According to doogman.com.....
Comments
-
Kim is a doog and a full-blown retard. Everyone knows that.PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:
Exactly, which brings us back to my point about how doogish it was for Kim to claim 70-21 was Pete's greatest victory in the Washington era.RaceBannon said:
Washington has lost to Oregon 2 of their last three titlesPandaOrangeChiknDuck said:
I’d rather lose to Washington and win the PAC 12 championship than beat Washington and lose the PAC 12 championship. It’s hard!haie said:
qpotdPandaOrangeChiknDuck said:
It really wasn’t. Oregon had the North all but locked up before that game. The Utah game was Oregon’s best win by a long shot, because it was one of the only games this year where Oregon was effective on both sides of the ball.RaceBannon said:Or the Pac 12 sucks and beating Colorado and Utah is nothing to get excited about
Beating Stanford and Oregon to win the north will always matter more
Your best win this year was in Seattle
And you know it
It really was.
We live it -
If you're saying for that season, sure, I'll buy that. But it's by no means the greatest win of the Pete Washington era, which is what Kim is supposedly arguing.RaceBannon said:
After 12 straight losses to follow up a Stanford win with another loss to Oregon would have ruined the magical run to a play off loss. Oregon didn't mail it in until after 70-21. And 70-21 on the road after 12 straight losses? Come on man, fuck Grinolds, that was bigdnc said:The Stanford win a week earlier was the biggest win of the Pete era.
The Oregon win just meant the most to people who would rather beat Oregon than actually have a great team.
The resident quooks are right about this. I'm surprised they're surprised though. Kim Doogolds told us this was the biggest win to his little brain a long time ago.
Had we beat Bama this discussion would be closed. Or maybe USC -
Well that was the greatest seasonPandaOrangeChiknDuck said:
If you're saying for that season, sure, I'll buy that. But it's by no means the greatest win of the Pete Washington era, which is what Kim is supposedly arguing.RaceBannon said:
After 12 straight losses to follow up a Stanford win with another loss to Oregon would have ruined the magical run to a play off loss. Oregon didn't mail it in until after 70-21. And 70-21 on the road after 12 straight losses? Come on man, fuck Grinolds, that was bigdnc said:The Stanford win a week earlier was the biggest win of the Pete era.
The Oregon win just meant the most to people who would rather beat Oregon than actually have a great team.
The resident quooks are right about this. I'm surprised they're surprised though. Kim Doogolds told us this was the biggest win to his little brain a long time ago.
Had we beat Bama this discussion would be closed. Or maybe USC
He doesn't have big wins
Any of the three major bowls would qualify
We play shit non conference teams and Pac 12 teams -
Kim Grinolds is an embarrassment. Please stop letting him speak for UW. The guy has had a hard on for Oregon going back to the matmik days for those of you that remember.
-
Here's what I think is Kim's deal.TommySQC said:Kim Grinolds is an embarrassment. Please stop letting him speak for UW. The guy has had a hard on for Oregon going back to the matmik days for those of you that remember.
He had and has no connection to Washington. He showed up here and is one of those guys who runs right out and starts joining clubs to make him feel like he's really part of the community. Almost like one of those guys who wishes he'd lived another life and had been a frat boy, so he'll try and live it out this way. Insecurity is the key personality defect. He wears it like a shirt.
He did that and created this faux UW Super Fan persona and then doubled down and tried to monetize it. Sark came along and was a wet dream because apparently Kim's enthusiasm gave him some level of pretend access. I think his Oregon thing is all part of that routine. He gets that Washington and Oregon have beef and so as to make himself appear even more legitimate, he goes all in on the Oregon shit. I mean, Derek writes fucking books about Washington football ... actual published fucking books ... and I don't think Derek gets half as worked up about the Ducks or anything else.
You can almost see Kim looking around to make sure someone from the old guard is looking at him when he lays the super fan routine on thick. "See guys? I'm a real Husky just like you. It's like I've always been here!"
I think it's completely disingenuous. I've met him briefly a couple of times at Husky PR events. He's a goofy motherfucker. And good God Fetters is a disgusting pig ... he actually stinks. Like for real. I'm not just writing that. He needs help with hygiene. It's disgusting. -
But we didn't beat Costello. Didn't mean as much to me.dnc said:
I agree it was big. I just think Stanford was bigger. That team at least had a pulse.RaceBannon said:
After 12 straight losses to follow up a Stanford win with another loss to Oregon would have ruined the magical run to a play off loss. Oregon didn't mail it in until after 70-21. And 70-21 on the road after 12 straight losses? Come on man, fuck Grinolds, that was bigdnc said:The Stanford win a week earlier was the biggest win of the Pete era.
The Oregon win just meant the most to people who would rather beat Oregon than actually have a great team.
The resident quooks are right about this. I'm surprised they're surprised though. Kim Doogolds told us this was the biggest win to his little brain a long time ago.
Had we beat Bama this discussion would be closed. Or maybe USC
We humiliated Oregon and they weren't used to that.
Let's face it we didn't beat anyone to win the North that year, because the deciding game was in Pullman. -
Wrong. We were used to it by that point. Did you not see what Utah did to us at home in 2015?haie said:
But we didn't beat Costello. Didn't mean as much to me.dnc said:
I agree it was big. I just think Stanford was bigger. That team at least had a pulse.RaceBannon said:
After 12 straight losses to follow up a Stanford win with another loss to Oregon would have ruined the magical run to a play off loss. Oregon didn't mail it in until after 70-21. And 70-21 on the road after 12 straight losses? Come on man, fuck Grinolds, that was bigdnc said:The Stanford win a week earlier was the biggest win of the Pete era.
The Oregon win just meant the most to people who would rather beat Oregon than actually have a great team.
The resident quooks are right about this. I'm surprised they're surprised though. Kim Doogolds told us this was the biggest win to his little brain a long time ago.
Had we beat Bama this discussion would be closed. Or maybe USC
We humiliated Oregon and they weren't used to that.
Let's face it we didn't beat anyone to win the North that year, because the deciding game was in Pullman. -
It absolutely wasn’t.RaceBannon said:Or the Pac 12 sucks and beating Colorado and Utah is nothing to get excited about
Beating Stanford and Oregon to win the north will always matter more
Your best win this year was in Seattle
And you know it
-
The worst Oregon team in 30 years, rather easily.RaceBannon said:
After 12 straight losses to follow up a Stanford win with another loss to Oregon would have ruined the magical run to a play off loss. Oregon didn't mail it in until after 70-21. And 70-21 on the road after 12 straight losses? Come on man, fuck Grinolds, that was bigdnc said:The Stanford win a week earlier was the biggest win of the Pete era.
The Oregon win just meant the most to people who would rather beat Oregon than actually have a great team.
The resident quooks are right about this. I'm surprised they're surprised though. Kim Doogolds told us this was the biggest win to his little brain a long time ago.
Had we beat Bama this discussion would be closed. Or maybe USC
Oregon did to Washington what you did to us? About 15 times.
Who fucking cares.
-
Sounds like you do
A lot
