Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
If liberals were really serious about doing something about poverty...
Comments
-
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG? -
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.greenblood said:
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG? -
Appears APAG is advocating for having sex with those children.TheKobeStopper said:
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.greenblood said:
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG? -
Child that grow up without a father represent
Suicide: 63 percent of youth suicides
Runaways: 90 percent of all homeless and runaway youths
Behavioral Disorders: 85 percent of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders
High School Dropouts: 71 percent of all high school dropouts
Juvenile Detention Rates: 70 percent of juveniles in state-operated institutions
Substance Abuse: 75 percent of adolescent patients in substance abuse centers
Aggression: 75 percent of rapists motivated by displaced anger
To back up that data from 1998, which continues to be cited by researchers, a 2016 report of teenagers placed in juvenile residential facilities shows that 45 percent were living with only one parent at the time. That is a significant difference when compared to 30 percent of teens in two-parent households.
Furthermore, individual studies over the years have noted similar challenges for children with an absent father:
Educational Attainment
Kids living in single-parent homes or in step-families report lower educational expectations on the part of their parents, less parental monitoring of school work, and less overall social supervision than children from intact families. (Astore NM, S. McLanahan S. American Sociological Review, No. 56. 1991)
Achievement
Children from low-income, two-parent families outperform students from high-income, single-parent homes. Almost twice as many high achievers come from two-parent homes as one-parent homes. (One-Parent Families and Their Children. Charles F. Kettering Foundation. 1990).
Drug Use
A study from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services concluded that fatherless children are at a dramatically greater risk of drug and alcohol abuse. (National Center for Health Statistics. Survey on Child Health. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1993.)
Incarceration Rates
"Young men who grow up in homes without fathers are twice as likely to end up in jail as those who come from traditional two-parent families...those boys whose fathers were absent from the household had double the odds of being incarcerated -- even when other factors such as race, income, parent education and urban residence were held constant." (Harper C, McLanahan SS. Cited in Father Absence and Youth Incarceration. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2004.)
-
-
-
-
That's a pretty tall strawman you built yourself. Where did he type that?TheKobeStopper said:
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.greenblood said:
He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.TheKobeStopper said:Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.
Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.
What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html
The last paragraph is quite interesting:
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
You're trying to build his conclusion for him. All he's saying is that birth rates from unmarried minority women has been increasing over the years which has contributed to the high poverty rate with minorities. This fact is hard to refute. So instead of refuting the fact, you build a fucking strawman by creating a conclusion that he's proposing for government forced abortions of minorities, when there wasn't even a conclusion. The idea that you tie that fact into an abortion conclusion, tells me a lot about you.
Because there is no way a possible conclusion could be that poor people continue to be poor because they tend to make stupid decisions. That conclusion can't be true, because it rips apart the victim argument the left has been spewing for years. -
Out of wedlock birth rates for all women have been increasing. The clearest marker to determine if a child will grow up living in poverty is if that child grows up in a single parent household.
But as you can see from the leftists that post here, they don't give a shit about it and they're not even willing to address the issue honestly. -
I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.
Just my two cents here.
