Who takes over for Keith Price?
Comments
-
These are the UW records that mr PL_SSFS "deadweight" holds
Single-Season Completion Percentage: .669 (2011)
Career Completion Percentage: .640
Single-Season Passing Efficiency: 161.9 (2011)
Career Passing Efficiency: 143.2
Single-Game Touchdown Passes: 5 (vs. Colorado, 2012; tied)
Single-Season Touchdown Passes: 33 (2011)
Career Touchdown Passes: 75
Career Completions Per Game: 16.5
Single-Season Touchdown Passes Per Game: 2.54 (2011)
Career Touchdown Passes Per Game: 1.630
Single-Season Total Offense Yards Per Attempt: 7.35 (2011) -
And to be thorough here are the UW records that mr. "You're racist if you think hes better than price" jack lockner
Uh...
*crickets* -
This.haie said:Price was great at times, but after the 2012 season he was afraid to do anything. Most of his passes are safe dink and dunks, if his first option wasn't there was he would look to throw it away, etc. Statistically he was the best, no doubt, and I'll take his accuracy over Locker's any day. But Puppy is right in the fact that if nothing was there, Locker could bust up the field and making a huge play out of it. We sorely lacked that from Price in our biggest games this year. I almost wonder if nowadays you need that to win big in college football unless you're Alabama.
Obviously he was more accurate than Locker, but he didn't have the legs or the body to take much punishment. -
I remember jack getting up field, then getting his ass knocked out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
This.haie said:Price was great at times, but after the 2012 season he was afraid to do anything. Most of his passes are safe dink and dunks, if his first option wasn't there was he would look to throw it away, etc. Statistically he was the best, no doubt, and I'll take his accuracy over Locker's any day. But Puppy is right in the fact that if nothing was there, Locker could bust up the field and making a huge play out of it. We sorely lacked that from Price in our biggest games this year. I almost wonder if nowadays you need that to win big in college football unless you're Alabama.
Obviously he was more accurate than Locker, but he didn't have the legs or the body to take much punishment.
I love the guy, will always think he's special to UW, but never saw a top ten pick. -
I still have my Doogles on when it comes to Locker. I'm willing to LIPO one more year with him under Whisenhunt's direction. It might be the first time in his entire career he has had a chance to play with a real head coach.
What i'm saying is, I do believe he would have won the heisman at Oregon and probably a natty, so i'm thankful he chose to come to the shitty program that was/is Washington.
I draft him over Price if i'm building my team as well. -
Lol. You always say that, but I really don't. I think he's a good coordinator, which he is. I wasn't calling for him to be the head coach or act like he was the greatest coach in the world. Oh, but he allowed 50 points as many times as Holt!He_Needs_More_Time said:
Says the guy who worships Wilcox......RoadDawg55 said:
Price played pretty bad against BYU. Mickens dropped a bomb for a TD from Miles. You are as bad as the doogs on doogman when it comes to Price. You actually think Williams or Miles isn't going to be good?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If he can be so easily replaced, why wasn't he easily replaced last year?RoadDawg55 said:
Price was a solid QB, but he's not Andrew Luck. He's probably going undrafted. He can easily be replaced.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You have to be PL_SSFS to think UW can easily replace the best quarterback it has had in a decade.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Anybody that takes over for Price is an immediate improvement. Same can be said for Sark. Now if we can replace more_time, an instant improvement to the bored will occur as well. Good things happen in 3's.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/stats/_/id/264/washington-huskies
-
I will take Price over Locker, but I enjoyed the stuff about patting on the head and getting a lunch box.puppylove_sugarsteel said:And if you think Price can sniff Lockers jock you are more retarded than we all think you are already. There's a reason pro scouts could give a shit less about flashy statistics. What position did Pickett play for San Fran in the NFL? I'm patting u on top of your head, giving u your lunch box and sending you back to school
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z31tJBRffps
I watched this video a bunch last summer while reading Bow Down to Willingham. I don't know what he'll do this year, but I wouldn't be surprise if he takes us back to greatness at some point in his doog career. -
That whole coaching staff sucked. Fuck them! Fuck you! Fuck me! Fuck everyone!RoadDawg55 said:
Lol. You always say that, bHe_Needs_More_Time said:
Says the guy who worships Wilcox......RoadDawg55 said:
Price played pretty bad against BYU. Mickens dropped a bomb for a TD from Miles. You are as bad as the doogs on doogman when it comes to Price. You actually think Williams or Miles isn't going to be good?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If he can be so easily replaced, why wasn't he easily replaced last year?RoadDawg55 said:
Price was a solid QB, but he's not Andrew Luck. He's probably going undrafted. He can easily be replaced.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You have to be PL_SSFS to think UW can easily replace the best quarterback it has had in a decade.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Anybody that takes over for Price is an immediate improvement. Same can be said for Sark. Now if we can replace more_time, an instant improvement to the bored will occur as well. Good things happen in 3's.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/stats/_/id/264/washington-huskies
ut I really don't. I think he's a good coordinator, which he is. I wasn't calling for him to be the head coach or act like he was the greatest coach in the world. Oh, but he allowed 50 points as many times as Holt!
-
Wilcox kept the defense, and really our entire fucking asses, afloat. Our D only shit the bed a few times this year. I don't think Wilcox is amazing, but he did a really good job the last couple years after the eye-stabbing shit we rolled out there in 2011. My only qualm with him was the "9-5" thing he had with the media, and really we fucking hate all those guys anyway so whatever.
-
"New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude...we will see a much improved defense on 9/1"
-
San Fran thought so highly of Pickett that they had him covering kickoffs.puppylove_sugarsteel said:And if you think Price can sniff Lockers jock you are more retarded than we all think you are already. There's a reason pro scouts could give a shit less about flashy statistics. What position did Pickett play for San Fran in the NFL? I'm patting u on top of your head, giving u your lunch box and sending you back to school
-
If Hugh Millen read this thread, his head would explode.
-
-
I cannot wait until training camp 2015, when Tarvaris Jackson, the one quarterback Millen likes less than Wilson, Price, and Stanback, battles Lockner for the Seahawks backup job. He might have a coronary on the air.Swaye said:If Hugh Millen read this thread, his head would explode.
-
3-2-1. . . Your a ray-siss!!!RoadDawg55 said:
Price was a solid QB, but he's not Andrew Luck. He's probably going undrafted. He can easily be replaced.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You have to be PL_SSFS to think UW can easily replace the best quarterback it has had in a decade.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Anybody that takes over for Price is an immediate improvement. Same can be said for Sark. Now if we can replace more_time, an instant improvement to the bored will occur as well. Good things happen in 3's.
-
*you'reCaptainPJ said:
3-2-1. . . Your a ray-siss!!!RoadDawg55 said:
Price was a solid QB, but he's not Andrew Luck. He's probably going undrafted. He can easily be replaced.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You have to be PL_SSFS to think UW can easily replace the best quarterback it has had in a decade.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Anybody that takes over for Price is an immediate improvement. Same can be said for Sark. Now if we can replace more_time, an instant improvement to the bored will occur as well. Good things happen in 3's.
-
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Last time I'll say this. Price is dead weight, can't read downfield and can't escape just long enough to get outside the tackles to throw it away. End of discussion...
Ah, no. Sark The Former Quarterback had no idea what to do with Price. He wanted Price's respect and for Price to trust him (!?) but failed to coach him properly. Don't believe he polished Price's good points nor did he help him much with areas in which he needed guidance. Left Price out there on the field to figure it out for himself while he, Sark, stood on the sideline making frowny faces when Price messed up the field. Watch Price on Youtube after he makes a mistake. He looks beat down.
-
Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge. -
-
Kind of like the toolbox in the other thread telling me if WSU had only recruited better basketball players, they would be big winners. Never realizing the shittiness that is WSU basketball starts and ends with Ken Bone. Much like ours starts and ends with Lorenzo Romar.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Coulda, shoulda, woulda...the rallying cry of all doogs and coogs.
It's always about the Coach. How many times do we have to be right? FFS. -
Agree because Bone has had talent. He inherited a Klay Thompson, Castro and Moore who were all highly rated players and more than capable of going to a sweet 16. He never made the NCAA's with them in three years.Swaye said:
Kind of like the toolbox in the other thread telling me if WSU had only recruited better basketball players, they would be big winners. Never realizing the shittiness that is WSU basketball starts and ends with Ken Bone. Much like ours starts and ends with Lorenzo Romar.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Coulda, shoulda, woulda...the rallying cry of all doogs and coogs.
It's always about the Coach. How many times do we have to be right? FFS.
It's all about coaching yet fuckheads always want to make excuses like "Fiala dropped a pick you can't blame Lambo did he drop that pick" "Would have won that apple cup but Coons missed that kick did Sark miss that kick?" etc. It's always the same bullshit line of excuse and they are always fucking wrong. -
Websites like scout desperately try to perpetuate the myth of the "star ranking" in an effort to put an emphasis on recruiting, and therefore boost subs. It's a fucking sham.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Agree because Bone has had talent. He inherited a Klay Thompson, Castro and Moore who were all highly rated players and more than capable of going to a sweet 16. He never made the NCAA's with them in three years.Swaye said:
Kind of like the toolbox in the other thread telling me if WSU had only recruited better basketball players, they would be big winners. Never realizing the shittiness that is WSU basketball starts and ends with Ken Bone. Much like ours starts and ends with Lorenzo Romar.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Coulda, shoulda, woulda...the rallying cry of all doogs and coogs.
It's always about the Coach. How many times do we have to be right? FFS.
It's all about coaching yet fuckheads always want to make excuses like "Fiala dropped a pick you can't blame Lambo did he drop that pick" "Would have won that apple cup but Coons missed that kick did Sark miss that kick?" etc. It's always the same bullshit line of excuse and they are always fucking wrong.
Will 5 star players generally be better than the 2 star sons of TUFF liberal loggers? Sure, but there are too many other variables that go into whether or not a player will find success to put any merit in star rankings
-
Agree, but the bedrock point is, even the 5 star vs 2 star doesn't matter. It all comes back to the Coach. Sure, I buy the Jimmie's and Joe's argument, but if you don't have good enough players, whose fault is that?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Websites like scout desperately try to perpetuate the myth of the "star ranking" in an effort to put an emphasis on recruiting, and therefore boost subs. It's a fucking sham.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Agree because Bone has had talent. He inherited a Klay Thompson, Castro and Moore who were all highly rated players and more than capable of going to a sweet 16. He never made the NCAA's with them in three years.Swaye said:
Kind of like the toolbox in the other thread telling me if WSU had only recruited better basketball players, they would be big winners. Never realizing the shittiness that is WSU basketball starts and ends with Ken Bone. Much like ours starts and ends with Lorenzo Romar.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Coulda, shoulda, woulda...the rallying cry of all doogs and coogs.
It's always about the Coach. How many times do we have to be right? FFS.
It's all about coaching yet fuckheads always want to make excuses like "Fiala dropped a pick you can't blame Lambo did he drop that pick" "Would have won that apple cup but Coons missed that kick did Sark miss that kick?" etc. It's always the same bullshit line of excuse and they are always fucking wrong.
Will 5 star players generally be better than the 2 star sons of TUFF liberal loggers? Sure, but there are too many other variables that go into whether or not a player will find success to put any merit in star rankings
If you don't have good enough technique, whose fault is that?
If you have lots of injuries and nobody in the two deeps worth a fuck to replace them, whose fault is that?
If your team can't play at altitude, whose fucking fault is it?
If the assistant coaches can't teach for shit, whose fault?
You can run around and around with the fucking excuse matrix all damn day. But after you run yourself ragged making excuses, you come back to one immutable truth. The right Head Coach fixes all the aforementioned shit, and the 300 other things that need to be right to win Conference Championships and go to bowls other than the Macaroni and Cheese Bowl. If you get the HMFIC right, all the other shit will fall into place. Again, same drumbeat from us for years, and the tone deaf still don't fucking get it.
FYFMFE
-
That's what I was implying Tequila, sheeetSwaye said:
Agree, but the bedrock point is, even the 5 star vs 2 star doesn't matter.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Websites like scout desperately try to perpetuate the myth of the "star ranking" in an effort to put an emphasis on recruiting, and therefore boost subs. It's a fucking sham.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Agree because Bone has had talent. He inherited a Klay Thompson, Castro and Moore who were all highly rated players and more than capable of going to a sweet 16. He never made the NCAA's with them in three years.Swaye said:
Kind of like the toolbox in the other thread telling me if WSU had only recruited better basketball players, they would be big winners. Never realizing the shittiness that is WSU basketball starts and ends with Ken Bone. Much like ours starts and ends with Lorenzo Romar.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Coulda, shoulda, woulda...the rallying cry of all doogs and coogs.
It's always about the Coach. How many times do we have to be right? FFS.
It's all about coaching yet fuckheads always want to make excuses like "Fiala dropped a pick you can't blame Lambo did he drop that pick" "Would have won that apple cup but Coons missed that kick did Sark miss that kick?" etc. It's always the same bullshit line of excuse and they are always fucking wrong.
Will 5 star players generally be better than the 2 star sons of TUFF liberal loggers? Sure, but there are too many other variables that go into whether or not a player will find success to put any merit in star rankings -
Just because he was hit by a bus is no reason for him to be throwing players under the busHe_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge. -
Oh I know. My rant was directed at all the other idiots I felt like bullying because they just fucking refuse to get it. I channeled Tequilla for a moment, and BAM, you end up with that shit above. I need some of PL_SS's meds.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
That's what I was implying Tequila, sheeetSwaye said:
Agree, but the bedrock point is, even the 5 star vs 2 star doesn't matter.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Websites like scout desperately try to perpetuate the myth of the "star ranking" in an effort to put an emphasis on recruiting, and therefore boost subs. It's a fucking sham.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Agree because Bone has had talent. He inherited a Klay Thompson, Castro and Moore who were all highly rated players and more than capable of going to a sweet 16. He never made the NCAA's with them in three years.Swaye said:
Kind of like the toolbox in the other thread telling me if WSU had only recruited better basketball players, they would be big winners. Never realizing the shittiness that is WSU basketball starts and ends with Ken Bone. Much like ours starts and ends with Lorenzo Romar.He_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge.
Coulda, shoulda, woulda...the rallying cry of all doogs and coogs.
It's always about the Coach. How many times do we have to be right? FFS.
It's all about coaching yet fuckheads always want to make excuses like "Fiala dropped a pick you can't blame Lambo did he drop that pick" "Would have won that apple cup but Coons missed that kick did Sark miss that kick?" etc. It's always the same bullshit line of excuse and they are always fucking wrong.
Will 5 star players generally be better than the 2 star sons of TUFF liberal loggers? Sure, but there are too many other variables that go into whether or not a player will find success to put any merit in star rankings -
Low twerk.PurpleMicrodot said:
Just because he was hit by a bus is no reason for him to be throwing players under the busHe_Needs_More_Time said:Doogs like PLSS always blame the players never the shitty head coach.
UW will improve next year and Doogs will say because Price is gone. Reality is because Dude Brah is gone and Petersen is in charge. -
"That whole coaching staff sucked. Fuck them! Fuck you! Fuck me! Fuck everyone! "
what about the cheerleaders? -
"That whole coaching staff sucked. Fuck them! Fuck you! Fuck me! Fuck everyone! "Fenwick said:
what aboutthecheerleadersSteve Bowman?
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
