Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

More damaging leaks

RaceBannon
RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,084 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
President Trump and his allies in Congress pushed back against damaging revelations from diplomat Bill Taylor’s Tuesday testimony – in which the Ukraine envoy said the administration linked U.S. military aid to a call for politically related investigations in Kiev – saying the witness also acknowledged under questioning that Ukraine was initially in the dark on the aid holdup.

Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, asserted that this counters claims of a “quid pro quo.”

“At the end of the day, this was about quid pro quo and whether or not the Ukrainians were aware that military aid was being withheld and on that most important issue. Neither this witness or any other witness has provided any evidence that there was a quid pro quo, or any evidence that the Ukrainians were aware that military aid was being withheld on July 25,” Ratcliffe said on “The Story” Tuesday night, claiming that absent testimony speaking to that point, “a quid pro quo is legally impossible.”

He was referring to the now-famous phone call on July 25 between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, during which Trump pressed for investigations into 2016 election interference and Biden family dealings in the country, specifically Hunter Biden's role on the board of natural gas firm Burisma Holdings.

A source familiar with the testimony confirmed to Fox News that during questioning on Capitol Hill Tuesday, Taylor said the Ukrainians did not know at the time of the call about the hold on U.S. military aid.

“The mainstream media reporting that he provided evidence of a quid pro quo involving military aid is false — I questioned him directly on that,” Ratcliffe said Tuesday. “I can’t tell you what he said … but I can tell you what he didn’t say — neither he nor any other witness has provided testimony that the Ukrainians were aware that military aid was being withheld.”

He added: “You can’t have a quid pro quo with no quo.”

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,084 Founders Club
    House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said a fellow Republican lawmaker deconstructed a key part of the latest Trump impeachment inquiry witness testimony in Tuesday's closed-door session.

    "In 90 seconds, we had John Ratcliffe destroy [acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill] Taylor's whole argument," McCarthy said.

    The questioning by Ratcliffe, a Texas Republican and member of both the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees, was an important moment in the hearing, McCarthy claimed.

    "We can't really talk about it," he said.

    Ratcliffe appeared on Fox News after the testimony and said there were new details brought to light, but said nothing "worthy of impeachment."

    McCarthy added House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is not allowing lawmakers to speak too specifically about the proceedings, in an interview Tuesday on "The Ingraham Angle."

    "Adam Schiff won't let us talk about what happened," he said regarding U.S. diplomat to Ukraine Bill Taylor's closed-door hearing on Capitol Hill. "There is no quid pro quo."

    The California lawmaker also claimed the impeachment inquiry process continues to be based largely on testimony from those without first-hand knowledge of the Trump-Ukraine situation.



    "The one thing that you find out in this process is all this information is just like that whistleblower... everything is second-, third-, and fourth-hand information," he said.

    He criticized Schiff for how he is conducting the proceedings, claiming the relevant Republican lawmakers are unable to view information from the hearings unless they are accompanied by the chairman's staff members.

    "What they are doing [is] they are changing every rule we ever had," he said.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Cool story bro.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,084 Founders Club
    Look at the shill right on time

    Hondo wouldn't know the truth if it curb stomped him to death
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    No one cares
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,084 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    No one cares

    Agree

    But my spam is better than your spam
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,105
    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,105
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    Go ahead - explain it.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,084 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    Tell us more oh ye of the complex mind
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,105
    edited October 2019
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    Tell us more oh ye of the complex mind
    You just won't understand, @RaceBannon


    This is normal CD, H and Hondo. APAG gave up running that. Actually APAG just gave up.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    Go ahead - explain it.

    We have discussed it many many times. But Bidens scenario, other countries wanted him removed. Biden is a cocky bastard and was bragging about what he did that he really didn't have much influence over.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,084 Founders Club
    Its a lie to say other countries wanted the guy removed. We proved that last week. It was Obama and Biden

    Biden threatened to withhold US aid if the Ukes didn't fire the guy looking into his corrupt son

    Trump did not threaten to withhold aid but wants the Ukes and other countries to look into DNC corruption. Barr was in Italy and Australia offered to help

    Biden brags on tape that he did it. The Trump transcript shows he did not and the alleged target of the threat in the Ukraine denies it as well


    There you go big brains
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,084 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...
    Almost

    Just switch Biden and Trump and you have it

    Typical leftist. Accuse others of what you did
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    Its a lie to say other countries wanted the guy removed. We proved that last week. It was Obama and Biden

    Biden threatened to withhold US aid if the Ukes didn't fire the guy looking into his corrupt son

    Trump did not threaten to withhold aid but wants the Ukes and other countries to look into DNC corruption. Barr was in Italy and Australia offered to help

    Biden brags on tape that he did it. The Trump transcript shows he did not and the alleged target of the threat in the Ukraine denies it as well


    There you go big brains

    And Race goes full Fox news conspiracy theory.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,084 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Its a lie to say other countries wanted the guy removed. We proved that last week. It was Obama and Biden

    Biden threatened to withhold US aid if the Ukes didn't fire the guy looking into his corrupt son

    Trump did not threaten to withhold aid but wants the Ukes and other countries to look into DNC corruption. Barr was in Italy and Australia offered to help

    Biden brags on tape that he did it. The Trump transcript shows he did not and the alleged target of the threat in the Ukraine denies it as well


    There you go big brains

    And Race goes nailed it based on facts
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,105
    edited October 2019
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    Go ahead - explain it.

    We have discussed it many many times. But Bidens scenario, other countries wanted him removed. Biden is a cocky bastard and was bragging about what he did that he really didn't have much influence over.
    Did Biden or did Biden not say that loan guarantees were withheld and indicated he was an authorized agent acting on the behalf of the President of the United State of America?

    FF to 0:34 if you need help.



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,105
    GDS said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    RaceBannon said:

    Its a lie to say other countries wanted the guy removed. We proved that last week. It was Obama and Biden

    Biden threatened to withhold US aid if the Ukes didn't fire the guy looking into his corrupt son

    Trump did not threaten to withhold aid but wants the Ukes and other countries to look into DNC corruption. Barr was in Italy and Australia offered to help

    Biden brags on tape that he did it. The Trump transcript shows he did not and the alleged target of the threat in the Ukraine denies it as well


    There you go big brains

    Hence why there were contemporaneous quotes from IMF leaders pushing for his removal. The idea that the parliament voted overwhelmingly 4 months after Biden visited because of Biden is fucktarded even for massive Trump kneepaders like you Race. It couldn’t have been because of the hordes of diamonds and cash found in prosecutors homes from all the bribes they were taking or their failure to persecute corruption on a massive scale.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    RaceBannon said:

    GDS said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...
    Almost

    Just switch Biden and Trump and you have it

    Typical leftist. Accuse others of what you did

    Lying again. Sad.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ramenduck
    ramenduck Member Posts: 734
    edited October 2019
    PurpleThrobber said:

    GDS said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    The 19 candidates are not created equal. Realistically, Biden is one of about 4 to take out.

    It also isn't difficult to reason that Biden was the highest polling candidate by a substantial margin, and largely thought as the primary threat to beat him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,826 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Its a lie to say other countries wanted the guy removed. We proved that last week. It was Obama and Biden

    Biden threatened to withhold US aid if the Ukes didn't fire the guy looking into his corrupt son

    Trump did not threaten to withhold aid but wants the Ukes and other countries to look into DNC corruption. Barr was in Italy and Australia offered to help

    Biden brags on tape that he did it. The Trump transcript shows he did not and the alleged target of the threat in the Ukraine denies it as well


    There you go big brains

    Hence why there were contemporaneous quotes from IMF leaders pushing for his removal. The idea that the parliament voted overwhelmingly 4 months after Biden visited because of Biden is fucktarded even for massive Trump kneepaders like you Race. It couldn’t have been because of the hordes of diamonds and cash found in prosecutors homes from all the bribes they were taking or their failure to persecute corruption on a massive scale.
    Were the IMF leaders kids collecting their payoffs too?

    Asking for a friend.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    PurpleThrobber said:

    GDS said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Biden is guilty of a quid pro quo to further US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian ant-corruption interests. Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo to further his own political interests...which in the mind of trumptards is the same FUCKING thing...

    There are, at last count, 19 candidates running for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. NINETEEN!

    And you're saying Trump is smart enough to know that out of NINETEEN candidates, Biden is the one to take out?

    You guys are always saying how dumb Trump is. And now he is smart enough to handicap a 19 candidate field and zero in on Biden?!?!

    Crazy Joe Biden?

    Wow.



    Over the summer was Biden leading both the Democratic field and Trump in head to head polls? And it wasn’t even close. In either.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,084 Founders Club
    The problem remains that Biden is on tape and Trump released the transcript

    All of this bullshit goes back to that

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,792 Swaye's Wigwam
    RaceBannon said:

    The problem remains that Biden is on tape and Trump released the transcript

    All of this bullshit goes back to that

    Race Race Race - you are missing the major points here - the transcript is from Trump, thus it is not truthful. The video of Biden boasting about it is braggadocio on Biden's part and it is not truthful of what really went down.


    CD, Hondo, GDS, APAG - did I get that correct?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    Go ahead - explain it.

    We have discussed it many many times. But Bidens scenario, other countries wanted him removed. Biden is a cocky bastard and was bragging about what he did that he really didn't have much influence over.
    Did Biden or did Biden not say that loan guarantees were withheld and indicated he was an authorized agent acting on the behalf of the President of the United State of America?

    FF to 0:34 if you need help.



    I know exactly what Biden said and alluded to it in my comment. And explained exactly why is different. Stick to posting hot chicks. I expect people like Race and Daboner to carry water for Trump, you are better than that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,105
    edited October 2019
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    Go ahead - explain it.

    We have discussed it many many times. But Bidens scenario, other countries wanted him removed. Biden is a cocky bastard and was bragging about what he did that he really didn't have much influence over.
    Did Biden or did Biden not say that loan guarantees were withheld and indicated he was an authorized agent acting on the behalf of the President of the United State of America?

    FF to 0:34 if you need help.



    I know exactly what Biden said and alluded to it in my comment. And explained exactly why is different. Stick to posting hot chicks. I expect people like Race and Daboner to carry water for Trump, you are better than that.
    On numerous occasions I have stated, I give no fucks about Trump. But he's the lesser of two evils relative to what the 'liberals' are vomiting out there.

    And, hold independently the thought that IS possible to give no fucks about Trump either direction (Hi there TDS sufferers) and see that the Bidens and the Clintons and very likely the Obamas are slimy as fuck -except their daughters aren't old enough to drink from the silver trough yet.

    If you're going after Trump, you go after Biden simultaneously. Instead it's business as usual and fuck all gets done.

    Wake up, sheeple.




    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    Go ahead - explain it.

    We have discussed it many many times. But Bidens scenario, other countries wanted him removed. Biden is a cocky bastard and was bragging about what he did that he really didn't have much influence over.
    Did Biden or did Biden not say that loan guarantees were withheld and indicated he was an authorized agent acting on the behalf of the President of the United State of America?

    FF to 0:34 if you need help.



    I know exactly what Biden said and alluded to it in my comment. And explained exactly why is different. Stick to posting hot chicks. I expect people like Race and Daboner to carry water for Trump, you are better than that.
    On numerous occasions I have stated, I give no fucks about Trump. But he's the lesser of two evils relative to what the 'liberals' are vomiting out there.

    And, hold independently the thought that is IS possible to give no fucks about Trump either direction (Hi there TDS sufferers) and see that the Bidens and the Clintons and very likely the Obamas are slimy as fuck -except their daughters aren't old enough to drink from the silver trough yet.

    If you're going after Trump, you go after Biden simultaneously. Instead it's business as usual and fuck all gets done.

    Wake up, sheeple.




    Biden is just corrupt as all of them. I'm just saying that the situations are completely different on Ukraine. Just like I say Hunter used his dad's influence for an overpaid board position, it's not illegal but probably should be.

    If you looked at the Ukraine scenarios, you'd see how they are different.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,105
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    Go ahead - explain it.

    We have discussed it many many times. But Bidens scenario, other countries wanted him removed. Biden is a cocky bastard and was bragging about what he did that he really didn't have much influence over.
    Did Biden or did Biden not say that loan guarantees were withheld and indicated he was an authorized agent acting on the behalf of the President of the United State of America?

    FF to 0:34 if you need help.



    I know exactly what Biden said and alluded to it in my comment. And explained exactly why is different. Stick to posting hot chicks. I expect people like Race and Daboner to carry water for Trump, you are better than that.
    On numerous occasions I have stated, I give no fucks about Trump. But he's the lesser of two evils relative to what the 'liberals' are vomiting out there.

    And, hold independently the thought that is IS possible to give no fucks about Trump either direction (Hi there TDS sufferers) and see that the Bidens and the Clintons and very likely the Obamas are slimy as fuck -except their daughters aren't old enough to drink from the silver trough yet.

    If you're going after Trump, you go after Biden simultaneously. Instead it's business as usual and fuck all gets done.

    Wake up, sheeple.




    Biden is just corrupt as all of them. I'm just saying that the situations are completely different on Ukraine. Just like I say Hunter used his dad's influence for an overpaid board position, it's not illegal but probably should be.

    If you looked at the Ukraine scenarios, you'd see how they are different.
    You should have stopped at your first sentence.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Of course it was quid pro quo. Life is quid pro quo. Don't let the progressives co opt that word too.

    Again, if Trump is 'quid pro quo' for demanding assistance in investigation, Biden is just as guilty of 'quid pro quo' on the other side demanding removal of the investigator.

    It's the same FUCKING thing. Just opposite sides of the same quid.

    Only a simple mind thinks they are the same thing. It's almost like there are facts and circumstances that are different in each scenario.
    Go ahead - explain it.

    We have discussed it many many times. But Bidens scenario, other countries wanted him removed. Biden is a cocky bastard and was bragging about what he did that he really didn't have much influence over.
    Did Biden or did Biden not say that loan guarantees were withheld and indicated he was an authorized agent acting on the behalf of the President of the United State of America?

    FF to 0:34 if you need help.



    I know exactly what Biden said and alluded to it in my comment. And explained exactly why is different. Stick to posting hot chicks. I expect people like Race and Daboner to carry water for Trump, you are better than that.
    On numerous occasions I have stated, I give no fucks about Trump. But he's the lesser of two evils relative to what the 'liberals' are vomiting out there.

    And, hold independently the thought that is IS possible to give no fucks about Trump either direction (Hi there TDS sufferers) and see that the Bidens and the Clintons and very likely the Obamas are slimy as fuck -except their daughters aren't old enough to drink from the silver trough yet.

    If you're going after Trump, you go after Biden simultaneously. Instead it's business as usual and fuck all gets done.

    Wake up, sheeple.




    Biden is just corrupt as all of them. I'm just saying that the situations are completely different on Ukraine. Just like I say Hunter used his dad's influence for an overpaid board position, it's not illegal but probably should be.

    If you looked at the Ukraine scenarios, you'd see how they are different.
    Oh now it's an "overpaid" board position. Just last week you lying Kunt you were dismissing the amount of money he was paid to sit on the board.

    What's it like being a lying piece of shit with no integrity Hondo?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter