Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

According to doogman.com.....

245

Comments

  • haie said:

    Or the Pac 12 sucks and beating Colorado and Utah is nothing to get excited about

    Beating Stanford and Oregon to win the north will always matter more

    Your best win this year was in Seattle

    And you know it

    It really wasn’t. Oregon had the North all but locked up before that game. The Utah game was Oregon’s best win by a long shot, because it was one of the only games this year where Oregon was effective on both sides of the ball.
    qpotd

    It really was.
    I’d rather lose to Washington and win the PAC 12 championship than beat Washington and lose the PAC 12 championship. It’s hard!
  • PandaOrangeChiknDuck
    PandaOrangeChiknDuck Member Posts: 545
    edited December 2019

    haie said:

    Or the Pac 12 sucks and beating Colorado and Utah is nothing to get excited about

    Beating Stanford and Oregon to win the north will always matter more

    Your best win this year was in Seattle

    And you know it

    It really wasn’t. Oregon had the North all but locked up before that game. The Utah game was Oregon’s best win by a long shot, because it was one of the only games this year where Oregon was effective on both sides of the ball.
    qpotd

    It really was.
    I’d rather lose to Washington and win the PAC 12 championship than beat Washington and lose the PAC 12 championship. It’s hard!
    Washington has lost to Oregon 2 of their last three titles

    We live it
    Exactly, which brings us back to my point about how doogish it was for Kim to claim 70-21 was Pete's greatest victory in the Washington era.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,456 Founders Club

    haie said:

    Or the Pac 12 sucks and beating Colorado and Utah is nothing to get excited about

    Beating Stanford and Oregon to win the north will always matter more

    Your best win this year was in Seattle

    And you know it

    It really wasn’t. Oregon had the North all but locked up before that game. The Utah game was Oregon’s best win by a long shot, because it was one of the only games this year where Oregon was effective on both sides of the ball.
    qpotd

    It really was.
    I’d rather lose to Washington and win the PAC 12 championship than beat Washington and lose the PAC 12 championship. It’s hard!
    Washington has lost to Oregon 2 of their last three titles

    We live it
    Exactly, which brings us back to my point about how doogish it was for Kim to claim 70-21 was Pete's greatest victory in the Washington era.
    But my point that it probably was stands

    because I am always right
  • haie said:

    Or the Pac 12 sucks and beating Colorado and Utah is nothing to get excited about

    Beating Stanford and Oregon to win the north will always matter more

    Your best win this year was in Seattle

    And you know it

    It really wasn’t. Oregon had the North all but locked up before that game. The Utah game was Oregon’s best win by a long shot, because it was one of the only games this year where Oregon was effective on both sides of the ball.
    qpotd

    It really was.
    I’d rather lose to Washington and win the PAC 12 championship than beat Washington and lose the PAC 12 championship. It’s hard!
    Washington has lost to Oregon 2 of their last three titles

    We live it
    Exactly, which brings us back to my point about how doogish it was for Kim to claim 70-21 was Pete's greatest victory in the Washington era.
    But my point that it probably was stands

    because I am always right
    I won't dispute that
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,806 Swaye's Wigwam

    haie said:

    Or the Pac 12 sucks and beating Colorado and Utah is nothing to get excited about

    Beating Stanford and Oregon to win the north will always matter more

    Your best win this year was in Seattle

    And you know it

    It really wasn’t. Oregon had the North all but locked up before that game. The Utah game was Oregon’s best win by a long shot, because it was one of the only games this year where Oregon was effective on both sides of the ball.
    qpotd

    It really was.
    I’d rather lose to Washington and win the PAC 12 championship than beat Washington and lose the PAC 12 championship. It’s hard!
    Washington has lost to Oregon 2 of their last three titles

    We live it
    Exactly, which brings us back to my point about how doogish it was for Kim to claim 70-21 was Pete's greatest victory in the Washington era.
    NOGAF what Kim thinks or says aside from the handful of Ty and Sark doogs still lingering there.
  • chuck said:

    haie said:

    Or the Pac 12 sucks and beating Colorado and Utah is nothing to get excited about

    Beating Stanford and Oregon to win the north will always matter more

    Your best win this year was in Seattle

    And you know it

    It really wasn’t. Oregon had the North all but locked up before that game. The Utah game was Oregon’s best win by a long shot, because it was one of the only games this year where Oregon was effective on both sides of the ball.
    qpotd

    It really was.
    I’d rather lose to Washington and win the PAC 12 championship than beat Washington and lose the PAC 12 championship. It’s hard!
    Washington has lost to Oregon 2 of their last three titles

    We live it
    Exactly, which brings us back to my point about how doogish it was for Kim to claim 70-21 was Pete's greatest victory in the Washington era.
    NOGAF what Kim thinks or says aside from the handful of Ty and Sark doogs still lingering there.
    Little brother syndrome isn't broad, it's group by group or person by person. My point being, Doogman and it's community is infected with little brother syndrome, just like the educk community to the other spectrum. I wasn't tying the people here to that. I was making what I thought was an obvious assessment of Kim and the rest of Doogman, nothing more nothing less.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    The Stanford win a week earlier was the biggest win of the Pete era.

    The Oregon win just meant the most to people who would rather beat Oregon than actually have a great team.

    The resident quooks are right about this. I'm surprised they're surprised though. Kim Doogolds told us this was the biggest win to his little brain a long time ago.


  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    dnc said:

    The Stanford win a week earlier was the biggest win of the Pete era.

    The Oregon win just meant the most to people who would rather beat Oregon than actually have a great team.

    The resident quooks are right about this. I'm surprised they're surprised though. Kim Doogolds told us this was the biggest win to his little brain a long time ago.


    After 12 straight losses to follow up a Stanford win with another loss to Oregon would have ruined the magical run to a play off loss. Oregon didn't mail it in until after 70-21. And 70-21 on the road after 12 straight losses? Come on man, fuck Grinolds, that was big

    Had we beat Bama this discussion would be closed. Or maybe USC
    I agree it was big. I just think Stanford was bigger. That team at least had a pulse.