Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Democracy dies in darkness update

1234689

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,818
    SFGbob said:

    You're getting overheated O'Keefed. You can't even keep track of the bullshit you're spewing.
    Declaring victory? Bold!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181
    HHusky said:

    Declaring victory? Bold!
    Sucking cock. Bold!

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    The best part is. Trumptards are whining that the investigation isn't on TV and referencing Clinton. They don't even know that the house didn't investigate Clinton, they just held an impeachment vote during the lame duck Congress. The investigation into Clinton was by an independent counsel and was not on TV.

    But your news source said Clinton!!! So you repeat it here.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,021 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    2001400ex said:

    The best part is. Trumptards are whining that the investigation isn't on TV and referencing Clinton. They don't even know that the house didn't investigate Clinton, they just held an impeachment vote during the lame duck Congress. The investigation into Clinton was by an independent counsel and was not on TV.

    But your news source said Clinton!!! So you repeat it here.

    Secret. What you have to try and do because you don't have the votes. Never been done before but hey you don't have the votes for a legal witch hunt lynching coup.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Secret. What you have to try and do because you don't have the votes. Never been done before but hey you don't have the votes for a legal witch hunt lynching coup.
    Read up on Clinton. I know you like to say it's never been done before cause your news source said so. You ever feel lied to?
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,674 Standard Supporter
    ramenduck said:

    His/her complaint explicitly named many of the witnesses that have now been interviewed and whom we are currently discussing. That this would occur was explained to you very early on.

    I know this stuff moves a little fast for you, Atl but do keep up.




    You have no fucking idea what has happened as of yet. You know why? Because this whole 3rd world ram rod shitf has going is in secret. The only thing you know is what is being leaked and the only thing being leaked is what schitf is leaking. Any smart adult knows this is a complete sham of an investigation. If one side cannot present anything and is continually stopped during questioning, this is a set up and a Soviet style trial. You should be ashamed of yourselves but you like this kangaroo court type of power.
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,674 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    No one concluded there wasn’t any evidence of collusion, blob. You seem rattled.
    Uhh millions concluded there was Zero collusion HH. Mueller concluded there was zero collusion, AG concluded there was zero collusion. I know you socialists want so hard, so very, very hard to make believe there was collusion, but after 2.5 years and $50Million bucks you got a big fat goose egg.

    Now if you want to talk about The Bitch and BO's collusion with the Russians and their lying to a FISA court and illegally wire tapping a Presidential campaign headquarters, we can probably find the real collusion but I don't think you want any of that now do you? The fact you socialists don't want that investigation to happen completely negates any point you make about Trump. You are literally a joke.
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,674 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Seriously. You girls need some brushing up on basic logic. The hearsay of the whistleblower has been confirmed as accurate.
    Again, no it hasn't. Either you are flat out lying or you are ignorant, you pick.

    No one knows who the whistle blower is and no one but Rats have spoken to the individual. There is zero proof of any accuracy. Not only that, the whistleblower is supposedly a third hand source and just happens to be an ex-Biden staffer who is a big rat supporter.

    Go ahead though HH, give us the article that details the accuracy of the whistleblower. This ought to be good.
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,674 Standard Supporter


    You have to admire Race’s willingness to argue there are no grounds for impeachment even as many of the grounds become more obvious.

    Ha ha ha........please, for the 20th time, list for us all of those "grounds" counselor.

    You rats keep on saying this garbage and you have nothing to back it up with. You sound ridiculous and immature. Grow a set buddy and act like an adult.
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    4 straight Atl posts and each with at least one lie. Sweet geezus man seek help.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 16,774 Standard Supporter
    So, what are the grounds for impeachment and what are the facts supporting a Trump-Russian collusion that all you leftards feel so strongly about. I usually tell the counselor that I pity his clients. In your case, I hope you are one of them and are paying him what he deserves.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Uhh millions concluded there was Zero collusion HH. Mueller concluded there was zero collusion, AG concluded there was zero collusion. I know you socialists want so hard, so very, very hard to make believe there was collusion, but after 2.5 years and $50Million bucks you got a big fat goose egg.

    Now if you want to talk about The Bitch and BO's collusion with the Russians and their lying to a FISA court and illegally wire tapping a Presidential campaign headquarters, we can probably find the real collusion but I don't think you want any of that now do you? The fact you socialists don't want that investigation to happen completely negates any point you make about Trump. You are literally a joke.
    Mueller did not conclude there was no conclusion. But facts have never been your strong suit.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181
    2001400ex said:

    Mueller did not conclude there was no conclusion. But facts have never been your strong suit.

    Fucking moron. Does anyone speak barely literate cocksucker?

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181
    Mueller did not conclude there was no conclusion

    Hondo, the fucking moronic gift that keeps on giving.
  • ramenduckramenduck Member Posts: 734

    Again, no it hasn't. Either you are flat out lying or you are ignorant, you pick.

    No one knows who the whistle blower is and no one but Rats have spoken to the individual. There is zero proof of any accuracy. Not only that, the whistleblower is supposedly a third hand source and just happens to be an ex-Biden staffer who is a big rat supporter.

    Go ahead though HH, give us the article that details the accuracy of the whistleblower. This ought to be good.
    For the second time.

    Feel free to quibble with the annotations. But let’s be honest, you’re too lazy to read it, too dumb to comprehend it, and you’ll be asking for it again in a week.

    https://www.justsecurity.org/66475/ukraine-ukrainegate-overwhelming-confirmation-of-whistleblower-complaint-an-annotation/
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Mueller did not conclude there was no conclusion

    Hondo, the fucking moronic gift that keeps on giving.

    Are you so stupid that you don't get the last word should be collusion? I know the answer but you should think about it.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181
    2001400ex said:

    Are you so stupid that you don't get the last word should be collusion? I know the answer but you should think about it.
    Yeah, you write like a fucking retard but I'm the stupid one. Here's a hint Hondo. Don't say stupid shit and I won't call you out on it. Deal? And I'll actually quote the stupid shit you say.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 36,021 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Read up on Clinton. I know you like to say it's never been done before cause your news source said so. You ever feel lied to?
    Please poont out the impeachment investigation that was begun without a majority vote in the house.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Sledog said:

    Please poont out the impeachment investigation that was begun without a majority vote in the house.
    Andrew Johnson.
Sign In or Register to comment.