Speaking of Bush 43, his being more “like able “ is why he beat Gore in the first place.
    Clinton fatigue, no controlling legal authority, and Gore's weirdo act during the debate. I guess that qualifies as likability.

    You could argue that Hillary lost that election for Gore.
    PM me when Trump gets 50.7 of the popular vote in 2020 and I will gladly STFU.
    Lol. You’re not dumb. Stop it.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Simple answer for the outraged feminists: Quit putting forth cunty bitches as candidates.

    Jr high election strategy 101 - popularity and likeability matter.

    Dumb bitches.

    Yeah, I'd vote for a woman. Just not one of those pushy, opinionated, bitchy type of women.
    Right! Who wants a “pushy” leader with opinions?

    Said without a trace of irony. Bravo!
    Fish on!!!!!
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,317 Founders Club

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Not sure that I'd put Thatcher or Jean Kirkpatrick real high on the likability factor. But they were extremely competent and had some common sense. The fake Indian thought that LGBTQ pandering was a key campaign strategy. It wasn't. Go figure. I don't find Trump particularly likable. But I like a lot of his policies.

    People forget the most important female pol of all time was a Tory. Also first women on the SCOTUS was appointed by a GOP pres.
    That's why Hillary omitted Thatcher when complying her list of "gutsy" women in politics. Doesn't fit the narrative so she is airbrushed out of history.
    She’s unlikeable as hell. Hence, the myth that only Trump could have beaten her.

    Speaking of Bush 43, his being more “like able “ is why he beat Gore in the first place.
    Clinton fatigue, no controlling legal authority, and Gore's weirdo act during the debate. I guess that qualifies as likability.

    You could argue that Hillary lost that election for Gore.
    PM me when Trump gets 50.7 of the popular vote in 2020 and I will gladly STFU.
    Lol. You’re not dumb. Stop it.
    Lotta football left to be played. Let’s not get ahead of ourselves here guys.
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839

    I think that the dem and RINO adoption of open borders led to Trump's victory. At the core, if you can't support America First policies then you are vulnerable to a candidate that unapologetically does. I think Rubio would have been the republican nominee if he hadn't decided to be Schumer's little bitch and swallow for open borders. Amnesty now and closed border later worked once with Reagan and it was clear that Schumer had no interest in closing the border at some unidentified later date. Not sure that open borders Rubio would have won over the key states that Trump won.

    Rubio is a dumbfuck.

    He got shredded by Chris Christy, exposed for what he was ... an empty suit.

    Then he tried act like Trump and looked like a child.


  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited March 2020

    I think that the dem and RINO adoption of open borders led to Trump's victory. At the core, if you can't support America First policies then you are vulnerable to a candidate that unapologetically does. I think Rubio would have been the republican nominee if he hadn't decided to be Schumer's little bitch and swallow for open borders. Amnesty now and closed border later worked once with Reagan and it was clear that Schumer had no interest in closing the border at some unidentified later date. Not sure that open borders Rubio would have won over the key states that Trump won.

    The Dems push for illegals is the dumbest political move in history.

    Even the wokest of the woke doesn't truly believe in it beyond sticking it to the right.

    Normal people sure as fuck are turned off by it.

    No more asylum = no more cages. Case closed
    I don't know who you surround yourself with, but the woke suburban liberals who infest my Facebook feed are absolutely in favor of illegals and they see it as a human rights issue, with Trump as the internment camp warden.
    Woke suburban liberals have no skin in game and have more to gain by moral grandstanding and virtue signaling with their other white guilt ridden emotional dumb shits than they do by thinking critically and rationally.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,317 Founders Club

    I think that the dem and RINO adoption of open borders led to Trump's victory. At the core, if you can't support America First policies then you are vulnerable to a candidate that unapologetically does. I think Rubio would have been the republican nominee if he hadn't decided to be Schumer's little bitch and swallow for open borders. Amnesty now and closed border later worked once with Reagan and it was clear that Schumer had no interest in closing the border at some unidentified later date. Not sure that open borders Rubio would have won over the key states that Trump won.

    The Dems push for illegals is the dumbest political move in history.

    Even the wokest of the woke doesn't truly believe in it beyond sticking it to the right.

    Normal people sure as fuck are turned off by it.

    No more asylum = no more cages. Case closed
    I don't know who you surround yourself with, but the woke suburban liberals who infest my Facebook feed are absolutely in favor of illegals and they see it as a human rights issue, with Trump as the internment camp warden.
    Woke suburban liberals have no skin in game and have more to gain by moral grandstanding and virtue signaling with their other white guilt ridden emotional dumb shits than they do by thinking critically and rationally.
    I’m on the front line with these dip shits everyday. Some are close frens.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    I think that the dem and RINO adoption of open borders led to Trump's victory. At the core, if you can't support America First policies then you are vulnerable to a candidate that unapologetically does. I think Rubio would have been the republican nominee if he hadn't decided to be Schumer's little bitch and swallow for open borders. Amnesty now and closed border later worked once with Reagan and it was clear that Schumer had no interest in closing the border at some unidentified later date. Not sure that open borders Rubio would have won over the key states that Trump won.

    The Dems push for illegals is the dumbest political move in history.

    Even the wokest of the woke doesn't truly believe in it beyond sticking it to the right.

    Normal people sure as fuck are turned off by it.

    No more asylum = no more cages. Case closed
    I don't know who you surround yourself with, but the woke suburban liberals who infest my Facebook feed are absolutely in favor of illegals and they see it as a human rights issue, with Trump as the internment camp warden.
    Woke suburban liberals have no skin in game and have more to gain by moral grandstanding and virtue signaling with their other white guilt ridden emotional dumb shits than they do by thinking critically and rationally.
    They also like cheap nannies and yard care.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,105 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2020

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    There’s a documentary coming out on Thomas that sounds pretty interesting. Born into abject poverty. Family didn’t even speak English (Gullah). Quite literally the American Dream. He’s written something like four times as many opinions as any other current justice.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,105 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?