Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Eason out

13»

Comments

  • whuggy
    whuggy Member Posts: 2,088
    Pitchfork51 said:

    whuggy said:

    MikeDamone said:

    whuggy said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    whuggy said:

    jhfstyle24 said:

    In my doog heart I don't think this was the best decision for him. He will be 4th or 5th QB but he wouldn't have gone over Lawrence next year so who knows if it makes a difference.

    Whatever. Expectation should still be to win the PAC. Get it done

    Would probably go higher next year but now gets to go to a decent team. NFL players make their serious money second contract anyway. The high draft position is pretty overated.
    Why do you think he goes to a decent team? Good teams mostly aren’t interested in picking QB’s high. Bad ones trade up and down all the time in the draft.

    The good and bad teams change yearly in the NFL after the Pats and Seahawks that the majority of the situations are similar.
    He'll go to a decent team lower in the first round that doesn't particularly need him right away.
    Or ever. Most teams like QBs who can read defenses and don’t throw pick sixes.
    He can learn to read.
    Bull fucking shit.
    Didn't realize you're getting paid to coach for a living. My mistake. Which team you work for again?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    edited December 2019
    Doogles said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Yeah Chandler started in a Super Bowl. But he was our QB as the first James dynasty crumbled

    He was a 7 and 5 type guy. We couldn't wait for Millen to leave. Chandler threw a pretty ball

    Brunell probably started more games than any of them

    Brunell is easily the most successful of the bunch after Moon. Chandler was a better passer. So was Pelluer.

    Hobert could have been the best of them all if he hadn't been so fucking stupid.
    Damon Huard had a late career resurgence and probably is number 3.

    In keeping with the proud UW QB tradition, he won two super bowls holding a clipboard and was an integral part of the Patriots preparation for Peyton Manning in the AFC championship game.

    That's pretty much all we got.
    Nah Huard isn’t above Chandler.

    Husky NFL QB rankings:

    1. Moon
    2. Brunell
    3. Chandler
    4 is debatable, there’s not really anyone of any significance. Damon’s two rings get him the nod, I guess.

    After that you get a plethora of non descriptive clipboard holders as noted with a couple draft busts thrown in there: Locker, Hobert, Tui, Brock, Conklin (another keyboard ring), Millen, Pelluer. Add a couple position switch @BleachedAnusDawg picks like Bjornsen (surprisingly decent career) and Stanback and that is basically the list.

    How did Sixkiller never get a shot? Swayecism?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,673 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Yeah Chandler started in a Super Bowl. But he was our QB as the first James dynasty crumbled

    He was a 7 and 5 type guy. We couldn't wait for Millen to leave. Chandler threw a pretty ball

    Brunell probably started more games than any of them

    Brunell is easily the most successful of the bunch after Moon. Chandler was a better passer. So was Pelluer.

    Hobert could have been the best of them all if he hadn't been so fucking stupid.
    Damon Huard had a late career resurgence and probably is number 3.

    In keeping with the proud UW QB tradition, he won two super bowls holding a clipboard and was an integral part of the Patriots preparation for Peyton Manning in the AFC championship game.

    That's pretty much all we got.
    Nah Huard isn’t above Chandler.

    Husky NFL QB rankings:

    1. Moon
    2. Brunell
    3. Chandler
    4 is debatable, there’s not really anyone of any significance. Damon’s two rings get him the nod, I guess.

    After that you get a plethora of non descriptive clipboard holders as noted with a couple draft busts thrown in there: Locker, Hobert, Tui, Brock, Conklin (another keyboard ring), Millen, Pelluer. Add a couple position switch @BleachedAnusDawg picks like Bjornsen (surprisingly decent career) and Stanback and that is basically the list.

    How did Sixkiller never get a shot? Swayecism?
    In1972 an under 6 foot qb had no shot with the NFL

    Fouts however went on to the HOF from the same class
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,661
    whuggy said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    whuggy said:

    MikeDamone said:

    whuggy said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    whuggy said:

    jhfstyle24 said:

    In my doog heart I don't think this was the best decision for him. He will be 4th or 5th QB but he wouldn't have gone over Lawrence next year so who knows if it makes a difference.

    Whatever. Expectation should still be to win the PAC. Get it done

    Would probably go higher next year but now gets to go to a decent team. NFL players make their serious money second contract anyway. The high draft position is pretty overated.
    Why do you think he goes to a decent team? Good teams mostly aren’t interested in picking QB’s high. Bad ones trade up and down all the time in the draft.

    The good and bad teams change yearly in the NFL after the Pats and Seahawks that the majority of the situations are similar.
    He'll go to a decent team lower in the first round that doesn't particularly need him right away.
    Or ever. Most teams like QBs who can read defenses and don’t throw pick sixes.
    He can learn to read.
    Bull fucking shit.
    Didn't realize you're getting paid to coach for a living. My mistake. Which team you work for again?
    Your moms
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Mad_Son said:

    Postal91 said:

    And it just hit me.... we will be giving a QB their 1st start in our 1st game against Michigan next year. FFFFFFFFFFFFFuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhk.

    If Sirmon starts he will be playing in his 6th career game... getting his 4th career pass attempt.

    That’s better than zero
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    ThomasFremont said:

    Imagine caring about NFL success for former players. I’ll root for them, but if we’re being honest, no amount of Super Bowl rings or Pro Bowls impact their career as a Husky.


    Thomas gets it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • azumah
    azumah Member Posts: 21
    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Yeah Chandler started in a Super Bowl. But he was our QB as the first James dynasty crumbled

    He was a 7 and 5 type guy. We couldn't wait for Millen to leave. Chandler threw a pretty ball

    Brunell probably started more games than any of them

    Brunell is easily the most successful of the bunch after Moon. Chandler was a better passer. So was Pelluer.

    Hobert could have been the best of them all if he hadn't been so fucking stupid.
    Damon Huard had a late career resurgence and probably is number 3.

    In keeping with the proud UW QB tradition, he won two super bowls holding a clipboard and was an integral part of the Patriots preparation for Peyton Manning in the AFC championship game.

    That's pretty much all we got.
    Nah Huard isn’t above Chandler.

    Husky NFL QB rankings:

    1. Moon
    2. Brunell
    3. Chandler
    4 is debatable, there’s not really anyone of any significance. Damon’s two rings get him the nod, I guess.

    After that you get a plethora of non descriptive clipboard holders as noted with a couple draft busts thrown in there: Locker, Hobert, Tui, Brock, Conklin (another keyboard ring), Millen, Pelluer. Add a couple position switch @BleachedAnusDawg picks like Bjornsen (surprisingly decent career) and Stanback and that is basically the list.

    How did Sixkiller never get a shot? Swayecism?
    Why do people always leave out Tom Flick?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club
    Postal91 said:

    And it just hit me.... we will be giving a QB their 1st start in our 1st game against Michigan next year. FFFFFFFFFFFFFuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhk.

    We better be out recruiting a 5th year grad transfer QB ASAP
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BeerThirty
    BeerThirty Member Posts: 2,465
    So disappointing
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    If u didnt c it, c it. And to Easons Dad...pound that up your ass. Im sure you witnessed it on tv so prolly not as painful. Btw, my buddy fucked your wife and came in her ass. Waiting for a perfect opportunity to tell you. Go Bulldawgs
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,198 Founders Club
    RoadDawg55 said:

    whuggy said:

    jhfstyle24 said:

    In my doog heart I don't think this was the best decision for him. He will be 4th or 5th QB but he wouldn't have gone over Lawrence next year so who knows if it makes a difference.

    Whatever. Expectation should still be to win the PAC. Get it done

    Would probably go higher next year but now gets to go to a decent team. NFL players make their serious money second contract anyway. The high draft position is pretty overated.
    Why do you think he goes to a decent team? Good teams mostly aren’t interested in picking QB’s high. Bad ones trade up and down all the time in the draft.

    The good and bad teams change yearly in the NFL after the Pats and Seahawks that the majority of the situations are similar.
    Bucky Brooks thinks the Chargers would be very interested in Skinny
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,141 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    If u didnt c it, c it. And to Easons Dad...pound that up your ass. Im sure you witnessed it on tv so prolly not as painful. Btw, my buddy fucked your wife and came in her ass. Waiting for a perfect opportunity to tell you. Go Bulldawgs

    Where for art thou, Pumpeii?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CaptainPJ
    CaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986
    RaceBannon said:

    CaptainPJ said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    Imagine caring about NFL success for former players. I’ll root for them, but if we’re being honest, no amount of Super Bowl rings or Pro Bowls impact their career as a Husky.

    Tell the Cuog that - you would think Minshew was still in College
    Rypien won a super bowl!!!!!!!

    Bledsoe got replaced by Brady!!!!!!!
    UVA!!
    Golden State!!l

    3 more Championships for the Cuog!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    RaceBannon said:

    Theironshiek said:

    Lotta UGA people saying it’s another one of theirs off to the NFL.

    Eason would be fortunate to put up Stafford's empty numbers to rep Georgia in the NFL

    Probably his comp
    I could see him getting good enough to have a couple good seasons and win a couple playoff games. He’s never going to be consistently great. Stafford, Flacco, Josh Allen, Cutler. He will be like those guys or worse.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    whuggy said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    whuggy said:

    jhfstyle24 said:

    In my doog heart I don't think this was the best decision for him. He will be 4th or 5th QB but he wouldn't have gone over Lawrence next year so who knows if it makes a difference.

    Whatever. Expectation should still be to win the PAC. Get it done

    Would probably go higher next year but now gets to go to a decent team. NFL players make their serious money second contract anyway. The high draft position is pretty overated.
    Why do you think he goes to a decent team? Good teams mostly aren’t interested in picking QB’s high. Bad ones trade up and down all the time in the draft.

    The good and bad teams change yearly in the NFL after the Pats and Seahawks that the majority of the situations are similar.
    He'll go to a decent team lower in the first round that doesn't particularly need him right away.
    As someone said, this is lazy thinking. Trades, he goes 2nd round, etc. He’s still more likely to go to an average or bad team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited December 2019
    ThomasFremont said:

    Imagine caring about NFL success for former players. I’ll root for them, but if we’re being honest, no amount of Super Bowl rings or Pro Bowls impact their career as a Husky.

    This. I don’t recognize Littleton as a Husky great and he’s a Pro Bowl caliber LB. He was a decent player that had a good senior season. He went I drafted because he didn’t do all that much at UW.

    I would rank Azeem and BBK as better and neither will probably ever do that much at the pro level. Azeem has almost no chance of that happening.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    RoadDawg55 said:

    creepycoug said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Lasting legacy will be the two chokes vs Oregon and Stanford

    And of course the Super Bowl win vs EWU

    Really thought he would benefit from another year. Oh well, bring on Morris

    He didn't play inside linebacker, so I'm not sure you can lay the second game on him. As Race is fond of poonting out, when team runs down your throat in the 4th quarter for the game - winning drive, it's the football equivalent of letting a guy come and slap his dick on your face.
    I wouldn’t lay any loss on him except probably Utah. You can’t throw pick 6’s, fumble, and throw a pick in the red zone against a good team.

    He wasn’t great tho. Whether it was a result of the shifty offense or him being overrated doesn’t matter. He was ultimately no better than Browning and worse considering Browning won. Browning was also a better leader and demanded more from his teammates. Browning was a GOOD QB.
    Ty vs Sark POTY.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,327
    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Theironshiek said:

    Lotta UGA people saying it’s another one of theirs off to the NFL.

    Eason would be fortunate to put up Stafford's empty numbers to rep Georgia in the NFL

    Probably his comp
    I could see him getting good enough to have a couple good seasons and win a couple playoff games. He’s never going to be consistently great. Stafford, Flacco, Josh Allen, Cutler. He will be like those guys or worse.
    If he is like cutler Stafford or flacco that is a huge success. Those guys all fluctuated from the middle to upper half of QBs in the league during their prime and got massive contracts. He has the talent but a ton to work on (feet, progressions and eye manipulation). What gives him hope is i think he is more Talented throwing the ball than Allen and they were similar In all those other problem areas at this point. For his sake hopefully he goes somewhere to sit and work on that stuff.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    AtomicDawg said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Theironshiek said:

    Lotta UGA people saying it’s another one of theirs off to the NFL.

    Eason would be fortunate to put up Stafford's empty numbers to rep Georgia in the NFL

    Probably his comp
    I could see him getting good enough to have a couple good seasons and win a couple playoff games. He’s never going to be consistently great. Stafford, Flacco, Josh Allen, Cutler. He will be like those guys or worse.
    If he is like cutler Stafford or flacco that is a huge success. Those guys all fluctuated from the middle to upper half of QBs in the league during their prime and got massive contracts. He has the talent but a ton to work on (feet, progressions and eye manipulation). What gives him hope is i think he is more Talented throwing the ball than Allen and they were similar In all those other problem areas at this point. For his sake hopefully he goes somewhere to sit and work on that stuff.
    He can make the throws so if he has a good OC that schemes guys open or WR’s he can trust, he will be decent.

    Where he will always struggle, is against the pass rush and processing things quickly. Most coaches say that can’t be taught, and Eason definitely lacks it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Depends what’s is your definition of success. Playing 10+ plus years in the league is pretty successful
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter