Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Kangaroo Court
Sledog
Member Posts: 37,641 
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
But how are the democrats not fascists?
-
You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
-
Tulsi voted for this. I'm hearing she is a moderate.
-
Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html -
Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys. -
USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
You sound like a fascist.CirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
If it requires the left's approval it's bullshit. It's all one sided bullshit and trump Ann's everyoneelse needs to refuse to participate.USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
If you get arrested I'm sure you'll want these same rules. -
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
It’s almost like you think this won’t bite you in the ass, sometime down the road. Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and the nuclear option say “hi”.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
Marines shouldn't cry so muchUSMChawk said:
It’s almost like you think this won’t bite you in the ass, sometime down the road. Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and the nuclear option say “hi”.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
You’d think they’d have at least a passing familiarity with the constitution. Guess not.;BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
Hey dumb fuck, I pulled that quote from the link you posted.2001400ex said:
Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
7-11?BearsWiin said:
Marines shouldn't cry so muchUSMChawk said:
It’s almost like you think this won’t bite you in the ass, sometime down the road. Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and the nuclear option say “hi”.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
Their familiarity begins and ends with a couple carefully selected phrases in the 2ACirrhosisDawg said:
You’d think they’d have at least a passing familiarity with the constitution. Guess not.;BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
According to the left, The Constitution is a racist document written by white men.
-
No shit. The original tweet is only mostly bullshit.USMChawk said:
Hey dumb fuck, I pulled that quote from the link you posted.2001400ex said:
Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
Post the Nixon and Clinton rules bitch boy.2001400ex said:
Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.CirrhosisDawg said:You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
-
Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.ApostleofGrief said:
Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.CirrhosisDawg said:You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
-
Well Clinton was impeached without the house investigating him and during a lame duck Congress. Do you think they should go that route?Sledog said:
Post the Nixon and Clinton rules bitch boy.2001400ex said:
Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
Clinton committed perjury. It was plain and simple. Any of us would have been put in jail. Felony most places. He was also disbarred IIRC for it.2001400ex said:
Well Clinton was impeached without the house investigating him and during a lame duck Congress. Do you think they should go that route?Sledog said:
Post the Nixon and Clinton rules bitch boy.2001400ex said:
Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
Wait until Trump gets under oath.Sledog said:
Clinton committed perjury. It was plain and simple. Any of us would have been put in jail. Felony most places. He was also disbarred IIRC for it.2001400ex said:
Well Clinton was impeached without the house investigating him and during a lame duck Congress. Do you think they should go that route?Sledog said:
Post the Nixon and Clinton rules bitch boy.2001400ex said:
Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.Sledog said:
Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.ApostleofGrief said:
Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.CirrhosisDawg said:You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
-
It's not one party impeaching another. It's the House impeaching the president. You will not get anywhere until you accept this.
-
LOL right...ApostleofGrief said:It's not one party impeaching another. It's the House impeaching the president. You will not get anywhere until you accept this.
-
You've just basically ensured you'll be getting Trump for another 4 years. Don't let that distract you from taking a victory lap though.ApostleofGrief said:It's not one party impeaching another. It's the House impeaching the president. You will not get anywhere until you accept this.
-
You could be sorely disappointed. Can't wait for your meltdown.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You've just basically ensured you'll be getting Trump for another 4 years. Don't let that distract you from taking a victory lap though.ApostleofGrief said:It's not one party impeaching another. It's the House impeaching the president. You will not get anywhere until you accept this.
-
You mean like this one?2001400ex said:
You could be sorely disappointed. Can't wait for your meltdown.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You've just basically ensured you'll be getting Trump for another 4 years. Don't let that distract you from taking a victory lap though.ApostleofGrief said:It's not one party impeaching another. It's the House impeaching the president. You will not get anywhere until you accept this.
