Lol..just 9 short years ago....
Comments
-
not the case. Youd part with your left nut to be a strapping twenty something year old studMikeDamone said:
You would piss yourself to have my life..let alone Harvs.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Damone lost all his money in a ponzi scheme or some shit, let the dude be dour.
-
* warning * thread hijack *
I'd like to strive to be a two sport school. There aren't a shitload, but it's not as hard as the numbers make it out to be if you're a football school since it's easier to build up a basketball program.
Like I said earlier today, if LoRo had some killer recruits coming in, maybe you see what happens. OTOH, he doesn't have the coaching acumen to bring in and develop tough, gritty four year players ala the Gonfaga-mid-major way.
So what do you do? Just wait and hope he lands three or four studs? Or Woody can be proactive and try to do something about it now. Unfortunately guilty white crocheting liberal fags and know-it-all black lesbians with shaved heads would cry racism if he was canned now. -
Wouldn't it be harder to get laid though, going up against a strapping twenty something year old stud with both nuts?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
not the case. Youd part with your left nut to be a strapping twenty something year old studMikeDamone said:
You would piss yourself to have my life..let alone Harvs.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Damone lost all his money in a ponzi scheme or some shit, let the dude be dour.
I'm new to this board and never PM'd Irish, curious as hell about Damone now. Toilet references seem like obvious whooshes and the above quote. I'm going to say my assumption is true that he's a retired business owner or something similar.
-
Yeah? well, 2 years ago we won a Pac-10 CHAMPIONSHIP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
So would you.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
not the case. Youd part with your left nut to be a strapping twenty something year old studMikeDamone said:
You would piss yourself to have my life..let alone Harvs.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Damone lost all his money in a ponzi scheme or some shit, let the dude be dour.
-
WhateverMikeDamone said:
So would you.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
not the case. Youd part with your left nut to be a strapping twenty something year old studMikeDamone said:
You would piss yourself to have my life..let alone Harvs.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Damone lost all his money in a ponzi scheme or some shit, let the dude be dour.
-
Burn!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
WhateverMikeDamone said:
So would you.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
not the case. Youd part with your left nut to be a strapping twenty something year old studMikeDamone said:
You would piss yourself to have my life..let alone Harvs.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Damone lost all his money in a ponzi scheme or some shit, let the dude be dour.
-
The problem is even if Romar has studs, he gets outcoached by all the good coaches. Almost every time UW plays a good team in non conference, we lose. This has happened even when we have had good teams.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:* warning * thread hijack *
I'd like to strive to be a two sport school. There aren't a shitload, but it's not as hard as the numbers make it out to be if you're a football school since it's easier to build up a basketball program.
Like I said earlier today, if LoRo had some killer recruits coming in, maybe you see what happens. OTOH, he doesn't have the coaching acumen to bring in and develop tough, gritty four year players ala the Gonfaga-mid-major way.
So what do you do? Just wait and hope he lands three or four studs? Or Woody can be proactive and try to do something about it now. Unfortunately guilty white crocheting liberal fags and know-it-all black lesbians with shaved heads would cry racism if he was canned now.
-
hey look damone is being grumpy and moaning about something in a HH thread
shocker -
A shitty draw. UW was ranked 7th but a #1 seed and Louisville ranked #4 but a 4 seed.RoadDawg55 said:
You can get excited over a #1 seed AND be pissed at the loss to Louisville. Abundance. BTW, they lost to a Louisville team that went 33-5 and made the Final Four. It's not like they lost to a shitty mid major.MikeDamone said:
It only would have been impressive if they made it to the final for...or even 8..instead it proved they were over rated. But at least the students got to got nuts for a few minutes and feel good about something, even though it was a mirageFire_Marshall_Bill said:It's
A one seed >> rushing the field over wins vs. historic fball also-ransMikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
It was pretty cool and an impressive accomplishment. It would have been way more impressive had they made the Final 4.
That game sucked . UW was the real deal that year(as in top 10 not top 5 though) but easily played their worst game that day.
Wished that team had a sophomore Brockman or even a freshman Hawes.
The guard play was unbelievable. Romar owes a lot to Bender and Slick Rick for setting him up so nicely. -
Those guards were beyond anything we'll ever see at UW again. That team earned a #1 seed (#3 in RPI) with Mike Jensen as its best big man.He_Needs_More_Time said:
A shitty draw. UW was ranked 7th but a #1 seed and Louisville ranked #4 but a 4 seed.RoadDawg55 said:
You can get excited over a #1 seed AND be pissed at the loss to Louisville. Abundance. BTW, they lost to a Louisville team that went 33-5 and made the Final Four. It's not like they lost to a shitty mid major.MikeDamone said:
It only would have been impressive if they made it to the final for...or even 8..instead it proved they were over rated. But at least the students got to got nuts for a few minutes and feel good about something, even though it was a mirageFire_Marshall_Bill said:It's
A one seed >> rushing the field over wins vs. historic fball also-ransMikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
It was pretty cool and an impressive accomplishment. It would have been way more impressive had they made the Final 4.
That game sucked . UW was the real deal that year(as in top 10 not top 5 though) but easily played their worst game that day.
Wished that team had a sophomore Brockman or even a freshman Hawes.
The guard play was unbelievable. Romar owes a lot to Bender and Slick Rick for setting him up so nicely.
Think about that.
-
TrueRoadDawg55 said:
The problem is even if Romar has studs, he gets outcoached by all the good coaches. Almost every time UW plays a good team in non conference, we lose. This has happened even when we have had good teams.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:* warning * thread hijack *
I'd like to strive to be a two sport school. There aren't a shitload, but it's not as hard as the numbers make it out to be if you're a football school since it's easier to build up a basketball program.
Like I said earlier today, if LoRo had some killer recruits coming in, maybe you see what happens. OTOH, he doesn't have the coaching acumen to bring in and develop tough, gritty four year players ala the Gonfaga-mid-major way.
So what do you do? Just wait and hope he lands three or four studs? Or Woody can be proactive and try to do something about it now. Unfortunately guilty white crocheting liberal fags and know-it-all black lesbians with shaved heads would cry racism if he was canned now.
-
Jensen and Rollins were literally the only bigs.dnc said:
Those guards were beyond anything we'll ever see at UW again. That team earnHe_Needs_More_Time said:
A shitty draw. UW was ranked 7th but a #1 seed and Louisville ranked #4 but a 4 seed.RoadDawg55 said:
You can get excited over a #1 seed AND be pissed at the loss to Louisville. Abundance. BTW, they lost to a Louisville team that went 33-5 and made the Final Four. It's not like they lost to a shitty mid major.MikeDamone said:
It only would have been impressive if they made it to the final for...or even 8..instead it proved they were over rated. But at least the students got to got nuts for a few minutes and feel good about something, even though it was a mirageFire_Marshall_Bill said:It's
A one seed >> rushing the field over wins vs. historic fball also-ransMikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
It was pretty cool and an impressive accomplishment. It would have been way more impressive had they made the Final 4.
That game sucked . UW was the real deal that year(as in top 10 not top 5 though) but easily played their worst game that day.
Wished that team had a sophomore Brockman or even a freshman Hawes.
The guard play was unbelievable. Romar owes a lot to Bender and Slick Rick for setting him up so nicely.
ed a #1 seed (#3 in RPI) with Mike Jensen as its best big man.
Think about that.
Bobby Jones and Roy(who injured and never 100% that year) played the 4.
Yet UW still led the league in rebounding despite not one guy in the top 10.
Will Conroy still the model point guard. Weird how despite all these high recruits nobody has been able to match Conroy outside Thomas 2011. Leadership, floor general , commanded the game and always hitting big shots. -
I still can't believe Louisville was a 4 seed. Conference USA was a joke during that era but it was still a Rick Pitino coached team, obviously they were legit.He_Needs_More_Time said:
A shitty draw. UW was ranked 7th but a #1 seed and Louisville ranked #4 but a 4 seed.RoadDawg55 said:
You can get excited over a #1 seed AND be pissed at the loss to Louisville. Abundance. BTW, they lost to a Louisville team that went 33-5 and made the Final Four. It's not like they lost to a shitty mid major.MikeDamone said:
It only would have been impressive if they made it to the final for...or even 8..instead it proved they were over rated. But at least the students got to got nuts for a few minutes and feel good about something, even though it was a mirageFire_Marshall_Bill said:It's
A one seed >> rushing the field over wins vs. historic fball also-ransMikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
It was pretty cool and an impressive accomplishment. It would have been way more impressive had they made the Final 4.
That game sucked . UW was the real deal that year(as in top 10 not top 5 though) but easily played their worst game that day.
Wished that team had a sophomore Brockman or even a freshman Hawes.
The guard play was unbelievable. Romar owes a lot to Bender and Slick Rick for setting him up so nicely. -
That's my point. UW was overrated as a number 1 seed. Louisville was ranked higher and favored in the game and had a more impressive season. Yet doogs went bananas because a committee made a mistake. UWs best team ever gets them a fake #1 seed and a butt kicking in the sweet 16. A true number 1 seed doesn't get a shitty draw in the sweet 16. But a non deserving #1 seed does.He_Needs_More_Time said:
A shitty draw. UW was ranked 7th but a #1 seed and Louisville ranked #4 but a 4 seed.RoadDawg55 said:
You can get excited over a #1 seed AND be pissed at the loss to Louisville. Abundance. BTW, they lost to a Louisville team that went 33-5 and made the Final Four. It's not like they lost to a shitty mid major.MikeDamone said:
It only would have been impressive if they made it to the final for...or even 8..instead it proved they were over rated. But at least the students got to got nuts for a few minutes and feel good about something, even though it was a mirageFire_Marshall_Bill said:It's
A one seed >> rushing the field over wins vs. historic fball also-ransMikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
It was pretty cool and an impressive accomplishment. It would have been way more impressive had they made the Final 4.
That game sucked . UW was the real deal that year(as in top 10 not top 5 though) but easily played their worst game that day.
Wished that team had a sophomore Brockman or even a freshman Hawes.
The guard play was unbelievable. Romar owes a lot to Bender and Slick Rick for setting him up so nicely.
#magicalseaon
#rushthecourt -
Id love to see Damones take on Gonzaga's #1 seed last year.
-
Yeah...that was bad...I wonder if the students gathered in their arena and flipped out after the announcement? Probably. The had a Schmitt schedule last year too. Easy street. While they have been more successful than UW, they still haven't won shit. Great 8 in the magical season on 1999 and a bunch of flame outs in the round of 32. Everyone's favorite Cinderella. Fuck them, fuck me , fuck everyone. Basketball in the northwest...#magicalHe_Needs_More_Time said:Id love to see Damones take on Gonzaga's #1 seed last year.
-
Damone knows less about college basketball than the Doogman Lemon Party trio.MikeDamone said:
That's my point. UW was overrated as a number 1 seed. Louisville was ranked higher and favored in the game and had a more impressive season. Yet doogs went bananas because a committee made a mistake. UWs best team ever gets them a fake #1 seed and a butt kicking in the sweet 16. A true number 1 seed doesn't get a shitty draw in the sweet 16. But a non deserving #1 seed does.He_Needs_More_Time said:
A shitty draw. UW was ranked 7th but a #1 seed and Louisville ranked #4 but a 4 seed.RoadDawg55 said:
You can get excited over a #1 seed AND be pissed at the loss to Louisville. Abundance. BTW, they lost to a Louisville team that went 33-5 and made the Final Four. It's not like they lost to a shitty mid major.MikeDamone said:
It only would have been impressive if they made it to the final for...or even 8..instead it proved they were over rated. But at least the students got to got nuts for a few minutes and feel good about something, even though it was a mirageFire_Marshall_Bill said:It's
A one seed >> rushing the field over wins vs. historic fball also-ransMikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
It was pretty cool and an impressive accomplishment. It would have been way more impressive had they made the Final 4.
That game sucked . UW was the real deal that year(as in top 10 not top 5 though) but easily played their worst game that day.
Wished that team had a sophomore Brockman or even a freshman Hawes.
The guard play was unbelievable. Romar owes a lot to Bender and Slick Rick for setting him up so nicely.
#magicalseaon
#rushthecourt
Embarrassing.
UW earned a #1 seed in 2004-2005. Check the facts:
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology/nitty-gritty-report/2004-05 -
Looks magical....TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Damone knows less about college basketball than the Doogman Lemon Party trio.MikeDamone said:
That's my point. UW was overrated as a number 1 seed. Louisville was ranked higher and favored in the game and had a more impressive season. Yet doogs went bananas because a committee made a mistake. UWs best team ever gets them a fake #1 seed and a butt kicking in the sweet 16. A true number 1 seed doesn't get a shitty draw in the sweet 16. But a non deserving #1 seed does.He_Needs_More_Time said:
A shitty draw. UW was ranked 7th but a #1 seed and Louisville ranked #4 but a 4 seed.RoadDawg55 said:
You can get excited over a #1 seed AND be pissed at the loss to Louisville. Abundance. BTW, they lost to a Louisville team that went 33-5 and made the Final Four. It's not like they lost to a shitty mid major.MikeDamone said:
It only would have been impressive if they made it to the final for...or even 8..instead it proved they were over rated. But at least the students got to got nuts for a few minutes and feel good about something, even though it was a mirageFire_Marshall_Bill said:It's
A one seed >> rushing the field over wins vs. historic fball also-ransMikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
It was pretty cool and an impressive accomplishment. It would have been way more impressive had they made the Final 4.
That game sucked . UW was the real deal that year(as in top 10 not top 5 though) but easily played their worst game that day.
Wished that team had a sophomore Brockman or even a freshman Hawes.
The guard play was unbelievable. Romar owes a lot to Bender and Slick Rick for setting him up so nicely.
#magicalseaon
#rushthecourt
Embarrassing.
UW earned a #1 seed in 2004-2005. Check the facts:
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology/nitty-gritty-report/2004-05
Real number ones make it to at least the final 8. Champions don't shit the bed during championship season.
HTH. -
All #1 seeds make it to the elite 8. I've never seen Duke get a #1 seed and lose in the Sweet 16. Check the tournament history. Every year a #1 seed loses in the Sweet 16.MikeDamone said:
Looks magical....TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Damone knows less about college basketball than the Doogman Lemon Party trio.MikeDamone said:
That's my point. UW was overrated as a number 1 seed. Louisville was ranked higher and favored in the game and had a more impressive season. Yet doogs went bananas because a committee made a mistake. UWs best team ever gets them a fake #1 seed and a butt kicking in the sweet 16. A true number 1 seed doesn't get a shitty draw in the sweet 16. But a non deserving #1 seed does.He_Needs_More_Time said:
A shitty draw. UW was ranked 7th but a #1 seed and Louisville ranked #4 but a 4 seed.RoadDawg55 said:
You can get excited over a #1 seed AND be pissed at the loss to Louisville. Abundance. BTW, they lost to a Louisville team that went 33-5 and made the Final Four. It's not like they lost to a shitty mid major.MikeDamone said:
It only would have been impressive if they made it to the final for...or even 8..instead it proved they were over rated. But at least the students got to got nuts for a few minutes and feel good about something, even though it was a mirageFire_Marshall_Bill said:It's
A one seed >> rushing the field over wins vs. historic fball also-ransMikeDamone said:
I guess almost winning something is worth going nuts over. *sizzleRoadDawg55 said:Is nobody supposed to celebrate anything but a championship? At the time, it was a big deal and a good accomplishment.
In the age of rushing the field after beating Stanford, it makes sense.
It was pretty cool and an impressive accomplishment. It would have been way more impressive had they made the Final 4.
That game sucked . UW was the real deal that year(as in top 10 not top 5 though) but easily played their worst game that day.
Wished that team had a sophomore Brockman or even a freshman Hawes.
The guard play was unbelievable. Romar owes a lot to Bender and Slick Rick for setting him up so nicely.
#magicalseaon
#rushthecourt
Embarrassing.
UW earned a #1 seed in 2004-2005. Check the facts:
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology/nitty-gritty-report/2004-05
Real number ones make it to at least the final 8. Champions don't shit the bed during championship season.
HTH.
I agree withy you that those fans that went crazy at a pep rally are lame. Only doogs would go to a pep rally for the NCAA Seeding party. Sven is right about the rest of your post. You don't know anything about college basketball.. Or the NFL.
-
I wonder if duke ever has had a magical season that ended in the third round of the NCAA.
And since I have to spell it out apparently, the whole point of this thread is mock the lame fans...just like the point of my Seahawk posts are to mock 12s..
But it's to be excepted in seattle.
-
Here Damone let me show you year by year the #1 seeds that lost in the sweet 16. Were none of these teams true #1's? It happens every year. Most teams have selection parties where fans go crazy over getting a #1 seed. I agree with you about those fans being lame. Stick to making fun of fans that go to pep rallies.
2013- #1 Indiana lost to #4 Syracuse, #1 Kansas lost to #4 Michigan, #1 Gonzaga lost to #9 Wichita State (round of 32). One #1 seed made it past the Sweet 16.
2012- #1 Michigan State lost to #4 Louisville.
2011- #1 Ohio State lost to #4 Kentucky, #1 Duke lost to #5 Arizona, #1 Pittsburgh lost to #9 Butler (round of 32)
2010- #1 Kansas lost to #9 Northern Iowa (32), #1 Syracuse lost to #5 Butler
In 2005 Duke also lost in the Sweet 16 to Michigan State. I skipped a bunch of years to not bore you with facts. -
RoadDawg wins the serious discussion portion of this thread.RoadDawg55 said:Here Damone let me show you year by year the #1 seeds that lost in the sweet 16. Were none of these teams true #1's? It happens every year. Most teams have selection parties where fans go crazy over getting a #1 seed. I agree with you about those fans being lame. Stick to making fun of fans that go to pep rallies.
2013- #1 Kansas lost to #4 Syracuse, #1 Kansas lost to #4 Michigan, #1 Gonzaga lost to #9 Wichita State (round of 32). One #1 seed made it past the Sweet 16.
2012- #1 Michigan State lost to #4 Louisville.
2011- #1 Ohio State lost to #4 Kentucky, #1 Duke lost to #5 Arizona, #1 Pittsburgh lost to #9 Butler (round of 32)
2010- #1 Kansas lost to #9 Northern Iowa (32), #1 Syracuse lost to #5 Butler
In 2005 Duke also lost in the Sweet 16 to Michigan State. I skipped a bunch of years to not bore you with facts.
Now, can we get back to making fun of the Ballas?
-
Who the fuck is calling it a magical season here? I'm sure Duke doesn't have pep rallies where people cheer over a #1 seed.MikeDamone said:I wonder if duke ever has had a magical season that ended in the third round of the NCAA.
And since I have to spell it out apparently, the whole point of this thread is mock the lame fans...just like the point of my Seahawk posts are to mock 12s..
But it's to be excepted in seattle. -
For Christ sake. Unwad your panties.RoadDawg55 said:
Who the fuck is calling it a magical season here? I'm sure Duke doesn't have pep rallies where people cheer over a #1 seed.MikeDamone said:I wonder if duke ever has had a magical season that ended in the third round of the NCAA.
And since I have to spell it out apparently, the whole point of this thread is mock the lame fans...just like the point of my Seahawk posts are to mock 12s..
But it's to be excepted in seattle.
-
Fuck..finally someone who gets it. Jesus H.dnc said:
RoadDawg wins the serious discussion portion of this thread.RoadDawg55 said:Here Damone let me show you year by year the #1 seeds that lost in the sweet 16. Were none of these teams true #1's? It happens every year. Most teams have selection parties where fans go crazy over getting a #1 seed. I agree with you about those fans being lame. Stick to making fun of fans that go to pep rallies.
2013- #1 Kansas lost to #4 Syracuse, #1 Kansas lost to #4 Michigan, #1 Gonzaga lost to #9 Wichita State (round of 32). One #1 seed made it past the Sweet 16.
2012- #1 Michigan State lost to #4 Louisville.
2011- #1 Ohio State lost to #4 Kentucky, #1 Duke lost to #5 Arizona, #1 Pittsburgh lost to #9 Butler (round of 32)
2010- #1 Kansas lost to #9 Northern Iowa (32), #1 Syracuse lost to #5 Butler
In 2005 Duke also lost in the Sweet 16 to Michigan State. I skipped a bunch of years to not bore you with facts.
Now, can we get back to making fun of the Ballas?
It's getting to be like revenge of the nerds around here. I'm sorry I hurt your feeling roaddawg by saying UW was an overrated #1. And that is the greatest achievement in the history of the program.
-
No need to. DNC had it right. Let's go back to making fun of the Balla Twins. Pointing out that you don't know a thing about college basketball isn't that fun.MikeDamone said:
For Christ sake. Unwad your panties.RoadDawg55 said:
Who the fuck is calling it a magical season here? I'm sure Duke doesn't have pep rallies where people cheer over a #1 seed.MikeDamone said:I wonder if duke ever has had a magical season that ended in the third round of the NCAA.
And since I have to spell it out apparently, the whole point of this thread is mock the lame fans...just like the point of my Seahawk posts are to mock 12s..
But it's to be excepted in seattle.
-
Dude..I WAS MAKING FUN OF THE BALLA TWINS AND THAT's WHY I STARTED THIS! then then you decided to get a tight anus over it.RoadDawg55 said:
No need to. DNC had it right. Let's go back to making fun of the Balla Twins. Pointing out that you don't know a thing about college basketball isn't that fun.MikeDamone said:
For Christ sake. Unwad your panties.RoadDawg55 said:
Who the fuck is calling it a magical season here? I'm sure Duke doesn't have pep rallies where people cheer over a #1 seed.MikeDamone said:I wonder if duke ever has had a magical season that ended in the third round of the NCAA.
And since I have to spell it out apparently, the whole point of this thread is mock the lame fans...just like the point of my Seahawk posts are to mock 12s..
But it's to be excepted in seattle.
I'm sure if UW could just get the right coach they could make several deep tournament runs...happy now? -
You say that like it's a bad thing.MikeDamone said:
Dude..I WAS MAKING FUN OF THE BALLA TWINS AND THAT's WHY I STARTED THIS! then then you decided to get a tight anus over it.RoadDawg55 said:
No need to. DNC had it right. Let's go back to making fun of the Balla Twins. Pointing out that you don't know a thing about college basketball isn't that fun.MikeDamone said:
For Christ sake. Unwad your panties.RoadDawg55 said:
Who the fuck is calling it a magical season here? I'm sure Duke doesn't have pep rallies where people cheer over a #1 seed.MikeDamone said:I wonder if duke ever has had a magical season that ended in the third round of the NCAA.
And since I have to spell it out apparently, the whole point of this thread is mock the lame fans...just like the point of my Seahawk posts are to mock 12s..
But it's to be excepted in seattle.
I'm sure if UW could just get the right coach they could make several deep tournament runs...happy now?
-
So now you're saying that Woodward needs more time to get his guy in here?MikeDamone said:
I'm sure if UW could just get the right coach they could make several deep tournament runs...happy now?RoadDawg55 said:
No need to. DNC had it right. Let's go back to making fun of the Balla Twins. Pointing out that you don't know a thing about college basketball isn't that fun.MikeDamone said:
For Christ sake. Unwad your panties.RoadDawg55 said:
Who the fuck is calling it a magical season here? I'm sure Duke doesn't have pep rallies where people cheer over a #1 seed.MikeDamone said:I wonder if duke ever has had a magical season that ended in the third round of the NCAA.
And since I have to spell it out apparently, the whole point of this thread is mock the lame fans...just like the point of my Seahawk posts are to mock 12s..
But it's to be excepted in seattle.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
