Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

More damaging leaks

2

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,764 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    Go ahead - explain it.

    We have discussed it many many times. But Bidens scenario, other countries wanted him removed. Biden is a cocky bastard and was bragging about what he did that he really didn't have much influence over.
    Did Biden or did Biden not say that loan guarantees were withheld and indicated he was an authorized agent acting on the behalf of the President of the United State of America?

    FF to 0:34 if you need help.



    I know exactly what Biden said and alluded to it in my comment. And explained exactly why is different. Stick to posting hot chicks. I expect people like Race and Daboner to carry water for Trump, you are better than that.
    On numerous occasions I have stated, I give no fucks about Trump. But he's the lesser of two evils relative to what the 'liberals' are vomiting out there.

    And, hold independently the thought that is IS possible to give no fucks about Trump either direction (Hi there TDS sufferers) and see that the Bidens and the Clintons and very likely the Obamas are slimy as fuck -except their daughters aren't old enough to drink from the silver trough yet.

    If you're going after Trump, you go after Biden simultaneously. Instead it's business as usual and fuck all gets done.

    Wake up, sheeple.




    Biden is just corrupt as all of them. I'm just saying that the situations are completely different on Ukraine. Just like I say Hunter used his dad's influence for an overpaid board position, it's not illegal but probably should be.

    If you looked at the Ukraine scenarios, you'd see how they are different.
    Oh now it's an "overpaid" board position. Just last week you lying Kunt you were dismissing the amount of money he was paid to sit on the board.

    What's it like being a lying piece of shit with no integrity Hondo?
    Pathetic. He's stuck in a burger flipping nightmare!
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    Go ahead - explain it.

    We have discussed it many many times. But Bidens scenario, other countries wanted him removed. Biden is a cocky bastard and was bragging about what he did that he really didn't have much influence over.
    Did Biden or did Biden not say that loan guarantees were withheld and indicated he was an authorized agent acting on the behalf of the President of the United State of America?

    FF to 0:34 if you need help.



    I know exactly what Biden said and alluded to it in my comment. And explained exactly why is different. Stick to posting hot chicks. I expect people like Race and Daboner to carry water for Trump, you are better than that.
    On numerous occasions I have stated, I give no fucks about Trump. But he's the lesser of two evils relative to what the 'liberals' are vomiting out there.

    And, hold independently the thought that is IS possible to give no fucks about Trump either direction (Hi there TDS sufferers) and see that the Bidens and the Clintons and very likely the Obamas are slimy as fuck -except their daughters aren't old enough to drink from the silver trough yet.

    If you're going after Trump, you go after Biden simultaneously. Instead it's business as usual and fuck all gets done.

    Wake up, sheeple.




    Biden is just corrupt as all of them. I'm just saying that the situations are completely different on Ukraine. Just like I say Hunter used his dad's influence for an overpaid board position, it's not illegal but probably should be.

    If you looked at the Ukraine scenarios, you'd see how they are different.
    You should have stopped at your first sentence.
    Do you not like facts?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,886 Founders Club
    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

  • ramenduck
    ramenduck Member Posts: 734

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898

    Look at the shill right on time

    Hondo wouldn't know the truth if it curb stomped him to death

    Why pretend you’re concerned about the truth when your team is denying the admitted and the obvious?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,886 Founders Club
    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,886 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Look at the shill right on time

    Hondo wouldn't know the truth if it curb stomped him to death

    Why pretend you’re concerned about the truth when your team is denying the admitted and the obvious?
    Of course the daddy confession you can't show us

    Pathological liars
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898

    HHusky said:

    Look at the shill right on time

    Hondo wouldn't know the truth if it curb stomped him to death

    Why pretend you’re concerned about the truth when your team is denying the admitted and the obvious?
    Of course the daddy confession you can't show us

    Pathological liars
    You must have the wrong transcript.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,886 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Look at the shill right on time

    Hondo wouldn't know the truth if it curb stomped him to death

    Why pretend you’re concerned about the truth when your team is denying the admitted and the obvious?
    Of course the daddy confession you can't show us

    Pathological liars
    You must have the wrong transcript.
    No.

    Let's see daddy's confession. You can do it.
  • ramenduck
    ramenduck Member Posts: 734

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,076
    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    Wouldn't it just be easier to toss Crazy Joe and Hunter's carcass on the BBQ to fry if it means getting Trump too?

  • ramenduck
    ramenduck Member Posts: 734

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    Wouldn't it just be easier to toss Crazy Joe and Hunter's carcass on the BBQ to fry if it means getting Trump too?

    I got no quibble with that.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,886 Founders Club
    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    That is what the democrats are screaming about. Its all over the news. Trump's crime since there is no quid pro quo on the call is the mere act of investigating Joe

    Since you jumped in I lumped you in
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,076
    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    Wouldn't it just be easier to toss Crazy Joe and Hunter's carcass on the BBQ to fry if it means getting Trump too?

    I got no quibble with that.


    I'll give you some joobs as a sign on good faith to enter into discussion on who else needs to get tossed on the BBQ.


  • ramenduck
    ramenduck Member Posts: 734

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    Wouldn't it just be easier to toss Crazy Joe and Hunter's carcass on the BBQ to fry if it means getting Trump too?

    I got no quibble with that.


    I'll give you some joobs as a sign on good faith to enter into discussion on who else needs to get tossed on the BBQ.


    You have a gift for bargaining.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,076
    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    Wouldn't it just be easier to toss Crazy Joe and Hunter's carcass on the BBQ to fry if it means getting Trump too?

    I got no quibble with that.


    I'll give you some joobs as a sign on good faith to enter into discussion on who else needs to get tossed on the BBQ.


    You have a gift for bargaining quid pro quo.
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,787 Swaye's Wigwam

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    Wouldn't it just be easier to toss Crazy Joe and Hunter's carcass on the BBQ to fry if it means getting Trump too?

    I got no quibble with that.


    I'll give you some joobs as a sign on good faith to enter into discussion on who else needs to get tossed on the BBQ.


    I did notice you gave more than just Joobs - but that is OK.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,886 Founders Club
    The fact that the democrats won't throw Joe over when the smart money says he is toast anyway speaks volumes for the state of the party

    The party that clung to Hillary the same way

    Instead of clamoring for Trump voters to jump ship the democrats would be better served as always to run a great candidate that can beat him

    They got the House back by promising not to waste 2 years on Trump Derangement but they just can't help it

    Healthcare infrastructure etc go wanting while idiots like CD applaud since Trump might get some credit.

    Meanwhile the economy and personal income roll along and the democrats will once again be left standing at the alter wondering why Trump is still fucking the playmates
  • Postal91
    Postal91 Member Posts: 1,895

    Look at the shill right on time

    Hondo wouldn't know the truth if it curb stomped him to death

    He'd probably ask what its pro-nouns are
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    The fact that the democrats won't throw Joe over when the smart money says he is toast anyway speaks volumes for the state of the party

    The party that clung to Hillary the same way

    Instead of clamoring for Trump voters to jump ship the democrats would be better served as always to run a great candidate that can beat him

    They got the House back by promising not to waste 2 years on Trump Derangement but they just can't help it

    Healthcare infrastructure etc go wanting while idiots like CD applaud since Trump might get some credit.

    Meanwhile the economy and personal income roll along and the democrats will once again be left standing at the alter wondering why Trump is still fucking the playmates

    Maybe the GOP can nominate someone halfway competent next time and then there would be the opportunity for legislation on healthcare, immigration and infrastructure. If that’s important to you. Under current circumstances, there’s absolutely no chance ever.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,076
    LebamDawg said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    Wouldn't it just be easier to toss Crazy Joe and Hunter's carcass on the BBQ to fry if it means getting Trump too?

    I got no quibble with that.


    I'll give you some joobs as a sign on good faith to enter into discussion on who else needs to get tossed on the BBQ.


    I did notice you gave more than just Joobs - but that is OK.
    Let he who has not photo-bombed in a Speedo cast the first stone.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    Wouldn't it just be easier to toss Crazy Joe and Hunter's carcass on the BBQ to fry if it means getting Trump too?

    They’d be on the BBQ if they’d admitted half of what Daddy’s already admitted.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,886 Founders Club

    The fact that the democrats won't throw Joe over when the smart money says he is toast anyway speaks volumes for the state of the party

    The party that clung to Hillary the same way

    Instead of clamoring for Trump voters to jump ship the democrats would be better served as always to run a great candidate that can beat him

    They got the House back by promising not to waste 2 years on Trump Derangement but they just can't help it

    Healthcare infrastructure etc go wanting while idiots like CD applaud since Trump might get some credit.

    Meanwhile the economy and personal income roll along and the democrats will once again be left standing at the alter wondering why Trump is still fucking the playmates

    Maybe the GOP can nominate someone halfway competent next time and then there would be the opportunity for legislation on healthcare, immigration and infrastructure. If that’s important to you. Under current circumstances, there’s absolutely no chance ever.
    but but but but but but but
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,886 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    Wouldn't it just be easier to toss Crazy Joe and Hunter's carcass on the BBQ to fry if it means getting Trump too?

    They’d be on the BBQ if they’d admitted half of what Daddy’s already admitted.
    Link?
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,010 Standard Supporter

    The fact that the democrats won't throw Joe over when the smart money says he is toast anyway speaks volumes for the state of the party

    The party that clung to Hillary the same way

    Instead of clamoring for Trump voters to jump ship the democrats would be better served as always to run a great candidate that can beat him

    They got the House back by promising not to waste 2 years on Trump Derangement but they just can't help it

    Healthcare infrastructure etc go wanting while idiots like CD applaud since Trump might get some credit.

    Meanwhile the economy and personal income roll along and the democrats will once again be left standing at the alter wondering why Trump is still fucking the playmates

    Maybe the GOP can nominate someone halfway competent next time and then there would be the opportunity for legislation on healthcare, immigration and infrastructure. If that’s important to you. Under current circumstances, there’s absolutely no chance ever.
    Ha ha ha.......I guess you haven't looked at the complete socialist losers your side has paraded up to the debates. Good God man you are an idiot.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    The fact that the democrats won't throw Joe over when the smart money says he is toast anyway speaks volumes for the state of the party

    The party that clung to Hillary the same way

    Instead of clamoring for Trump voters to jump ship the democrats would be better served as always to run a great candidate that can beat him

    They got the House back by promising not to waste 2 years on Trump Derangement but they just can't help it

    Healthcare infrastructure etc go wanting while idiots like CD applaud since Trump might get some credit.

    Meanwhile the economy and personal income roll along and the democrats will once again be left standing at the alter wondering why Trump is still fucking the playmates

    Maybe the GOP can nominate someone halfway competent next time and then there would be the opportunity for legislation on healthcare, immigration and infrastructure. If that’s important to you. Under current circumstances, there’s absolutely no chance ever.
    Ha ha ha.......I guess you haven't looked at the complete socialist losers your side has paraded up to the debates. Good God man you are an idiot.
    What’s my side? What does that have to do with trump’s incompetence and failure?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,764 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    Wouldn't it just be easier to toss Crazy Joe and Hunter's carcass on the BBQ to fry if it means getting Trump too?

    They’d be on the BBQ if they’d admitted half of what Daddy’s already admitted.
    "Fire him or no money" sounds definitive.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    Wouldn't it just be easier to toss Crazy Joe and Hunter's carcass on the BBQ to fry if it means getting Trump too?

    They’d be on the BBQ if they’d admitted half of what Daddy’s already admitted.
    "Fire him or no money" sounds definitive.
    That's different because Joe was just bragging.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    ramenduck said:

    GDS said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    If being a political opponent gives you immunity for foreign corruption why have the democrats been investigating their political opponent for three years? An investigation that required foreign help to get of the ground by the way

    There's an alternate universe where I posted those things and in which you have a killer point.
    I quoted your post

    I do have a killer point

    Which can't be refuted
    You did quote my post, there being a quote button and all.

    Where did I post that being a political opponent gives you immunity from foreign corruption?

    And I keep hearing that those FISA documents will be declassified any day now.
    Wouldn't it just be easier to toss Crazy Joe and Hunter's carcass on the BBQ to fry if it means getting Trump too?

    They’d be on the BBQ if they’d admitted half of what Daddy’s already admitted.
    "Fire him or no money" sounds definitive.
    That was the US position. True.