It's the offensive line's fault we can't convert a 3rd and 1 fupdate
Comments
-
I've never mentioned one play against OregonRoadDawg55 said:
No you haven’t. It’s one play vs Oregon. I went over this before. You’re arguing to argue. It’s stupid.RaceBannon said:
BullshitRoadDawg55 said:There is one play Race is basing things off. One play that was one of the worst calls I’ve ever witnessed.
The stat DNC is using proves why Ahmed is running good. He’s not a back that can succeed without great blocking.
What one play?
I posted the cal scoring recap for fucks sake
Sounds like you don't have an argument
Check the play by play. None of the drives ended from a sack or not getting it by running.
I didn't even watch the first 52 minutes of the game
You latched onto that early and often but I never said it
I've given plenty of evidence of my position
You just keep making excuses -
You’re wrong. Now you’re inevitably waiting for them to fuck yo vs Utah. If they do, I’ll admit they blew it. They haven’t so far this year.RaceBannon said:
I've never mentioned one play against OregonRoadDawg55 said:
No you haven’t. It’s one play vs Oregon. I went over this before. You’re arguing to argue. It’s stupid.RaceBannon said:
BullshitRoadDawg55 said:There is one play Race is basing things off. One play that was one of the worst calls I’ve ever witnessed.
The stat DNC is using proves why Ahmed is running good. He’s not a back that can succeed without great blocking.
What one play?
I posted the cal scoring recap for fucks sake
Sounds like you don't have an argument
Check the play by play. None of the drives ended from a sack or not getting it by running.
I didn't even watch the first 52 minutes of the game
You latched onto that early and often but I never said it
I've given plenty of evidence of my position
You just keep making excuses
Your FS day at is 5-3 and the FG’s. Good look at the play by plays. None were because we missed short yardage conversions. The OL doesn’t throw and catch the ball. They don’t call the plays.
Criticize what should be criticized. LB’s, WR’s, coaching, DL at times.... It’s not the OL. It’s not hard. Absolutely nothing supports your opinion. -
This is stupid because nobody we played this year probably has a pulse to you. We ran all over USC and Oregon. We were pretty dominant vs Oregon. Those holes were fucking huge.FirePete said:
If the OL was great they would wear other defenses out like furd did our defense. They did it with 6 active OL. Our d took it like lil bitches. I have not seen our OL dominate anyone with a pulse.CallMeBigErn said:FirePete said:
On the list of what is wrong with the team. OL is 3 on my list. ILB,, WR and then OL. But on relative basis to the ILB, our OL is all America level. Still want pete fired.RaceBannon said:
So all of a sudden mediocre is fine with youFirePete said:Ok, so #firehuff @RaceBannon ? I don’t think they are terrible, not great for sure but not the worst line we have seen in the last 5 years
Might want to change your loser er user name. No need to fire Pete. His O line isn't terrible
He's never had a good one. You're the second to damn him with that faint praise
What’s games did we run shitty and Eason was under a lot of pressure all game? None of them. The OL has done their part. They aren’t perfect, but it’s a good OL. We have four really good players and one mediocre one. -
It starts with the O lineRoadDawg55 said:
You’re wrong. Now you’re inevitably waiting for them to fuck yo vs Utah. If they do, I’ll admit they blew it. They haven’t so far this year.RaceBannon said:
I've never mentioned one play against OregonRoadDawg55 said:
No you haven’t. It’s one play vs Oregon. I went over this before. You’re arguing to argue. It’s stupid.RaceBannon said:
BullshitRoadDawg55 said:There is one play Race is basing things off. One play that was one of the worst calls I’ve ever witnessed.
The stat DNC is using proves why Ahmed is running good. He’s not a back that can succeed without great blocking.
What one play?
I posted the cal scoring recap for fucks sake
Sounds like you don't have an argument
Check the play by play. None of the drives ended from a sack or not getting it by running.
I didn't even watch the first 52 minutes of the game
You latched onto that early and often but I never said it
I've given plenty of evidence of my position
You just keep making excuses
Your FS day at is 5-3 and the FG’s. Good look at the play by plays. None were because we missed short yardage conversions. The OL doesn’t throw and catch the ball. They don’t call the plays.
Criticize what should be criticized. LB’s, WR’s, coaching, DL at times.... It’s not the OL. It’s not hard. Absolutely nothing supports your opinion.
Basic shit Roadie
They have fucked up. You already sound nervous about Utah. You should be
5-3 they have fucked up. Bigly. Its an average line at best as the results show
Front runners who fade to black in the 4th quarter. -
You guys are both right. The OL does well generally, but when they really fucking need to get the job done, they dont
I hate when mom and dad fight!!! -
There is a lot of truth in this hence the front runner labelPostGameOrangeSlices said:You guys are both right. The OL does well generally, but when they really fucking need to get the job done, they dont
I hate when mom and dad fight!!!
Pete in general is one of those coaches who struggles once the script runs out of the 20 plays or whatever.
Then it just gets fucking random
If he had Michigan Saturday night against Notre Dame Pete would have started throwing bubble screens and shit instead of just running the damn ball
I suspect that even if Pete ever did get a GREAT O line he'd fuck it up -
My point is that when it needs to happen has been once. Oregon matched down and scored after the punt too. The defense completely collapsed late.PostGameOrangeSlices said:You guys are both right. The OL does well generally, but when they really fucking need to get the job done, they dont
I hate when mom and dad fight!!!
We aren’t losing games because the OL is failing us. Nobody is commenting that the OL sucks in the game threads. All of our RB’s get yards. Eason has plenty of time to pass. He’s not consistently under pressure. These are things a good OL does.
This stat shows the OL is opening holes in the run game. It doesn’t change 5-3 but still. We run the ball well and Eason has time to throw. That’s what you ask an OL to do. They have done it. Case closed.
The OL could always be better. It’s been good this year and it’s just finding something new to bitch about. It’s not accurate. -
Its completely accurate
Red zone failure
Punked by Stanford
Couldn't close against Oregon
Results matter
5 and 3 -
Uncle bumblefuck Race you are wrong on this one.RaceBannon said:
There is a lot of truth in this hence the front runner labelPostGameOrangeSlices said:You guys are both right. The OL does well generally, but when they really fucking need to get the job done, they dont
I hate when mom and dad fight!!!
Pete in general is one of those coaches who struggles once the script runs out of the 20 plays or whatever.
Then it just gets fucking random
If he had Michigan Saturday night against Notre Dame Pete would have started throwing bubble screens and shit instead of just running the damn ball
I suspect that even if Pete ever did get a GREAT O line he'd fuck it up
The OL is not as good as I hoped it would be, probably not as good as it should be.
Its an average, ok, OL
Its not good enough to win games alone, but its also not so bad that its directly causing losses like the WR or ILB.
I remember actual OLs that sucked, Juan Garcia and Ossais on the field... This OL is not that
IMO the short yardage and critical down struggles are largely because of the poor play calling/scheme, a RB that goes down at first contact, and a WR corps so inept the defense can sell out to stop the run or blitz on any short yardage down. -
The OL is not as good as I hoped it would be, probably not as good as it should be.
Its an average, ok, OL
That's what I've been saying
My opponents have no counter so they invent things I didn't say
And they have cost us in our losses
You know I'm used to arguing against crowds of doogs as one lone voice
I'm fine



