Kangaroo Court
Comments
-
No rational Trumptard arguments here
Also the kangaroo court metaphor fails... That is the Senate's job -
It is interesting watching the rats on here defend the indefensible. It just reveals what life would be like under their socialist control. Kangaroo courts, unequal justice, and the right to equal representation taken away.
The idiots on here think this plays well around the country. It doesn't. The majority out there aren't stupid like these rats and it is going to bite them in the ass. -
The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?ApostleofGrief said:
The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.Sledog said:
Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.ApostleofGrief said:
Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.CirrhosisDawg said:You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.
By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party? -
That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.Sledog said:
The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?ApostleofGrief said:
The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.Sledog said:
Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.ApostleofGrief said:
Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.CirrhosisDawg said:You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.
By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party? -
Fuck off.2001400ex said:
That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.Sledog said:
The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?ApostleofGrief said:
The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.Sledog said:
Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.ApostleofGrief said:
Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.CirrhosisDawg said:You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.
By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party? -
You sound bitter that your guy probably committed an impeachable offense. The sooner you realize this, the lower your stress will be.pawz said:
Fuck off.2001400ex said:
That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.Sledog said:
The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?ApostleofGrief said:
The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.Sledog said:
Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.ApostleofGrief said:
Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.CirrhosisDawg said:You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.
By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party? -
Hondo still repeating this lie.2001400ex said:
Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
Trump isn't in jail. Hasn't been convicted. Been investigated for years2001400ex said:
You sound bitter that your guy probably committed an impeachable offense. The sooner you realize this, the lower your stress will be.pawz said:
Fuck off.2001400ex said:
That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.Sledog said:
The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?ApostleofGrief said:
The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.Sledog said:
Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.ApostleofGrief said:
Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.CirrhosisDawg said:You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.
By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party?
By your own measure Trump is innocent -
Thisis a judicial process fora supposed crime. The accused has rights. HTH2001400ex said:
That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.Sledog said:
The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?ApostleofGrief said:
The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.Sledog said:
Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.ApostleofGrief said:
Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.CirrhosisDawg said:You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.
By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party?
Fucking shitbag commies. -
Leftists here are essentially saying that they know the current process is unfair but they don't care. The Rats in the House could makes this a transparent and open and balanced process but they don't have to and they're fine with that. A process that allows the Rats to veto the witnesses the Republicans can call and to sign off on the questions that can be asked is perfectly okay with them.
If you had any doubts, and I didn't, the Rats don't give a fuck about the truth or the facts. Trump was going to be impeached as soon as they took back the House and the facts never mattered. -
What happened to you're claim that you didn't know if Trump had committed an impeachable offense Hondo?2001400ex said:
You sound bitter that your guy probably committed an impeachable offense. The sooner you realize this, the lower your stress will be.pawz said:
Fuck off.2001400ex said:
That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.Sledog said:
The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?ApostleofGrief said:
The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.Sledog said:
Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.ApostleofGrief said:
Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.CirrhosisDawg said:You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.
By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party? -
Cry harder trumptrash.SFGbob said:Leftists here are essentially saying that they know the current process is unfair but they don't care. The Rats in the House could makes this a transparent and open and balanced process but they don't have to and they're fine with that. A process that allows the Rats to veto the witnesses the Republicans can call and to sign off on the questions that can be asked is perfectly okay with them.
If you had any doubts, and I didn't, the Rats don't give a fuck about the truth or the facts. Trump was going to be impeached as soon as they took back the House and the facts never mattered. -
They don't like the Constitution. Just read it. Be like Justin Amash.CirrhosisDawg said:
Cry harder trumptrash.SFGbob said:Leftists here are essentially saying that they know the current process is unfair but they don't care. The Rats in the House could makes this a transparent and open and balanced process but they don't have to and they're fine with that. A process that allows the Rats to veto the witnesses the Republicans can call and to sign off on the questions that can be asked is perfectly okay with them.
If you had any doubts, and I didn't, the Rats don't give a fuck about the truth or the facts. Trump was going to be impeached as soon as they took back the House and the facts never mattered. -
Are you the dipshit who said Amash was alt right? Or was that another HondoBroTard?ApostleofGrief said:
They don't like the Constitution. Just read it. Be like Justin Amash.CirrhosisDawg said:
Cry harder trumptrash.SFGbob said:Leftists here are essentially saying that they know the current process is unfair but they don't care. The Rats in the House could makes this a transparent and open and balanced process but they don't have to and they're fine with that. A process that allows the Rats to veto the witnesses the Republicans can call and to sign off on the questions that can be asked is perfectly okay with them.
If you had any doubts, and I didn't, the Rats don't give a fuck about the truth or the facts. Trump was going to be impeached as soon as they took back the House and the facts never mattered. -
Still waiting to hear who you are forApostleofGrief said:
They don't like the Constitution. Just read it. Be like Justin Amash.CirrhosisDawg said:
Cry harder trumptrash.SFGbob said:Leftists here are essentially saying that they know the current process is unfair but they don't care. The Rats in the House could makes this a transparent and open and balanced process but they don't have to and they're fine with that. A process that allows the Rats to veto the witnesses the Republicans can call and to sign off on the questions that can be asked is perfectly okay with them.
If you had any doubts, and I didn't, the Rats don't give a fuck about the truth or the facts. Trump was going to be impeached as soon as they took back the House and the facts never mattered.
Faggot -
Yep, that’s the standard El Monte and Hondo both use to defend Hillary.RaceBannon said:
Trump isn't in jail. Hasn't been convicted. Been investigated for years2001400ex said:
You sound bitter that your guy probably committed an impeachable offense. The sooner you realize this, the lower your stress will be.pawz said:
Fuck off.2001400ex said:
That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.Sledog said:
The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?ApostleofGrief said:
The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.Sledog said:
Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.ApostleofGrief said:
Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.CirrhosisDawg said:You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.
By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party?
By your own measure Trump is innocent -
That's your trumptard conflating.MikeDamone said:
Are you the dipshit who said Amash was alt right? Or was that another HondoBroTard?ApostleofGrief said:
They don't like the Constitution. Just read it. Be like Justin Amash.CirrhosisDawg said:
Cry harder trumptrash.SFGbob said:Leftists here are essentially saying that they know the current process is unfair but they don't care. The Rats in the House could makes this a transparent and open and balanced process but they don't have to and they're fine with that. A process that allows the Rats to veto the witnesses the Republicans can call and to sign off on the questions that can be asked is perfectly okay with them.
If you had any doubts, and I didn't, the Rats don't give a fuck about the truth or the facts. Trump was going to be impeached as soon as they took back the House and the facts never mattered.
Justin is conservative. Most of you are alt right -
I’m sure you can back that up after you take race’s cock out of your mouth.SFGbob said:
Yep, that’s the standard El Monte and Hondo both use to defend Hillary.RaceBannon said:
Trump isn't in jail. Hasn't been convicted. Been investigated for years2001400ex said:
You sound bitter that your guy probably committed an impeachable offense. The sooner you realize this, the lower your stress will be.pawz said:
Fuck off.2001400ex said:
That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.Sledog said:
The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?ApostleofGrief said:
The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.Sledog said:
Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.ApostleofGrief said:
Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.CirrhosisDawg said:You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.
By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party?
By your own measure Trump is innocent -
AAAAARRRRGGGGGHHH!!!
Sunday Aaarrrgghy Sunday. -
USMChawk said:
7-11?BearsWiin said:
Marines shouldn't cry so muchUSMChawk said:
It’s almost like you think this won’t bite you in the ass, sometime down the road. Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and the nuclear option say “hi”.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile.
-
Not sure I buy this argument at all. They keep getting voted into office, so there are clearly millions of idiots buying what they are selling. This is the product of a broken education system which needs to be dismantled completely and rebuilt. When jackasses don't even know our own history, why we fought World War 2 and the lessons that should have been learned from that era and from others, we've got a serious problem Houston.Bendintheriver said:It is interesting watching the rats on here defend the indefensible. It just reveals what life would be like under their socialist control. Kangaroo courts, unequal justice, and the right to equal representation taken away.
The idiots on here think this plays well around the country. It doesn't. The majority out there aren't stupid like these rats and it is going to bite them in the ass.
-
Why did we fight WW2???oregonblitzkrieg said:
Not sure I buy this argument at all. They keep getting voted into office, so there are clearly millions of idiots buying what they are selling. This is the product of a broken education system which needs to be dismantled completely and rebuilt. When jackasses don't even know our own history, why we fought World War 2 and the lessons that should have been learned from that era and from others, we've got a serious problem Houston.Bendintheriver said:It is interesting watching the rats on here defend the indefensible. It just reveals what life would be like under their socialist control. Kangaroo courts, unequal justice, and the right to equal representation taken away.
The idiots on here think this plays well around the country. It doesn't. The majority out there aren't stupid like these rats and it is going to bite them in the ass. -
Climate changeThomasFremont said:
Why did we fight WW2???oregonblitzkrieg said:
Not sure I buy this argument at all. They keep getting voted into office, so there are clearly millions of idiots buying what they are selling. This is the product of a broken education system which needs to be dismantled completely and rebuilt. When jackasses don't even know our own history, why we fought World War 2 and the lessons that should have been learned from that era and from others, we've got a serious problem Houston.Bendintheriver said:It is interesting watching the rats on here defend the indefensible. It just reveals what life would be like under their socialist control. Kangaroo courts, unequal justice, and the right to equal representation taken away.
The idiots on here think this plays well around the country. It doesn't. The majority out there aren't stupid like these rats and it is going to bite them in the ass. -
You mean this wasn't the reason?
-
To defeat Communists like Bernie and Warren.ThomasFremont said:
Why did we fight WW2???oregonblitzkrieg said:
Not sure I buy this argument at all. They keep getting voted into office, so there are clearly millions of idiots buying what they are selling. This is the product of a broken education system which needs to be dismantled completely and rebuilt. When jackasses don't even know our own history, why we fought World War 2 and the lessons that should have been learned from that era and from others, we've got a serious problem Houston.Bendintheriver said:It is interesting watching the rats on here defend the indefensible. It just reveals what life would be like under their socialist control. Kangaroo courts, unequal justice, and the right to equal representation taken away.
The idiots on here think this plays well around the country. It doesn't. The majority out there aren't stupid like these rats and it is going to bite them in the ass. -
No. He’s notApostleofGrief said:
That's your trumptard conflating.MikeDamone said:
Are you the dipshit who said Amash was alt right? Or was that another HondoBroTard?ApostleofGrief said:
They don't like the Constitution. Just read it. Be like Justin Amash.CirrhosisDawg said:
Cry harder trumptrash.SFGbob said:Leftists here are essentially saying that they know the current process is unfair but they don't care. The Rats in the House could makes this a transparent and open and balanced process but they don't have to and they're fine with that. A process that allows the Rats to veto the witnesses the Republicans can call and to sign off on the questions that can be asked is perfectly okay with them.
If you had any doubts, and I didn't, the Rats don't give a fuck about the truth or the facts. Trump was going to be impeached as soon as they took back the House and the facts never mattered.
Justin is conservative. Most of you are alt right -
Why? Are you out of PBR? Or Midol?USMChawk said:
7-11?BearsWiin said:
Marines shouldn't cry so muchUSMChawk said:
It’s almost like you think this won’t bite you in the ass, sometime down the road. Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and the nuclear option say “hi”.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
typical trumptard claiming something easily disprovenMikeDamone said:
No. He’s notApostleofGrief said:
That's your trumptard conflating.MikeDamone said:
Are you the dipshit who said Amash was alt right? Or was that another HondoBroTard?ApostleofGrief said:
They don't like the Constitution. Just read it. Be like Justin Amash.CirrhosisDawg said:
Cry harder trumptrash.SFGbob said:Leftists here are essentially saying that they know the current process is unfair but they don't care. The Rats in the House could makes this a transparent and open and balanced process but they don't have to and they're fine with that. A process that allows the Rats to veto the witnesses the Republicans can call and to sign off on the questions that can be asked is perfectly okay with them.
If you had any doubts, and I didn't, the Rats don't give a fuck about the truth or the facts. Trump was going to be impeached as soon as they took back the House and the facts never mattered.
Justin is conservative. Most of you are alt right -
Go for it. You’re closer to a trumptard than amash. Statist fag.ApostleofGrief said:
typical trumptard claiming something easily disprovenMikeDamone said:
No. He’s notApostleofGrief said:
That's your trumptard conflating.MikeDamone said:
Are you the dipshit who said Amash was alt right? Or was that another HondoBroTard?ApostleofGrief said:
They don't like the Constitution. Just read it. Be like Justin Amash.CirrhosisDawg said:
Cry harder trumptrash.SFGbob said:Leftists here are essentially saying that they know the current process is unfair but they don't care. The Rats in the House could makes this a transparent and open and balanced process but they don't have to and they're fine with that. A process that allows the Rats to veto the witnesses the Republicans can call and to sign off on the questions that can be asked is perfectly okay with them.
If you had any doubts, and I didn't, the Rats don't give a fuck about the truth or the facts. Trump was going to be impeached as soon as they took back the House and the facts never mattered.
Justin is conservative. Most of you are alt right -
I don't think sledog paid attention to who posted this before he dropped the chincredible.2001400ex said:
To defeat Communists like Bernie and Warren.ThomasFremont said:
Why did we fight WW2???oregonblitzkrieg said:
Not sure I buy this argument at all. They keep getting voted into office, so there are clearly millions of idiots buying what they are selling. This is the product of a broken education system which needs to be dismantled completely and rebuilt. When jackasses don't even know our own history, why we fought World War 2 and the lessons that should have been learned from that era and from others, we've got a serious problem Houston.Bendintheriver said:It is interesting watching the rats on here defend the indefensible. It just reveals what life would be like under their socialist control. Kangaroo courts, unequal justice, and the right to equal representation taken away.
The idiots on here think this plays well around the country. It doesn't. The majority out there aren't stupid like these rats and it is going to bite them in the ass.
