It's the offensive line's fault we can't convert a 3rd and 1 fupdate
Comments
-
I've never mentioned one play against OregonRoadDawg55 said:
No you haven’t. It’s one play vs Oregon. I went over this before. You’re arguing to argue. It’s stupid.RaceBannon said:
BullshitRoadDawg55 said:There is one play Race is basing things off. One play that was one of the worst calls I’ve ever witnessed.
The stat DNC is using proves why Ahmed is running good. He’s not a back that can succeed without great blocking.
What one play?
I posted the cal scoring recap for fucks sake
Sounds like you don't have an argument
Check the play by play. None of the drives ended from a sack or not getting it by running.
I didn't even watch the first 52 minutes of the game
You latched onto that early and often but I never said it
I've given plenty of evidence of my position
You just keep making excuses -
You’re wrong. Now you’re inevitably waiting for them to fuck yo vs Utah. If they do, I’ll admit they blew it. They haven’t so far this year.RaceBannon said:
I've never mentioned one play against OregonRoadDawg55 said:
No you haven’t. It’s one play vs Oregon. I went over this before. You’re arguing to argue. It’s stupid.RaceBannon said:
BullshitRoadDawg55 said:There is one play Race is basing things off. One play that was one of the worst calls I’ve ever witnessed.
The stat DNC is using proves why Ahmed is running good. He’s not a back that can succeed without great blocking.
What one play?
I posted the cal scoring recap for fucks sake
Sounds like you don't have an argument
Check the play by play. None of the drives ended from a sack or not getting it by running.
I didn't even watch the first 52 minutes of the game
You latched onto that early and often but I never said it
I've given plenty of evidence of my position
You just keep making excuses
Your FS day at is 5-3 and the FG’s. Good look at the play by plays. None were because we missed short yardage conversions. The OL doesn’t throw and catch the ball. They don’t call the plays.
Criticize what should be criticized. LB’s, WR’s, coaching, DL at times.... It’s not the OL. It’s not hard. Absolutely nothing supports your opinion. -
This is stupid because nobody we played this year probably has a pulse to you. We ran all over USC and Oregon. We were pretty dominant vs Oregon. Those holes were fucking huge.FirePete said:
If the OL was great they would wear other defenses out like furd did our defense. They did it with 6 active OL. Our d took it like lil bitches. I have not seen our OL dominate anyone with a pulse.CallMeBigErn said:FirePete said:
On the list of what is wrong with the team. OL is 3 on my list. ILB,, WR and then OL. But on relative basis to the ILB, our OL is all America level. Still want pete fired.RaceBannon said:
So all of a sudden mediocre is fine with youFirePete said:Ok, so #firehuff @RaceBannon ? I don’t think they are terrible, not great for sure but not the worst line we have seen in the last 5 years
Might want to change your loser er user name. No need to fire Pete. His O line isn't terrible
He's never had a good one. You're the second to damn him with that faint praise
What’s games did we run shitty and Eason was under a lot of pressure all game? None of them. The OL has done their part. They aren’t perfect, but it’s a good OL. We have four really good players and one mediocre one. -
It starts with the O lineRoadDawg55 said:
You’re wrong. Now you’re inevitably waiting for them to fuck yo vs Utah. If they do, I’ll admit they blew it. They haven’t so far this year.RaceBannon said:
I've never mentioned one play against OregonRoadDawg55 said:
No you haven’t. It’s one play vs Oregon. I went over this before. You’re arguing to argue. It’s stupid.RaceBannon said:
BullshitRoadDawg55 said:There is one play Race is basing things off. One play that was one of the worst calls I’ve ever witnessed.
The stat DNC is using proves why Ahmed is running good. He’s not a back that can succeed without great blocking.
What one play?
I posted the cal scoring recap for fucks sake
Sounds like you don't have an argument
Check the play by play. None of the drives ended from a sack or not getting it by running.
I didn't even watch the first 52 minutes of the game
You latched onto that early and often but I never said it
I've given plenty of evidence of my position
You just keep making excuses
Your FS day at is 5-3 and the FG’s. Good look at the play by plays. None were because we missed short yardage conversions. The OL doesn’t throw and catch the ball. They don’t call the plays.
Criticize what should be criticized. LB’s, WR’s, coaching, DL at times.... It’s not the OL. It’s not hard. Absolutely nothing supports your opinion.
Basic shit Roadie
They have fucked up. You already sound nervous about Utah. You should be
5-3 they have fucked up. Bigly. Its an average line at best as the results show
Front runners who fade to black in the 4th quarter. -
You guys are both right. The OL does well generally, but when they really fucking need to get the job done, they dont
I hate when mom and dad fight!!! -
There is a lot of truth in this hence the front runner labelPostGameOrangeSlices said:You guys are both right. The OL does well generally, but when they really fucking need to get the job done, they dont
I hate when mom and dad fight!!!
Pete in general is one of those coaches who struggles once the script runs out of the 20 plays or whatever.
Then it just gets fucking random
If he had Michigan Saturday night against Notre Dame Pete would have started throwing bubble screens and shit instead of just running the damn ball
I suspect that even if Pete ever did get a GREAT O line he'd fuck it up -
My point is that when it needs to happen has been once. Oregon matched down and scored after the punt too. The defense completely collapsed late.PostGameOrangeSlices said:You guys are both right. The OL does well generally, but when they really fucking need to get the job done, they dont
I hate when mom and dad fight!!!
We aren’t losing games because the OL is failing us. Nobody is commenting that the OL sucks in the game threads. All of our RB’s get yards. Eason has plenty of time to pass. He’s not consistently under pressure. These are things a good OL does.
This stat shows the OL is opening holes in the run game. It doesn’t change 5-3 but still. We run the ball well and Eason has time to throw. That’s what you ask an OL to do. They have done it. Case closed.
The OL could always be better. It’s been good this year and it’s just finding something new to bitch about. It’s not accurate. -
Its completely accurate
Red zone failure
Punked by Stanford
Couldn't close against Oregon
Results matter
5 and 3 -
Uncle bumblefuck Race you are wrong on this one.RaceBannon said:
There is a lot of truth in this hence the front runner labelPostGameOrangeSlices said:You guys are both right. The OL does well generally, but when they really fucking need to get the job done, they dont
I hate when mom and dad fight!!!
Pete in general is one of those coaches who struggles once the script runs out of the 20 plays or whatever.
Then it just gets fucking random
If he had Michigan Saturday night against Notre Dame Pete would have started throwing bubble screens and shit instead of just running the damn ball
I suspect that even if Pete ever did get a GREAT O line he'd fuck it up
The OL is not as good as I hoped it would be, probably not as good as it should be.
Its an average, ok, OL
Its not good enough to win games alone, but its also not so bad that its directly causing losses like the WR or ILB.
I remember actual OLs that sucked, Juan Garcia and Ossais on the field... This OL is not that
IMO the short yardage and critical down struggles are largely because of the poor play calling/scheme, a RB that goes down at first contact, and a WR corps so inept the defense can sell out to stop the run or blitz on any short yardage down. -
The OL is not as good as I hoped it would be, probably not as good as it should be.
Its an average, ok, OL
That's what I've been saying
My opponents have no counter so they invent things I didn't say
And they have cost us in our losses
You know I'm used to arguing against crowds of doogs as one lone voice
I'm fine -
Oh and I'm right
-
The OL is not bad, but it is not good either
-
Is that the standard now?FirePete said:The OL is not bad, but it is not good either
What the fuck do you think I've been saying
Doogs -
You saying they suck. I am saying they do not suck, but also not goodRaceBannon said:
Is that the standard now?FirePete said:The OL is not bad, but it is not good either
What the fuck do you think I've been saying
Doogs -
So
They suck
No where you are. This isn't doogman -
is all of this going to lead to a new version of HCH lead by an aspiring writer?
-
If you can’t see this offense is fucked... I can’t help you -
What’s wrong with that play? Looks like a play action rollout to the right. A lot of teams run that.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
If you can’t see this offense is fucked... I can’t help you -
The O line was supposed to be our biggest strength this year and whether you think they're good or bad, they are without a doubt Charmin soft and cost us Oregon where we needed to match scores with them, Cal where we should have run it down their throats all second half, and Stanford where we should have beat them at their own game.
Really the most disappointing aspect of the season because Trey and Center used to have a lot of attitude and heart. -
They can’t run it down Carl’s throat in the 2nd half when runs aren’t called. Ahmed had a good game vs Cal. Newton too. 30 carries for 161 yards between the two of them.haie said:The O line was supposed to be our biggest strength this year and whether you think they're good or bad, they are without a doubt Charmin soft and cost us Oregon where we needed to match scores with them, Cal where we should have run it down their throats all second half, and Stanford where we should have beat them at their own game.
Really the most disappointing aspect of the season because Trey and Center used to have a lot of attitude and heart.
Cal is a disaster now, but that’s still a solid defense that was playing very well at the time. Looking back on the Cal game, it was a precursor to the season. They ran all over us and now can’t run on anyone. -
The defense is inconsistent but we should be winning shootouts when needed (Oregon) and if the offense does what they were predicted to do, and what their talent assumes they should do, then Cal and Stanford would not have had enough clock to come back.RoadDawg55 said:
They can’t run it down Carl’s throat in the 2nd half when runs aren’t called. Ahmed had a good game vs Cal. Newton too. 30 carries for 161 yards between the two of them.haie said:The O line was supposed to be our biggest strength this year and whether you think they're good or bad, they are without a doubt Charmin soft and cost us Oregon where we needed to match scores with them, Cal where we should have run it down their throats all second half, and Stanford where we should have beat them at their own game.
Really the most disappointing aspect of the season because Trey and Center used to have a lot of attitude and heart.
Cal is a disaster now, but that’s still a solid defense that was playing very well at the time. Looking back on the Cal game, it was a precursor to the season. They ran all over us and now can’t run on anyone.
Our fucking offense goes 3 and out faster than any team in this conference and hangs the defense out to dry.
We're so used to 13 and 19 points being acceptable from 2017-18 and it's not. -
Ineligible receiver down field, 10 yard penalty, repeat the down.RoadDawg55 said:
What’s wrong with that play? Looks like a play action rollout to the right. A lot of teams run that.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
If you can’t see this offense is fucked... I can’t help you -
5GrundleStiltzkin said:
Ineligible receiver down field, 10 yard penalty, repeat the down.RoadDawg55 said:
What’s wrong with that play? Looks like a play action rollout to the right. A lot of teams run that.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
If you can’t see this offense is fucked... I can’t help you -
Deadball fowl, Unsportsmanlike conduct, bench, 15 yard penaltydnc said:
5GrundleStiltzkin said:
Ineligible receiver down field, 10 yard penalty, repeat the down.RoadDawg55 said:
What’s wrong with that play? Looks like a play action rollout to the right. A lot of teams run that.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
If you can’t see this offense is fucked... I can’t help you -
Stopped reading after the first page when this inevitably devolves into shitty doog posts that I don’t care to read.
Race, my alt, is right. As always. After the Cal game I pointed out that Pete has never had a real DAWG oline and was right as well.
They are front running fucks (pun intended) who shrivel up when it really counts. Like scoring TDs and converting to extend drives. Pete needs to fix it or his reputation will continue to be that of a Jake Browning soft loser coach.
6 years now. Take solace in the advanced metrics you @HeretoBeatmyChest fucking doog losers. -
Yikes. Easy to spot now.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Ineligible receiver down field, 10 yard penalty, repeat the down.RoadDawg55 said:
What’s wrong with that play? Looks like a play action rollout to the right. A lot of teams run that.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
If you can’t see this offense is fucked... I can’t help you -
Agree with my altPurpleJ said:Stopped reading after the first page when this inevitably devolves into shitty doog posts that I don’t care to read.
Race, my alt, is right. As always. After the Cal game I pointed out that Pete has never had a real DAWG oline and was right as well.
They are front running fucks (pun intended) who shrivel up when it really counts. Like scoring TDs and converting to extend drives. Pete needs to fix it or his reputation will continue to be that of a Jake Browning soft loser coach.
6 years now. Take solace in the advanced metrics you @HeretoBeatmyChest fucking doog losers.
Or am I the alt? -
I mean the RB is supposed to end up just behind the LOS to receive the screen no?RoadDawg55 said:
Yikes. Easy to spot now.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Ineligible receiver down field, 10 yard penalty, repeat the down.RoadDawg55 said:
What’s wrong with that play? Looks like a play action rollout to the right. A lot of teams run that.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
If you can’t see this offense is fucked... I can’t help you -
We all somebody’s alt.RaceBannon said:
Agree with my altPurpleJ said:Stopped reading after the first page when this inevitably devolves into shitty doog posts that I don’t care to read.
Race, my alt, is right. As always. After the Cal game I pointed out that Pete has never had a real DAWG oline and was right as well.
They are front running fucks (pun intended) who shrivel up when it really counts. Like scoring TDs and converting to extend drives. Pete needs to fix it or his reputation will continue to be that of a Jake Browning soft loser coach.
6 years now. Take solace in the advanced metrics you @HeretoBeatmyChest fucking doog losers.
Or am I the alt?
@MultiverseDawg -
Confirmed that @dnc is the only one here who knows footballdnc said:
I mean the RB is supposed to end up just behind the LOS to receive the screen no?RoadDawg55 said:
Yikes. Easy to spot now.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Ineligible receiver down field, 10 yard penalty, repeat the down.RoadDawg55 said:
What’s wrong with that play? Looks like a play action rollout to the right. A lot of teams run that.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
If you can’t see this offense is fucked... I can’t help you
