Oh Canada!

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

Girl dead because of socialized medicine. Fuck that Shit and the commies that want it.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3435131/Friends-girl-18-leukemia-sign-casket-loving-messages-final-goodbye-died-waiting-hospital-bed-shortage-Canada.html

Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.

They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.

I don't think you read your own article.

But you'll fit in well with the "healthcare is a right" crowd.

Hope they don't go to a lottery. The treatment you're talking about has a high mortality rate, which gets worse when you've already been treated and the disease has returned. Probably best to take those who have the best chance of surviving the treatment first.

You didn't read it. "Resources" and "means" not relapse were the reason she wasn't treated.

I see you were unable to find me an American with a donor ready to go who dead because we didn't have the means or resources. The government doesn't tell the hospital/doctors how many procedures they can do per year.

This isn't a wheel them in and out thing. They didn't have enough beds to provide immediate service. That's not surprising since the treatment lasts months.

And I didn't say your article mentioned the relapse as a reason she didn't get treated. I simply provided you some facts you probably didn't know. The fact she had been treated before would have been a legitimate medical reason to prefer a candidate who hadn't been treated before. I don't know whether that was also a consideration. It should have been.

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

Girl dead because of socialized medicine. Fuck that Shit and the commies that want it.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3435131/Friends-girl-18-leukemia-sign-casket-loving-messages-final-goodbye-died-waiting-hospital-bed-shortage-Canada.html

Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.

They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.

I don't think you read your own article.

But you'll fit in well with the "healthcare is a right" crowd.

Hope they don't go to a lottery. The treatment you're talking about has a high mortality rate, which gets worse when you've already been treated and the disease has returned. Probably best to take those who have the best chance of surviving the treatment first.

You didn't read it. "Resources" and "means" not relapse were the reason she wasn't treated.

I see you were unable to find me an American with a donor ready to go who dead because we didn't have the means or resources. The government doesn't tell the hospital/doctors how many procedures they can do per year.

This isn't a wheel them in and out thing. They didn't have enough beds to provide immediate service. That's not surprising since the treatment lasts months.

And I didn't say your article mentioned the relapse as a reason she didn't get treated. I simply provided you some facts you probably didn't know. The fact she had been treated before would have been a legitimate medical reason to prefer a candidate who hadn't been treated before. I don't know whether that was also a consideration. It should have been.

You don't know socialized medicine has actual limits on things like number of procedures.

That's why you can't find a comfortable situation here in the free world.

If your reasons were correct we'd see it here.

We're really lucky that insurance and hospital executives make the decisions about us then.

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

Girl dead because of socialized medicine. Fuck that Shit and the commies that want it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3435131/Friends-girl-18-leukemia-sign-casket-loving-messages-final-goodbye-died-waiting-hospital-bed-shortage-Canada.html

Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.

Go ahead and rationalize it, loser. YBFE.

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

Girl dead because of socialized medicine. Fuck that Shit and the commies that want it.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3435131/Friends-girl-18-leukemia-sign-casket-loving-messages-final-goodbye-died-waiting-hospital-bed-shortage-Canada.html

Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.

They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.

I don't think you read your own article.

But you'll fit in well with the "healthcare is a right" crowd.

Hope they don't go to a lottery. The treatment you're talking about has a high mortality rate, which gets worse when you've already been treated and the disease has returned. Probably best to take those who have the best chance of surviving the treatment first.

You didn't read it. "Resources" and "means" not relapse were the reason she wasn't treated.

I see you were unable to find me an American with a donor ready to go who dead because we didn't have the means or resources. The government doesn't tell the hospital/doctors how many procedures they can do per year.

This isn't a wheel them in and out thing. They didn't have enough beds to provide immediate service. That's not surprising since the treatment lasts months.

And I didn't say your article mentioned the relapse as a reason she didn't get treated. I simply provided you some facts you probably didn't know. The fact she had been treated before would have been a legitimate medical reason to prefer a candidate who hadn't been treated before. I don't know whether that was also a consideration. It should have been.

You don't know socialized medicine has actual limits on things like number of procedures.

That's why you can't find a comfortable situation here in the free world.

If your reasons were correct we'd see it here.

We're really lucky that insurance and hospital executives make the decisions about us then.

You got the cash services are available. I know that's unbearable for socialists.

This treatment’s costs range from the low to the mid six figures, so I guess the kid whose parents have that cash are all set.

So then that's better off than where no one gets it except I guess the oligarchs and elites in government.

Allow the free market to incentivize cost savings and innovation and it might even be as easy to acquire as a cell phone.

The very existence of the treatment reflects the fact that innovation isn’t being stifled. But a course of intense and risky treatment that can run three months or more isn’t likely to ever become cheap or easy to acquire.