If liberals were really serious about doing something about poverty...
Comments
-
Guess how much your statistics don’t refute a fucking word I said.TheKobeStopper said:Here comes old man Race, lumbering into the ring.
Most black children live with their father.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr071.pdf
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2015/6/21/8820537/black-fathers-day
I’m not taking Bob or his statistics seriously because I’ve linked this study before. And guess how much Damone cared that what he was saying was a complete lie? About as much as Bob will when he finds out. -
See?SFGbob said:
Guess how much your statistics don’t refute a fucking word I said.TheKobeStopper said:Here comes old man Race, lumbering into the ring.
Most black children live with their father.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr071.pdf
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2015/6/21/8820537/black-fathers-day
I’m not taking Bob or his statistics seriously because I’ve linked this study before. And guess how much Damone cared that what he was saying was a complete lie? About as much as Bob will when he finds out. -
This post has nothing to do with race.SFGbob said:they'd do something to address these facts:
When Moynihan wrote in 1965 on the coming destruction of the Black family, the out-of-wedlock birth rate was 25% among Blacks. In 1991, 68% of Black children were born outside of marriage. In 2011, 72% of Black babies were born to unmarried mothers.
Today those numbers are about 77% for blacks and 49% for Hispanics.
This is the real driver of poverty and pretty much every other social ill you can think of, in America today.
Father Time remains undefeated. -
Are the statistics real or not?TheKobeStopper said:
This post has nothing to do with race.SFGbob said:they'd do something to address these facts:
When Moynihan wrote in 1965 on the coming destruction of the Black family, the out-of-wedlock birth rate was 25% among Blacks. In 1991, 68% of Black children were born outside of marriage. In 2011, 72% of Black babies were born to unmarried mothers.
Today those numbers are about 77% for blacks and 49% for Hispanics.
This is the real driver of poverty and pretty much every other social ill you can think of, in America today.
Father Time remains undefeated. -
This.dnc said:I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.
Just my two cents here. -
Whether they are real or not the are definitely racist.RaceBannon said:
Are the statistics real or not?TheKobeStopper said:
This post has nothing to do with race.SFGbob said:they'd do something to address these facts:
When Moynihan wrote in 1965 on the coming destruction of the Black family, the out-of-wedlock birth rate was 25% among Blacks. In 1991, 68% of Black children were born outside of marriage. In 2011, 72% of Black babies were born to unmarried mothers.
Today those numbers are about 77% for blacks and 49% for Hispanics.
This is the real driver of poverty and pretty much every other social ill you can think of, in America today.
Father Time remains undefeated. -
Who said they weren’t real?RaceBannon said:
Are the statistics real or not?TheKobeStopper said:
This post has nothing to do with race.SFGbob said:they'd do something to address these facts:
When Moynihan wrote in 1965 on the coming destruction of the Black family, the out-of-wedlock birth rate was 25% among Blacks. In 1991, 68% of Black children were born outside of marriage. In 2011, 72% of Black babies were born to unmarried mothers.
Today those numbers are about 77% for blacks and 49% for Hispanics.
This is the real driver of poverty and pretty much every other social ill you can think of, in America today.
Father Time remains undefeated. -
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?TheKobeStopper said:
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.greenblood said:
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG? -
Progressive Sacrilege!!!DerekJohnson said:
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?TheKobeStopper said:
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.greenblood said:
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG? -
APAG wants African-Americans to continue to be born out-of-wedlock and struggle in poverty, just so he can defend their rights and feel self-righteous about himself.dnc said:I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.
Just my two cents here. -
Nailed it.DerekJohnson said:
APAG wants African-Americans to continue to be born out-of-wedlock and struggle in poverty, just so he can defend their rights and feel self-righteous about himself.dnc said:I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.
Just my two cents here.
SJW FTW -
ISAFNRCDerekJohnson said:
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?TheKobeStopper said:
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.greenblood said:
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG? -
Case closedTheKobeStopper said:
Who said they weren’t real?RaceBannon said:
Are the statistics real or not?TheKobeStopper said:
This post has nothing to do with race.SFGbob said:they'd do something to address these facts:
When Moynihan wrote in 1965 on the coming destruction of the Black family, the out-of-wedlock birth rate was 25% among Blacks. In 1991, 68% of Black children were born outside of marriage. In 2011, 72% of Black babies were born to unmarried mothers.
Today those numbers are about 77% for blacks and 49% for Hispanics.
This is the real driver of poverty and pretty much every other social ill you can think of, in America today.
Father Time remains undefeated. -
All you need to do is look at the family status of every person who drops out of high school, ends up in prison, abuses drugs, grows up living in poverty and you'll find that the majority of every person in any of those categories were born out of wedlock and or live in a single parent household.DerekJohnson said:
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?TheKobeStopper said:
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.greenblood said:
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
Kids being born out of wedlock is the biggest driver of nearly all social pathologies you can think of. -
Taboo to mention that. What would the libs do without their pawns? They need all those fatherless homes to hang onto their power.SFGbob said:
All you need to do is look at the family status of every person who drops out of high school, ends up in prison, abuses drugs, grows up living in poverty and you'll find that the majority of every person in any of those categories were born out of wedlock and or live in a single parent household.DerekJohnson said:
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?TheKobeStopper said:
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.greenblood said:
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
Kids being born out of wedlock is the biggest driver of nearly all social pathologies you can think of. -
Well you can see what happens right here when you do talk about it. Leftists will scream racism. Btw, do you think any of these white liberals encourage any of their children to have kids out of wedlock? Of course not.TurdBomber said:
Taboo to mention that. What would the libs do without their pawns? They need all those fatherless homes to hang onto their power.SFGbob said:
All you need to do is look at the family status of every person who drops out of high school, ends up in prison, abuses drugs, grows up living in poverty and you'll find that the majority of every person in any of those categories were born out of wedlock and or live in a single parent household.DerekJohnson said:
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?TheKobeStopper said:
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.greenblood said:
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
Kids being born out of wedlock is the biggest driver of nearly all social pathologies you can think of. -
No, I do not think that.DerekJohnson said:
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?TheKobeStopper said:
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.greenblood said:
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG? -
See?SFGbob said:
All you need to do is look at the family status of every person who drops out of high school, ends up in prison, abuses drugs, grows up living in poverty and you'll find that the majority of every person in any of those categories were born out of wedlock and or live in a single parent household.DerekJohnson said:
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?TheKobeStopper said:
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.greenblood said:
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
Kids being born out of wedlock is the biggest driver of nearly all social pathologies you can think of. -
TheKobeStopper said:
No, I do not think that.DerekJohnson said:
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?TheKobeStopper said:
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.greenblood said:
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
Incarceration Rates
"Young men who grow up in homes without fathers are twice as likely to end up in jail as those who come from traditional two-parent families...those boys whose fathers were absent from the household had double the odds of being incarcerated -- even when other factors such as race, income, parent education and urban residence were held constant." (Harper C, McLanahan SS. Cited in Father Absence and Youth Incarceration. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2004.)
But APAG doesn't think it would be better if there were less kids being raised by a single parent. -
Less kids being raised by a single parent and 95% of all children being born into a mom-dad environment are completely different questions.
-
Oh there he goes with the old rat two step. Now kobe is going to try and angle this loser argument to something that was never even part of the discussion. He lost the argument because he was all FEELINGS upped and facts made him look ridiculous.TheKobeStopper said:Less kids being raised by a single parent and 95% of all children being born into a mom-dad environment are completely different questions.
