Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Democracy dies in darkness update

191012141518

Comments

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,898 Standard Supporter
    So, what are the grounds for impeachment and what are the facts supporting a Trump-Russian collusion that all you leftards feel so strongly about. I usually tell the counselor that I pity his clients. In your case, I hope you are one of them and are paying him what he deserves.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    The FBI investigated and discovered a connection between cash found on the burglars and a slush fund used by the Committee for the Re-Election of the President (CRP), the official organization of Nixon's campaign.[6][7] In July 1973, evidence mounted against the president's staff, including testimony provided by former staff members in an investigation conducted by the Senate Watergate Committee. The investigation revealed that Nixon had a tape-recording system in his offices and that he had recorded many conversations.[8][9]

    After a series of court battles, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously ruled that the president was obligated to release the tapes to government investigators (United States v. Nixon). The tapes revealed that Nixon had attempted to cover up activities that took place after the break-in, and to use federal officials to deflect the investigation.[7][10] Facing virtually certain impeachment in the House of Representatives and equally certain conviction by the Senate, Nixon resigned the presidency on August 9, 1974, preventing the House from impeaching him.[11][12] On September 8, 1974, his successor, Gerald Ford, pardoned him.


    All on TV

    Weird because O'Keefed told us that they have to hold these proceedings secret so that witnesses can't corroborate their stories
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    The reason Nixon ultimately resigned was that the Watergate Hearings were must see TV in 1973 and the Impeachment hearings were also on TV. Not in HD though.

    And get this, they finally got the smoking gun and bi partisan agreement that it was time to LEAVE for Dick

    The Clinton Impeachment was considered more partisan partly because it was and mostly because Clinton has a (D) behind his name. It was also televised and ultimately doomed to a no conviction vote even though Bubba did break the law and end up disbarred. People didn't much care

    But our current democrats once again insisting on fucking things up, have never settled on what exactly they want to impeach Trump for, failed on a Special Counsel, and now are throwing shit at the wall about anything they can make up with fake whistle blowers and morons claiming that daddy confessed they just can't show you where

    Scandals need a hook like anything else which is why after Watergate every scandal was given a gate after it for years. Spying on the DNC and covering it up was an understandable scandal and there were tapes and daddy did confess and it still took a couple years.

    This is nothing like that and wet dreams of Trump suddenly resigning are fucking stupid. This is the life Trump has lived. He's out doing rallies not holed up talking to portraits in the White House.

    Sam Darnold and Donald Trump live for moments like this

    But please continue

    You have to admire Race’s willingness to argue there are no grounds for impeachment even as many of the grounds become more obvious.
    So obvious you can't point them out
    Obstruction of justice

    Suborning perjury

    Soliciting foreign aid in a US political campaign.


    Not difficult.
    Now all you need is proof

    Sounds serious. May make good articles of impeachment
    Gosh what happened to collusion with the Russians?
    I chose to stick with the ones that only a cock sucking Trumptard could possibly deny.
    So you admit, that there wasn't any evidence of collusion to the Russians. Fuck off comrade.
    No one concluded there wasn’t any evidence of collusion, blob. You seem rattled.
    Uhh millions concluded there was Zero collusion HH. Mueller concluded there was zero collusion, AG concluded there was zero collusion. I know you socialists want so hard, so very, very hard to make believe there was collusion, but after 2.5 years and $50Million bucks you got a big fat goose egg.

    Now if you want to talk about The Bitch and BO's collusion with the Russians and their lying to a FISA court and illegally wire tapping a Presidential campaign headquarters, we can probably find the real collusion but I don't think you want any of that now do you? The fact you socialists don't want that investigation to happen completely negates any point you make about Trump. You are literally a joke.
    Mueller did not conclude there was no conclusion. But facts have never been your strong suit.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    The FBI investigated and discovered a connection between cash found on the burglars and a slush fund used by the Committee for the Re-Election of the President (CRP), the official organization of Nixon's campaign.[6][7] In July 1973, evidence mounted against the president's staff, including testimony provided by former staff members in an investigation conducted by the Senate Watergate Committee. The investigation revealed that Nixon had a tape-recording system in his offices and that he had recorded many conversations.[8][9]

    After a series of court battles, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously ruled that the president was obligated to release the tapes to government investigators (United States v. Nixon). The tapes revealed that Nixon had attempted to cover up activities that took place after the break-in, and to use federal officials to deflect the investigation.[7][10] Facing virtually certain impeachment in the House of Representatives and equally certain conviction by the Senate, Nixon resigned the presidency on August 9, 1974, preventing the House from impeaching him.[11][12] On September 8, 1974, his successor, Gerald Ford, pardoned him.


    All on TV

    Weird because O'Keefed told us that they have to hold these proceedings secret so that witnesses can't corroborate their stories
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    The reason Nixon ultimately resigned was that the Watergate Hearings were must see TV in 1973 and the Impeachment hearings were also on TV. Not in HD though.

    And get this, they finally got the smoking gun and bi partisan agreement that it was time to LEAVE for Dick

    The Clinton Impeachment was considered more partisan partly because it was and mostly because Clinton has a (D) behind his name. It was also televised and ultimately doomed to a no conviction vote even though Bubba did break the law and end up disbarred. People didn't much care

    But our current democrats once again insisting on fucking things up, have never settled on what exactly they want to impeach Trump for, failed on a Special Counsel, and now are throwing shit at the wall about anything they can make up with fake whistle blowers and morons claiming that daddy confessed they just can't show you where

    Scandals need a hook like anything else which is why after Watergate every scandal was given a gate after it for years. Spying on the DNC and covering it up was an understandable scandal and there were tapes and daddy did confess and it still took a couple years.

    This is nothing like that and wet dreams of Trump suddenly resigning are fucking stupid. This is the life Trump has lived. He's out doing rallies not holed up talking to portraits in the White House.

    Sam Darnold and Donald Trump live for moments like this

    But please continue

    You have to admire Race’s willingness to argue there are no grounds for impeachment even as many of the grounds become more obvious.
    So obvious you can't point them out
    Obstruction of justice

    Suborning perjury

    Soliciting foreign aid in a US political campaign.


    Not difficult.
    Now all you need is proof

    Sounds serious. May make good articles of impeachment
    Gosh what happened to collusion with the Russians?
    I chose to stick with the ones that only a cock sucking Trumptard could possibly deny.
    So you admit, that there wasn't any evidence of collusion to the Russians. Fuck off comrade.
    No one concluded there wasn’t any evidence of collusion, blob. You seem rattled.
    Uhh millions concluded there was Zero collusion HH. Mueller concluded there was zero collusion, AG concluded there was zero collusion. I know you socialists want so hard, so very, very hard to make believe there was collusion, but after 2.5 years and $50Million bucks you got a big fat goose egg.

    Now if you want to talk about The Bitch and BO's collusion with the Russians and their lying to a FISA court and illegally wire tapping a Presidential campaign headquarters, we can probably find the real collusion but I don't think you want any of that now do you? The fact you socialists don't want that investigation to happen completely negates any point you make about Trump. You are literally a joke.
    Mueller did not conclude there was no conclusion. But facts have never been your strong suit.

    Fucking moron. Does anyone speak barely literate cocksucker?

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    Mueller did not conclude there was no conclusion

    Hondo, the fucking moronic gift that keeps on giving.
  • ramenduck
    ramenduck Member Posts: 734

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    The reason Nixon ultimately resigned was that the Watergate Hearings were must see TV in 1973 and the Impeachment hearings were also on TV. Not in HD though.

    And get this, they finally got the smoking gun and bi partisan agreement that it was time to LEAVE for Dick

    The Clinton Impeachment was considered more partisan partly because it was and mostly because Clinton has a (D) behind his name. It was also televised and ultimately doomed to a no conviction vote even though Bubba did break the law and end up disbarred. People didn't much care

    But our current democrats once again insisting on fucking things up, have never settled on what exactly they want to impeach Trump for, failed on a Special Counsel, and now are throwing shit at the wall about anything they can make up with fake whistle blowers and morons claiming that daddy confessed they just can't show you where

    Scandals need a hook like anything else which is why after Watergate every scandal was given a gate after it for years. Spying on the DNC and covering it up was an understandable scandal and there were tapes and daddy did confess and it still took a couple years.

    This is nothing like that and wet dreams of Trump suddenly resigning are fucking stupid. This is the life Trump has lived. He's out doing rallies not holed up talking to portraits in the White House.

    Sam Darnold and Donald Trump live for moments like this

    But please continue

    You have to admire Race’s willingness to argue there are no grounds for impeachment even as many of the grounds become more obvious.
    So obvious you can't point them out
    Obstruction of justice

    Suborning perjury

    Soliciting foreign aid in a US political campaign.


    Not difficult.
    Now all you need is proof

    Sounds serious. May make good articles of impeachment
    Gosh what happened to collusion with the Russians?
    What happened to the "witness"? Schitf met with, coached and then lawyered up the fake witness with 15th hand information. A witness who worked for biden and was a big rat supporter no less. Now we haven't heard a peep.
    Seriously. You girls need some brushing up on basic logic. The hearsay of the whistleblower has been confirmed as accurate.
    Again, no it hasn't. Either you are flat out lying or you are ignorant, you pick.

    No one knows who the whistle blower is and no one but Rats have spoken to the individual. There is zero proof of any accuracy. Not only that, the whistleblower is supposedly a third hand source and just happens to be an ex-Biden staffer who is a big rat supporter.

    Go ahead though HH, give us the article that details the accuracy of the whistleblower. This ought to be good.
    For the second time.

    Feel free to quibble with the annotations. But let’s be honest, you’re too lazy to read it, too dumb to comprehend it, and you’ll be asking for it again in a week.

    https://www.justsecurity.org/66475/ukraine-ukrainegate-overwhelming-confirmation-of-whistleblower-complaint-an-annotation/
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Mueller did not conclude there was no conclusion

    Hondo, the fucking moronic gift that keeps on giving.

    Are you so stupid that you don't get the last word should be collusion? I know the answer but you should think about it.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mueller did not conclude there was no conclusion

    Hondo, the fucking moronic gift that keeps on giving.

    Are you so stupid that you don't get the last word should be collusion? I know the answer but you should think about it.
    Yeah, you write like a fucking retard but I'm the stupid one. Here's a hint Hondo. Don't say stupid shit and I won't call you out on it. Deal? And I'll actually quote the stupid shit you say.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,570 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    The best part is. Trumptards are whining that the investigation isn't on TV and referencing Clinton. They don't even know that the house didn't investigate Clinton, they just held an impeachment vote during the lame duck Congress. The investigation into Clinton was by an independent counsel and was not on TV.

    But your news source said Clinton!!! So you repeat it here.

    Secret. What you have to try and do because you don't have the votes. Never been done before but hey you don't have the votes for a legal witch hunt lynching coup.
    Read up on Clinton. I know you like to say it's never been done before cause your news source said so. You ever feel lied to?
    Please poont out the impeachment investigation that was begun without a majority vote in the house.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    The best part is. Trumptards are whining that the investigation isn't on TV and referencing Clinton. They don't even know that the house didn't investigate Clinton, they just held an impeachment vote during the lame duck Congress. The investigation into Clinton was by an independent counsel and was not on TV.

    But your news source said Clinton!!! So you repeat it here.

    Secret. What you have to try and do because you don't have the votes. Never been done before but hey you don't have the votes for a legal witch hunt lynching coup.
    Read up on Clinton. I know you like to say it's never been done before cause your news source said so. You ever feel lied to?
    Please poont out the impeachment investigation that was begun without a majority vote in the house.
    Andrew Johnson.