We are fucked no matter what EASON does
Comments
-
By November 2000 I remember we were averaging something like 275 yards rushing a game. (during that stretch of time)PurpleJ said:Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug
))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly. -
RaceBannon said:
They aren't goodRoadDawg55 said:
Eason doesn’t get sacked much. They aren’t bad at all. Pretty far down the list of problems.RaceBannon said:A lot of posters here have never seen a good O line at UW
This isn't one
When you have Skinny doing the Browning you don't have good pass pro
I like to call it pass pro
And they get stuffed on short yardage and when it counts.
And they suck in the red zone
A good O line does what Oregon did and our last drive rams our purple cocks down their flat faced bills
Not getting to 3rd and 23
We were fine in short yardage until Newton got hurt. We suck in the red zone for a lot of reasons. OL is one of them, sure.
At all
Disagree.
Playing the smurfs together hurt the offense big time and made the OL look bad. The WRs couldn't get open; Eason had no one to throw to and held the ball too long making him vulnerable for sacks on blitzes. Knowing our WRs sucked, defenses loaded up the box and limited our run game.
As soon as the offense began using Puka in the second half of the AZ game the offense and the line have been nails. They've scored 69 points the last four quarters --46 ppg average--the majority against Oregon one of the top defenses in the country without Dick and McGrew. During this span, the OL has allowed only 1 sack.
Excluding Kamaris wildcat guffaws and Eason's lost fumble, the offense generated more yards than Oregon.
It sucks Peterman and crue waited on using the younger WRs but I like where the Offense and the OL are right now.
-
Disagree
-
The o-line is good, not great. The running game sucks because of play-calling and lack of talented running backs. Eason gets sacked because nobody's fucking open to throw most of the time, because of the no-talent WRs and shitty play design.
-
Wow. Logic and insight. Unexpected from this place.Baseman said:RaceBannon said:
They aren't goodRoadDawg55 said:
Eason doesn’t get sacked much. They aren’t bad at all. Pretty far down the list of problems.RaceBannon said:A lot of posters here have never seen a good O line at UW
This isn't one
When you have Skinny doing the Browning you don't have good pass pro
I like to call it pass pro
And they get stuffed on short yardage and when it counts.
And they suck in the red zone
A good O line does what Oregon did and our last drive rams our purple cocks down their flat faced bills
Not getting to 3rd and 23
We were fine in short yardage until Newton got hurt. We suck in the red zone for a lot of reasons. OL is one of them, sure.
At all
Disagree.
Playing the smurfs together hurt the offense big time and made the OL look bad. The WRs couldn't get open; Eason had no one to throw to and held the ball too long making him vulnerable for sacks on blitzes. Knowing our WRs sucked, defenses loaded up the box and limited our run game.
As soon as the offense began using Puka in the second half of the AZ game the offense and the line have been nails. They've scored 69 points the last four quarters --46 ppg average--the majority against Oregon one of the top defenses in the country without Dick and McGrew. During this span, the OL has allowed only 1 sack.
Excluding Kamaris wildcat guffaws and Eason's lost fumble, the offense generated more yards than Oregon.
It sucks Peterman and crue waited on using the younger WRs but I like where the Offense and the OL are right now. -
So excluding the negative plays, they played well. lolBaseman said:Disagree.
Playing the smurfs together hurt the offense big time and made the OL look bad. The WRs couldn't get open; Eason had no one to throw to and held the ball too long making him vulnerable for sacks on blitzes. Knowing our WRs sucked, defenses loaded up the box and limited our run game.
As soon as the offense began using Puka in the second half of the AZ game the offense and the line have been nails. They've scored 69 points the last four quarters --46 ppg average--the majority against Oregon one of the top defenses in the country without Dick and McGrew. During this span, the OL has allowed only 1 sack.
Excluding Kamaris wildcat guffaws and Eason's lost fumble, the offense generated more yards than Oregon.
It sucks Peterman and crue waited on using the younger WRs but I like where the Offense and the OL are right now. -
With Tui running the option.DerekJohnson said:
By November 2000 I remember we were averaging something like 275 yards rushing a game. (during that stretch of time)PurpleJ said:Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug
))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly.
-
We are tied for second in the conference with Oregon in offensive points scored and allow fewer sacks per game than the Ducks.
With the offensive changes, we will end the year with the best offense in the conference.
Unfortunately Pete's tardedness --sticking with Fuller and Baciella, keeping Gregory after 2017 -- have fucked the season.
-
Consider that Eason is also pretty immobile, especially relative to a guy like Herbert, and our pass protection has been fantastic this year. Our run game has also been very above average, even if there have been a few fuck-ups at extremely inopportune moments. The OL is good and only looking to get better with the way we've recruited these last two years. It's probably the unit I'm least concerned about, including DBs.Baseman said:We are tied for second in the conference with Oregon in offensive points scored and allow fewer sacks per game than the Ducks.
With the offensive changes, we will end the year with the best offense in the conference.
Unfortunately Pete's tardedness --sticking with Fuller and Baciella, keeping Gregory after 2017 -- have fucked the season. -
Dude harris is like our best OL, wtf are you talking about.backthepack said:He’s working with a 6 foot 310 lb center. Hilbers who he has actually turned into a decent player. Trey who has a fucked back. Wattenberg has improved. Jaws has been good s/o Huff.
It’s hard when you don’t have a lot of talent to work with. But he’s done a good with the limited talent + injuries he’s had.






