According to doogman.com.....

haie said:

PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

Or the Pac 12 sucks and beating Colorado and Utah is nothing to get excited about

Beating Stanford and Oregon to win the north will always matter more

Your best win this year was in Seattle

And you know it

It really wasn’t. Oregon had the North all but locked up before that game. The Utah game was Oregon’s best win by a long shot, because it was one of the only games this year where Oregon was effective on both sides of the ball.

qpotd

It really was.

I’d rather lose to Washington and win the PAC 12 championship than beat Washington and lose the PAC 12 championship. It’s hard!

RaceBannon said:

PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

haie said:

PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

Or the Pac 12 sucks and beating Colorado and Utah is nothing to get excited about

Beating Stanford and Oregon to win the north will always matter more

Your best win this year was in Seattle

And you know it

It really wasn’t. Oregon had the North all but locked up before that game. The Utah game was Oregon’s best win by a long shot, because it was one of the only games this year where Oregon was effective on both sides of the ball.

qpotd

It really was.

I’d rather lose to Washington and win the PAC 12 championship than beat Washington and lose the PAC 12 championship. It’s hard!

Washington has lost to Oregon 2 of their last three titles

We live it

Exactly, which brings us back to my point about how doogish it was for Kim to claim 70-21 was Pete's greatest victory in the Washington era.

RaceBannon said:

PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

haie said:

PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

Or the Pac 12 sucks and beating Colorado and Utah is nothing to get excited about

Beating Stanford and Oregon to win the north will always matter more

Your best win this year was in Seattle

And you know it

It really wasn’t. Oregon had the North all but locked up before that game. The Utah game was Oregon’s best win by a long shot, because it was one of the only games this year where Oregon was effective on both sides of the ball.

qpotd

It really was.

I’d rather lose to Washington and win the PAC 12 championship than beat Washington and lose the PAC 12 championship. It’s hard!

Washington has lost to Oregon 2 of their last three titles

We live it

Exactly, which brings us back to my point about how doogish it was for Kim to claim 70-21 was Pete's greatest victory in the Washington era.

But my point that it probably was stands

because I am always right

I won't dispute that

chuck said:

PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

haie said:

PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

Or the Pac 12 sucks and beating Colorado and Utah is nothing to get excited about

Beating Stanford and Oregon to win the north will always matter more

Your best win this year was in Seattle

And you know it

It really wasn’t. Oregon had the North all but locked up before that game. The Utah game was Oregon’s best win by a long shot, because it was one of the only games this year where Oregon was effective on both sides of the ball.

qpotd

It really was.

I’d rather lose to Washington and win the PAC 12 championship than beat Washington and lose the PAC 12 championship. It’s hard!

Washington has lost to Oregon 2 of their last three titles

We live it

Exactly, which brings us back to my point about how doogish it was for Kim to claim 70-21 was Pete's greatest victory in the Washington era.

NOGAF what Kim thinks or says aside from the handful of Ty and Sark doogs still lingering there.

Little brother syndrome isn't broad, it's group by group or person by person. My point being, Doogman and it's community is infected with little brother syndrome, just like the educk community to the other spectrum. I wasn't tying the people here to that. I was making what I thought was an obvious assessment of Kim and the rest of Doogman, nothing more nothing less.