Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

My theory on Chris Peterman

DerekJohnson
DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,485 Founders Club
I said this a couple years ago but I'll repeat it. For the record, this is just me reading the tea leaves, it may not be accurate.

My theory: Petersen burned out in Boise and lost his love of the game. He hates the media, hates being second guessed and hates dealing with bullshit fans. When the UW job opened up he had a long talk with his wife about how it might reinvigorate him.

He gets to UW and finds the pressure all the more greater. The love still isn't there. But he does enough things well to maintain a Mike Bellotti level of success on the field.

When Jimmy Lake began receiving accolades, Pete didn't want to lose him. So Pete, Lake and Cohen had a private meeting and worked out a deal where Pete coaches X number of years before handing the reins over to Jimmy.
«13

Comments

  • animate
    animate Member Posts: 4,245
    Where did you steal this one from Derek!?

    Yah, I've always thought that lake was "coach in waiting" without the official title.

    That's also why Harris is being groomed to take over db's when lake is head coach.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,485 Founders Club
    animate said:

    Where did you steal this one from Derek!?

    Yah, I've always thought that lake was "coach in waiting" without the official title.

    That's also why Harris is being groomed to take over db's when lake is head coach.

    I didn't steal it from anywhere.
  • BeerThirty
    BeerThirty Member Posts: 2,465

    I really hope Eason sticks around, because I believe next year's UW squad will be great.

    Not. Gonna. Happen.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165

    I just think UW is young in areas we can't make up for and where we're not young, we're weak in areas we can't make up for. I think it's just unique to particular this squad... and it was inevitable because there's nothing really special about the upperclassmen on this current team.

    Manu, Wellington, Fuller, Opera, Bronson, Potoa'e can't leave the program soon enough. Typically you expect seniors to be the stars and leaders of a ball club... none of these guys have stepped up in the way we needed the Dawgs to be successful.

    Down years happen for teams that can't recruit like Alabama, LSU, Ohio St, Oklahoma, Clemson. It's a bummer that guys like Wellington and Manu have to start, but we're not the programs listed above.

    I really hope Eason sticks around, because I believe next year's UW squad will be great.

    I don't think this year is a sign of things to come... it's just a down year after a great run of football for the program.

    Your constant trashing off Potoae and Bronson is way off the mark, but otherwise yeah, you're pretty spot on here.
  • BeerThirty
    BeerThirty Member Posts: 2,465
    I don't get that either. Those two have been solid players for us.
  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,041 Standard Supporter
    Yeah, I don’t think Pete has lost his love of the game. Look at the photos of him after winning the PAC 12 title game and handing out roses to the band. That’s a look of pure joy if I’ve ever seen one.

    If I was playing armchair psychologist, I just think he’s a perfectionist that’s maybe having a difficult time adjusting to situations that aren’t going his way.
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Dereks theory and why we? suck this year are 2 separate ideas.

    But are they?
  • DoogWhisperer
    DoogWhisperer Member Posts: 1,035

    I just think UW is young in areas we can't make up for and where we're not young, we're weak in areas we can't make up for. I think it's just unique to particular this squad... and it was inevitable because there's nothing really special about the upperclassmen on this current team.

    Manu, Wellington, Fuller, Opera, Bronson, Potoa'e can't leave the program soon enough. Typically you expect seniors to be the stars and leaders of a ball club... none of these guys have stepped up in the way we needed the Dawgs to be successful.

    Down years happen for teams that can't recruit like Alabama, LSU, Ohio St, Oklahoma, Clemson. It's a bummer that guys like Wellington and Manu have to start, but we're not the programs listed above.

    I really hope Eason sticks around, because I believe next year's UW squad will be great.

    I don't think this year is a sign of things to come... it's just a down year after a great run of football for the program.


  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,316 Founders Club
    FirePete said:

    Dereks theory and why we? suck this year are 2 separate ideas.

    But are they?
    Yes.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,066

    I said this a couple years ago but I'll repeat it. For the record, this is just me reading the tea leaves, it may not be accurate.

    My theory: Petersen burned out in Boise and lost his love of the game. He hates the media, hates being second guessed and hates dealing with bullshit fans. When the UW job opened up he had a long talk with his wife about how it might reinvigorate him.

    He gets to UW and finds the pressure all the more greater. The love still isn't there. But he does enough things well to maintain a Mike Bellotti level of success on the field.

    When Jimmy Lake began receiving accolades, Pete didn't want to lose him. So Pete, Lake and Cohen had a private meeting and worked out a deal where Pete coaches X number of years before handing the reins over to Jimmy.

    You? need to get you one of these Stalin:


  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,081 Founders Club
    We already had our tuff o line coach tied to a legend head coach. Worked out great too


  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    I think people are overthinking this. Pete is having a shit year, that’s all it really is. He has done some good things at UW so far but his results in big games has been underwhelming. The bar has been raised as of recent times and with that comes a higher demand of success, which right now it seems he is being complacent with.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,066

    We already had our tuff o line coach tied to a legend head coach. Worked out great too


    Mario may have moobs, but Gilby was a fat disgusting fuck. I'd see that guy at picture and think of that line from Niedermeyer in Animal House: "You're a God Damned Disgrace!" I thought, how the fuck is the team going to have any discipline when they see you eating 18 meals a day?"

    Anyway, I never saw Gilbertson make that kind of tuff guy face. Just wasn't as tuff I guess.
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    FirePete said:

    What is your theory on who killed Kennedy Scalia?

  • huskyhooligan
    huskyhooligan Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,956 Swaye's Wigwam
    I still beat for Coach Pete. Both of them. winky winky

    I just think Pete wasn't ready for the transition to a bigger market and had regrets for what he left behind at Boise. Friends, smaller market, etc. That being said I agree he hates being second guessed by armchair quarterbacks, and severely morbidly obese 'reporters' who don't Broonc out like the reporters in Boise would (at least I think they do). I feel like Pete appreciates it more now than even a couple years ago. I still don't know anyone who has personally met him, but I'm poor, and none of my daddies are that rich. I'd also venture that based on the stories that came out re Sark (Duchess, Joey's, Patron) that there was probably a strong push from the AD to not be as visible. Let's not forget it wasn't completely on field stuff that got Lambo fired. Sadly off field stuff probably weighs more heavily here than on field, or at least a happy balance doesn't seem to have been established.
  • huskyhooligan
    huskyhooligan Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,956 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited October 2019

    I still beat for Coach Pete. Both of them. winky winky

    I just think Pete wasn't ready for the transition to a bigger market and had regrets for what he left behind at Boise. Friends, smaller market, etc. That being said I agree he hates being second guessed by armchair quarterbacks, and severely morbidly obese 'reporters' who don't Broonc out like the reporters in Boise would (at least I think they do). I feel like Pete appreciates it more now than even a couple years ago. I still don't know anyone who has personally met him, but I'm poor, and none of my daddies are that rich. I'd also venture that based on the stories that came out re Sark (Duchess, Joey's, Patron) that there was probably a strong push from the AD to not be as visible. Let's not forget it wasn't completely on field stuff that got Lambo fired. Sadly off field stuff probably weighs more heavily here than on field, or at least a happy balance doesn't seem to have been established.

    When you win the conference and beat a bunch of P5 teams like Pete did, reporters are going to bow down.

    NOGAF anymore about that at UW and when you’re program is regressing and you are doing stupid shit, you get called out. The Seattle media goes light on him.
    I'll give CP & UW credit for basically browbeating the media into towing the line.
  • JustWinNow
    JustWinNow Member Posts: 357
    I hope you are right and I am wrong. Because to me a loser is a loser.
  • picalogestabo
    picalogestabo Member Posts: 651
    Derek's theory checks out. I heard rumblings from a source that would know after the Rose Bowl that Pete is ready to get out of coaching. Was told that he had a couple of years left and Lake would move into the HC role as part of the succession plan developed by Jen. On Saturday after the loss I heard that it might happen sooner. Was told Pete's really burnt out, disappointed he can't win the big one and he is unwilling to make changes to the staff when he knows he's done.