Husky Jacks open thread [2020]
Comments
-
Good pointsMad_Son said:
Upsets happen. If the score differential is within 1-3 points the better team wins 60% of the time. 4-7 it gets to the better team 65% of the time.RoadDawg55 said:
Both teams too high. PFF likes us a lot better than anyone else. Metric type stuff puts so much emphasis on close losses and blowout wins.GrundleStiltzkin said:For my PFF Guys™
The reason why that makes some people here so jaded is our systematic close losses. The mental aspect of that isn't really captured well by "the metrics". It is somewhat fair that we're rated highly because we have the horses to win and we've shown we can play with good teams. We just had the zit factor with Pete where we didn't get the W's.
The algorithm that captures mental toughness first will win.
But Michael Wilbon and I will still yell at the clouds -
You have black friends?RaceBannon said:
Good pointsMad_Son said:
Upsets happen. If the score differential is within 1-3 points the better team wins 60% of the time. 4-7 it gets to the better team 65% of the time.RoadDawg55 said:
Both teams too high. PFF likes us a lot better than anyone else. Metric type stuff puts so much emphasis on close losses and blowout wins.GrundleStiltzkin said:For my PFF Guys™
The reason why that makes some people here so jaded is our systematic close losses. The mental aspect of that isn't really captured well by "the metrics". It is somewhat fair that we're rated highly because we have the horses to win and we've shown we can play with good teams. We just had the zit factor with Pete where we didn't get the W's.
The algorithm that captures mental toughness first will win.
But Michael Wilbon and I will still yell at the clouds -
-
I still remember some arguing that Arkansas at 7-6 was actually better than a 13-1 Florida State. A team with much less talent and 6 losses is better than a team with one loss because they played some SEC teams tuff. It was so fucking stupid.
-
You mean the 2014 Florida State team that won seven games by six points or less in a weak ACC and proceeded to get blown out by Oregon in the playoffs by 39? That Florida State team?RoadDawg55 said:I still remember some arguing that Arkansas at 7-6 was actually better than a 13-1 Florida State. A team with much less talent and 6 losses is better than a team with one loss because they played some SEC teams tuff. It was so fucking stupid.
Seems like if you were going to cherry pick one example out of the history of college football to prove the metrics wrong you could have come up with something a little better. -
Okay sure. I’ll do that for you next time.FremontTroll said:
You mean the 2014 Florida State team that won seven games by six points or less in a weak ACC and proceeded to get blown out by Oregon in the playoffs by 39? That Florida State team?RoadDawg55 said:I still remember some arguing that Arkansas at 7-6 was actually better than a 13-1 Florida State. A team with much less talent and 6 losses is better than a team with one loss because they played some SEC teams tuff. It was so fucking stupid.
Seems like if you were going to cherry pick one example out of the history of college football to prove the metrics wrong you could have come up with something a little better. -
I never could figure out Brent Bulimia at Arky. He was very good at Wisconsin but it turns out everyone is very good there but he built this big ass HOG line at Arky and they were all Airport but 7-6.
The SEC West is no place for less than great -
No QB and he didn’t have the talent to beat Bama, LSU, Auburn, etc. It really is a tough place to win. A really good coach would and they have before, but you need to be elite and evaluating, recruiting, and developing to have a shot there. The new coach will be fired in three years too.RaceBannon said:I never could figure out Brent Bulimia at Arky. He was very good at Wisconsin but it turns out everyone is very good there but he built this big ass HOG line at Arky and they were all Airport but 7-6.
The SEC West is no place for less than great -
-
Still in contention for the off season natty
https://youtu.be/FByIvtfTe4U
@18mileperhourtreadmill is a thing of the past it looks like. -
So apparently it is pretty shallow class this year at center so he might go before the 4th round. Wow, eating my words @dnc did not think he would go this highGrundleStiltzkin said: -
Glad we offered him a chance to be a PWO to get Wattenburger on boardFireCohen said:
So apparently it is pretty shallow class this year at center so he might go before the 4th round. Wow, eating my words @dnc did not think he would go this highGrundleStiltzkin said: -
Great point. We got rewarded by the metrics for close losses to good teams (Oregon, Utah). And we barely got dinged for close losses to Cal and Colorado. We got dominated by Stanford and really should have lost by more. Not sure my point, but last season fucking sucked and the team this upcoming year sucks until it doesn’t.Mad_Son said:
Upsets happen. If the score differential is within 1-3 points the better team wins 60% of the time. 4-7 it gets to the better team 65% of the time.RoadDawg55 said:
Both teams too high. PFF likes us a lot better than anyone else. Metric type stuff puts so much emphasis on close losses and blowout wins.GrundleStiltzkin said:For my PFF Guys™
The reason why that makes some people here so jaded is our systematic close losses. The mental aspect of that isn't really captured well by "the metrics". It is somewhat fair that we're rated highly because we have the horses to win and we've shown we can play with good teams. We just had the zit factor with Pete where we didn't get the W's.
The algorithm that captures mental toughness first will win. -
lol wtf is this picture?Neighbor2972 said:
-
-
Somehow this spun off into a thread with me, dennis, coker, chest, CFB quotes, some quook, and Softy. Its been OP and the quook going back and forth for 7-8 tweets with not a single other person acknowledging the thread except for one tweet where I asked why the fuck softy was on it. Big twitter day.
-
Poast some highlightsWilburHooksHands said:Somehow this spun off into a thread with me, dennis, coker, chest, CFB quotes, some quook, and Softy. Its been OP and the quook going back and forth for 7-8 tweets with not a single other person acknowledging the thread except for one tweet where I asked why the fuck softy was on it. Big twitter day.
-
GrundleStiltzkin said:
Poast some highlightsWilburHooksHands said:Somehow this spun off into a thread with me, dennis, coker, chest, CFB quotes, some quook, and Softy. Its been OP and the quook going back and forth for 7-8 tweets with not a single other person acknowledging the thread except for one tweet where I asked why the fuck softy was on it. Big twitter day.
-
Using Twitter should hurt.
-
What is this faggotry
-
Both fan bases deserve owen12
-
-
the crime rate natty is now playing out
-
-
-
It's unusual faggotry.dooginthehall said:What is this faggotry
-
Different different.digits said:
It's unusual faggotry.dooginthehall said:What is this faggotry
-
WilburHooksHands said:GrundleStiltzkin said:
Poast some highlightsWilburHooksHands said:Somehow this spun off into a thread with me, dennis, coker, chest, CFB quotes, some quook, and Softy. Its been OP and the quook going back and forth for 7-8 tweets with not a single other person acknowledging the thread except for one tweet where I asked why the fuck softy was on it. Big twitter day.
-
