Watch this and you will understand
espn.go.com/30for30/film?page=requiemforthebigeast
Comments
-
You can win with the right coach. Butler made back to back NCAA finals. Not like they were ever a power previously.
Can UW be a power? Define power.
If George Mason, Butler, VCU and Witchita State can make a final four then UW certainly is capable. -
Slow day?
-
You didn't watch the show.He_Needs_More_Time said:You can win with the right coach. Butler made back to back NCAA finals. Not like they were ever a power previously.
Can UW be a power? Define power.
If George Mason, Butler, VCU and Witchita State can make a final four then UW certainly is capable. -
So?doogsinparadise said:Slow day?
-
I watched it when it first premiered. I miss that college basketball where guys like Ewing would play all four years. I don't get where you are going with this.MikeDamone said:
You didn't watch the show.He_Needs_More_Time said:You can win with the right coach. Butler made back to back NCAA finals. Not like they were ever a power previously.
Can UW be a power? Define power.
If George Mason, Butler, VCU and Witchita State can make a final four then UW certainly is capable.
The Big East had a bunch of schools that were independent but not basketball powerhouses. Then in the 80's they became powerhouses.
The conference was kicking ass then in the 90's when T.V. deals started to dominate college sports therefore football became even more attractive. The Big East fell apart.
I really don't see how the Big East going from a nothing, to the best conference in America to suddenly dissolving all in a 30 year span has anything to do with UW basketball. -
This may be unpopular, but it's not in the interests of the corporate side of collegiate sports for schools like Washington to be good; simply not strong enough as a national brand. You can hire a good coach and be in the sweet sixteen for a few years, but to sustain long term success is another animal.He_Needs_More_Time said:You can win with the right coach. Butler made back to back NCAA finals. Not like they were ever a power previously.
Can UW be a power? Define power.
If George Mason, Butler, VCU and Witchita State can make a final four then UW certainly is capable. -
Im talking long term ucla, arizona, unc, kansas type of success, not Butler or Creighton
-
I don't get why it would hurt the corporate side at all. It's not like if UW is good it means Duke, UNC, and Kentucky are going to suck. It wasn't in the interest of Arizona to be a power back in the 80's either.doogsinparadise said:
This may be unpopular, but it's not in the interests of the corporate side of collegiate sports for schools like Washington to be good; simply not strong enough as a national brand. You can hire a good coach and be in the sweet sixteen for a few years, but to sustain long term success is another animal.He_Needs_More_Time said:You can win with the right coach. Butler made back to back NCAA finals. Not like they were ever a power previously.
Can UW be a power? Define power.
If George Mason, Butler, VCU and Witchita State can make a final four then UW certainly is capable.
-
It's why I asked Damone to define power. I didn't say UW can be the next Duke or even UCONN/Arizona(Both nothing before Olson/Calhoun).doogsinparadise said:
This may be unpopular, but it's not in the interests of the corporate side of collegiate sports for schools like Washington to be good; simply not strong enough as a national brand. You can hire a good coach and be in the sweet sixteen for a few years, but to sustain long term success is another animal.He_Needs_More_Time said:You can win with the right coach. Butler made back to back NCAA finals. Not like they were ever a power previously.
Can UW be a power? Define power.
If George Mason, Butler, VCU and Witchita State can make a final four then UW certainly is capable.
But if the small schools I mentioned before can make the final four why can't UW? That's my point. -
I was referring to the more lasting power definition, as that seems to be the standard around here for the football team.
Basketball doesn't have the sort of tradition where people around the country would talk about the team if they started winning. That's what football has, and what the media means when they called it a "sleeping giant" under the previous regime.
