Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Here’s What The Lead Roger Stone Juror Said During Jury Selection
DJDuck
Member Posts: 5,970
“A former Democratic congressional candidate revealed Wednesday that she was the foreperson on the jury that convicted Roger Stone.
Tomeka Hart said during the jury selection process that she did not “pay that close attention” to developments in the Russia investigation.
She also said that Stone’s links to President Donald Trump would “absolutely not” affect her views at trial.
But Hart’s social media posts show that she was closely tuned in to the Russia probe and that she considered Trump and his supporters to be racist.
https://dailycaller.com/2020/02/13/roger-stone-jury-selection/
Tomeka Hart said during the jury selection process that she did not “pay that close attention” to developments in the Russia investigation.
She also said that Stone’s links to President Donald Trump would “absolutely not” affect her views at trial.
But Hart’s social media posts show that she was closely tuned in to the Russia probe and that she considered Trump and his supporters to be racist.
https://dailycaller.com/2020/02/13/roger-stone-jury-selection/
Comments
-
Fox's Napolitano: Roger Stone 'absolutely entitled' to new trial after juror's tweets revealed
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/482932-foxs-napolitano-roger-stone-absolutely-entitled-to-new-trial-after-jurors -
She is just another example of a low life lying rat. She should be prosecuted for lying in court. The left will praise her because that is what liars do. They FEEL justified in lying.
Notice one of the bitch's posts about Republicans being racist. She does the stupid rat thing and just proclaims everyone that disagrees with her is racist. I can guarantee you that if I asked her for one example of racist behavior by Trump, she could not give me one example. The rats on here are the exact same way. It just makes them FEEL GOOD to claim others are racist because they know deep down it is they who are what they claim others are.
-
It's pretty clear this woman had bias vs. Trump and had no business sitting on a jury in a trial related to ANYTHING related to mean orange man.
This bitch needs brought up on perjury charges.
“Is there anything about that that affects your ability to judge him fairly and impartially sitting here right now in this courtroom?” Jackson queried.
“Absolutely not,” Hart answered. -
And? Even if what you guys are saying is true. How does that make stone less guilty?
-
Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
-
Leftists hate the concept of a presumption of innocence.WestlinnDuck said:Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
Basic civics.
-
How are any of Stone's - ahem "crimes" - related to Trump or the campaign?
How did any of his - ahem "crimes" - require a predawn raid of his home? with teevee cameras?
All this shows is what happens when "injustice" rules the day. When Democrats hold the reins of power.
Now more than ever. #MAGA -
All of the was under Trump's DOJ. HTHpawz said:How are any of Stone's - ahem "crimes" - related to Trump or the campaign?
How did any of his - ahem "crimes" - require a predawn raid of his home? with teevee cameras?
All this shows is what happens when "injustice" rules the day. When Democrats hold the reins of power.
Now more than ever. #MAGA -
Stone is the underbelly of lowlife political activity. He's definitely a scumbag in my book. Not an OKG.pawz said:How are any of Stone's - ahem "crimes" - related to Trump or the campaign?
How did any of his - ahem "crimes" - require a predawn raid of his home? with teevee cameras?
All this shows is what happens when "injustice" rules the day. When Democrats hold the reins of power.
Now more than ever. #MAGA
But that doesn't mean he is any less deserving of a fair trial with a presumption of innocence and an unbiased jury of his peers. If the prosecutors were so confident of their case with the deep resources of the US government behind them, THEY should have been the ones pointing out this jurors bias.
It's like the team with the most talent stealing signs during the World Series or something.....
-
Fruit of the poison tree is basic.
As is equal application of the law
This is a preview of these pieces of shit getting power
-
Trump just needed more tim to get his own acquittal in there.RaceBannon said:Fruit of the poison tree is basic.
As is equal application of the law
This is a preview of these pieces of shit getting power
Some of these fucks in the DOJ would be smart to take early retirement because they're fucking next.
-
If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
-
Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hackHHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
-
It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.RaceBannon said:
Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hackHHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
-
The juror is the least of the problems with the fascist prosecution. The Obama prosecutors trying to save Mueller's mangy ass and the coordination with CNN on a dawn raid and an Obama judge that is as impartial as you are.HHusky said:
It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.RaceBannon said:
Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hackHHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
At least we found the one man in America that the left thinks belongs in prison for a long time -
So you’d prefer to make a different argument now. Good choice!RaceBannon said:
The juror is the least of the problems with the fascist prosecution. The Obama prosecutors trying to save Mueller's mangy ass and the coordination with CNN on a dawn raid and an Obama judge that is as impartial as you are.HHusky said:
It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.RaceBannon said:
Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hackHHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
At least we found the one man in America that the left thinks belongs in prison for a long time -
Well, given your legal expertise, dazzler, that means absolutely jack shit.HHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
-
Its all the same argument, hack. I have you down in favor of malicious prosecution of political enemies based on a lie and illegal taps. Poison fruit is welcomeHHusky said:
So you’d prefer to make a different argument now. Good choice!RaceBannon said:
The juror is the least of the problems with the fascist prosecution. The Obama prosecutors trying to save Mueller's mangy ass and the coordination with CNN on a dawn raid and an Obama judge that is as impartial as you are.HHusky said:
It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.RaceBannon said:
Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hackHHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
At least we found the one man in America that the left thinks belongs in prison for a long time -
Her politics were known. Her social media presence was not anonymous. And there is no evidence that she and her 11 fellow members of a unanimous jury failed to look at the evidence impartially.PurpleThrobber said:
Well, given your legal expertise, dazzler, that means absolutely jack shit.HHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
But she has political opinions. Good luck on that new trial motion. -
Yeah, and the MAGA hat wearing kid doesn’t have a chance to win his case and the fact that the city of Ferguson settled with the Gentle Giant’s family proves that he really was shot in the back while running away.HHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
Fuck off O’Keefed. -
Trump’s DOJ prosecuted the case. It was in the papers.RaceBannon said:
Its all the same argument, hack. I have you down in favor of malicious prosecution of political enemies based on a lie and illegal taps. Poison fruit is welcomeHHusky said:
So you’d prefer to make a different argument now. Good choice!RaceBannon said:
The juror is the least of the problems with the fascist prosecution. The Obama prosecutors trying to save Mueller's mangy ass and the coordination with CNN on a dawn raid and an Obama judge that is as impartial as you are.HHusky said:
It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.RaceBannon said:
Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hackHHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
At least we found the one man in America that the left thinks belongs in prison for a long time -
And the judge picked the juryHHusky said:
Her politics were known. Her social media presence was not anonymous. And there is no evidence that she and her 11 fellow members of a unanimous jury failed to look at the evidence impartially.PurpleThrobber said:
Well, given your legal expertise, dazzler, that means absolutely jack shit.HHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
But she has political opinions. Good luck on that new trial motion.
What is your point other than running cover for a police state?
She was the foreman and she was rabidly partisan and when that came out has no bearing. The judge is also a rabid partisan.
The Flynn case is already falling apart. This is soon to follow. The entire Mueller investigation was a sham and a mockery and this is the last hope for a veneer of respectability
And you're a lawyer. Gaia help us
9 years for what? -
The judge picked the jury?RaceBannon said:
And the judge picked the juryHHusky said:
Her politics were known. Her social media presence was not anonymous. And there is no evidence that she and her 11 fellow members of a unanimous jury failed to look at the evidence impartially.PurpleThrobber said:
Well, given your legal expertise, dazzler, that means absolutely jack shit.HHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
But she has political opinions. Good luck on that new trial motion.
What is your point other than running cover for a police state?
She was the foreman and she was rabidly partisan and when that came out has no bearing. The judge is also a rabid partisan.
The Flynn case is already falling apart. This is soon to follow. The entire Mueller investigation was a sham and a mockery and this is the last hope for a veneer of respectability
And you're a lawyer. Gaia help us
9 years for what?
I’m just a lawyer, but that would be pretty newsworthy. You should contact the press. -
Voir dire. You guys are pathetic.
-
Dugdawg said:
Voir dire. You guys are pathetic.
It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors to tell the truth (Latin: verum dicere), i.e., to say what is true, what is objectively accurate or subjectively honest, or both.
Yeah...crazy telling the truth during voir dire.
-
What did she lie about?PurpleThrobber said:Dugdawg said:Voir dire. You guys are pathetic.
It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors to tell the truth (Latin: verum dicere), i.e., to say what is true, what is objectively accurate or subjectively honest, or both.
Yeah...crazy telling the truth during voir dire. -
Why should I answer your question? You've refused to answer mine for three months.HHusky said:
What did she lie about?PurpleThrobber said:Dugdawg said:Voir dire. You guys are pathetic.
It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors to tell the truth (Latin: verum dicere), i.e., to say what is true, what is objectively accurate or subjectively honest, or both.
Yeah...crazy telling the truth during voir dire.
So as the great philosopher Michael Damone once said
FUCK OFF!
-
So she lied, but you can’t say what her lie was.PurpleThrobber said:
Why should I answer your question? You've refused to answer mine for three months.HHusky said:
What did she lie about?PurpleThrobber said:Dugdawg said:Voir dire. You guys are pathetic.
It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors to tell the truth (Latin: verum dicere), i.e., to say what is true, what is objectively accurate or subjectively honest, or both.
Yeah...crazy telling the truth during voir dire.
So as the great philosopher Michael Damone once said
FUCK OFF! -
What part of FUCK OFF was so difficult to understand?HHusky said:
So she lied, but you can’t say what her lie was.PurpleThrobber said:
Why should I answer your question? You've refused to answer mine for three months.HHusky said:
What did she lie about?PurpleThrobber said:Dugdawg said:Voir dire. You guys are pathetic.
It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors to tell the truth (Latin: verum dicere), i.e., to say what is true, what is objectively accurate or subjectively honest, or both.
Yeah...crazy telling the truth during voir dire.
So as the great philosopher Michael Damone once said
FUCK OFF!
-
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/482932-foxs-napolitano-roger-stone-absolutely-entitled-to-new-trial-after-jurors
Nip or Nap is the guy that said the counsel submitted questions but the judge made the call
Regardless we know the foreman was biased beyond any reasonable standard
Jack bootlicker
