Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This Bolton shit

1235712

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,441

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Why is Biden above the law?

    You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
    Biden confessed

    It relates directly to the Ukraine

    And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government

    No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime

    There is no evidence aid was tied to anything

    The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.

    Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.

    They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
    I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
    What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?

    Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
    Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.

    But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
    Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
    That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.

    In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
    I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
    Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.

    Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
    But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
    Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?
    Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?
    Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.
    America has concluded there is no there there with Trump

    More than once

    Doesn't stop endless investigation of a political opponent by the Democrats

    Announced and everything

    You guys can't even track your own bullshit
    You should probably just stick with “We’ve got the votes.” You know there’s no direct evidence that helps Daddy. That’s why some of you are imploring your team to endorse Daddy’s obstruction of this “trial”.
    There's no direct evidence against Trump you blithering idiot

    The house has no case. That's your problem
    And the emperor’s clothes? How do you like them?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that.

    Who here has said there's no issues with Biden, Burisms, etc. Investigate that shit all you want. Put Biden in jail if he did what you contend. But that has nothing to do with whether Trump committed treason or high crime and misdemeanor.

    Laughing at the rest of your comment talking about "smart people".
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,710 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Why is Biden above the law?

    You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
    Biden confessed

    It relates directly to the Ukraine

    And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government

    No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime

    There is no evidence aid was tied to anything

    The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.

    Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.

    They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
    I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
    And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,441
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Why is Biden above the law?

    You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
    Biden confessed

    It relates directly to the Ukraine

    And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government

    No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime

    There is no evidence aid was tied to anything

    The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.

    Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.

    They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
    I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
    And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
    An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Why is Biden above the law?

    You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
    Biden confessed

    It relates directly to the Ukraine

    And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government

    No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime

    There is no evidence aid was tied to anything

    The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.

    Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.

    They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
    I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
    And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
    An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.
    Said the Kunt who was all over the claim the Trump collided with the Russians to steal the election.

    Hypocrisy and lies are all you have O’Keefed.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,710 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Why is Biden above the law?

    You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
    Biden confessed

    It relates directly to the Ukraine

    And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government

    No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime

    There is no evidence aid was tied to anything

    The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.

    Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.

    They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
    I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
    And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
    An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.
    Every bit as good as an anonymous source causing Bolton said something.

    Double standard much?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,441
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Why is Biden above the law?

    You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
    Biden confessed

    It relates directly to the Ukraine

    And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government

    No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime

    There is no evidence aid was tied to anything

    The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.

    Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.

    They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
    I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
    And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
    An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.
    Said the Kunt who was all over the claim the Trump collided with the Russians to steal the election.

    Hypocrisy and lies are all you have O’Keefed.
    I’ve always credited Daddy as shitty at collusion. But he tried.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,441
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Why is Biden above the law?

    You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
    Biden confessed

    It relates directly to the Ukraine

    And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government

    No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime

    There is no evidence aid was tied to anything

    The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.

    Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.

    They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
    I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
    And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
    An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.
    Every bit as good as an anonymous source causing Bolton said something.

    Double standard much?
    I don’t believe Fiona Hill is anonymous. You’re not good at this.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,710 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Why is Biden above the law?

    You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
    Biden confessed

    It relates directly to the Ukraine

    And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government

    No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime

    There is no evidence aid was tied to anything

    The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.

    Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.

    They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
    I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
    And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
    An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.
    Said the Kunt who was all over the claim the Trump collided with the Russians to steal the election.

    Hypocrisy and lies are all you have O’Keefed.
    I’ve always credited Daddy as shitty at collusion. But he tried.
    2.5 years and bupkis. Needed 3?
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Why is Biden above the law?

    You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
    Biden confessed

    It relates directly to the Ukraine

    And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government

    No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime

    There is no evidence aid was tied to anything

    The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.

    Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.

    They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
    I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
    What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?

    Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
    Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.

    But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
    Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
    That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.

    In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
    I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
    Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.

    Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
    But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation.
    Your OUTRAGE is as phony as you are O'Keefed.


    And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
    Some of us are old enough to remember when Blob conceded that Trump should be impeached if he tied the aide to investigations. To be fair we all knew even then he would eventually “evolve”.