Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

this team would be better with Pete in an advisory role

2

Comments

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Just bend over and take it. Petersen isn’t going anywhere. If you think the uw is going to fire a guy who has been to 3 NY6 bowls in the last three years and won the pac 12 2 of the last 3 years you don’t know UW. Remember, this is the place that destroyed Don James and let a coach spiral to 0-12. Petersen is at uw as long as he wants to be. Simple fact. Most big money donors and fans are delighted with him.

    No one is saying he is going anywhere. Im using hyperbole to point out how fucking stupid it is that Petersen wont build an identity on offense other than being soft. Hope this helps
    OK. It’s stupid. Now what?
    We drink!
    Hell YEAH! Win or lose we boooze!!!!!!
  • halfbrainmanmolder
    halfbrainmanmolder Member Posts: 215

    The problem might be that Pete is in too much of an advisory role.

    This. I am totally fine with him being the head coach (do we? honestly have any choice?) but he should spend all his time with his family on Saturday and everyone will be better off.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    The problem might be that Pete is in too much of an advisory role.

    This. I am totally fine with him being the head coach (do we? honestly have any choice?) but he should spend all his time with his family on Saturday and everyone will be better off.
    Kinda opposite of what I was getting at, but carry on.
  • whuggy
    whuggy Member Posts: 2,088

    whuggy said:

    Most agree that Petersen needs to let go of the offense and hire an OC with autonomy. Pretty much no argument.
    The real question is will Pete's ego allow that to happen? He has proven he can't get to the next level with his offense.
    If he hires a new OC and Washington becomes elite then it's the new guy who gets credit for getting them there. I'm a bit skeptical that Pete's personality would handle that well. Would be thrilled to be wrong.

    Consider an alternative hypothesis that's he's let the offense go too much, overly trusting in unqualified OCs from his own tree. Ego working in another direction.

    I don't know if that's the right way to look at it. But I'm beginning to think it might be at least a factor.
    I'm gonna guess that since we see the godawful WR screen game under both Smith and Hamdan that Pete pretty much still has his mitts all over this offense.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,209
    whuggy said:

    whuggy said:

    Most agree that Petersen needs to let go of the offense and hire an OC with autonomy. Pretty much no argument.
    The real question is will Pete's ego allow that to happen? He has proven he can't get to the next level with his offense.
    If he hires a new OC and Washington becomes elite then it's the new guy who gets credit for getting them there. I'm a bit skeptical that Pete's personality would handle that well. Would be thrilled to be wrong.

    Consider an alternative hypothesis that's he's let the offense go too much, overly trusting in unqualified OCs from his own tree. Ego working in another direction.

    I don't know if that's the right way to look at it. But I'm beginning to think it might be at least a factor.
    I'm gonna guess that since we see the godawful WR screen game under both Smith and Hamdan that Pete pretty much still has his mitts all over this offense.
    This. The offense sucked in 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19

    It didnt suck with a fucking loaded roster in 16...except it did against talented players. Then it really fucking sucked.

    Does that work for you @GrundleStiltzkin ? Who gives a fuck about 2011 anyways that was a decade ago now
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    whuggy said:

    whuggy said:

    Most agree that Petersen needs to let go of the offense and hire an OC with autonomy. Pretty much no argument.
    The real question is will Pete's ego allow that to happen? He has proven he can't get to the next level with his offense.
    If he hires a new OC and Washington becomes elite then it's the new guy who gets credit for getting them there. I'm a bit skeptical that Pete's personality would handle that well. Would be thrilled to be wrong.

    Consider an alternative hypothesis that's he's let the offense go too much, overly trusting in unqualified OCs from his own tree. Ego working in another direction.

    I don't know if that's the right way to look at it. But I'm beginning to think it might be at least a factor.
    I'm gonna guess that since we see the godawful WR screen game under both Smith and Hamdan that Pete pretty much still has his mitts all over this offense.
    This. The offense sucked in 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19

    It didnt suck with a fucking loaded roster in 16...except it did against talented players. Then it really fucking sucked.

    Does that work for you @GrundleStiltzkin ? Who gives a fuck about 2011 anyways that was a decade ago now
    You brought up 2011.

    Whether too much or too little Petersemens offensive involvement, the results are the same. The difference is in the remedy, and for that, I don't got buyout money.
  • whuggy
    whuggy Member Posts: 2,088

    whuggy said:

    whuggy said:

    Most agree that Petersen needs to let go of the offense and hire an OC with autonomy. Pretty much no argument.
    The real question is will Pete's ego allow that to happen? He has proven he can't get to the next level with his offense.
    If he hires a new OC and Washington becomes elite then it's the new guy who gets credit for getting them there. I'm a bit skeptical that Pete's personality would handle that well. Would be thrilled to be wrong.

    Consider an alternative hypothesis that's he's let the offense go too much, overly trusting in unqualified OCs from his own tree. Ego working in another direction.

    I don't know if that's the right way to look at it. But I'm beginning to think it might be at least a factor.
    I'm gonna guess that since we see the godawful WR screen game under both Smith and Hamdan that Pete pretty much still has his mitts all over this offense.
    This. The offense sucked in 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19

    It didnt suck with a fucking loaded roster in 16...except it did against talented players. Then it really fucking sucked.

    Does that work for you @GrundleStiltzkin ? Who gives a fuck about 2011 anyways that was a decade ago now
    You brought up 2011.

    Whether too much or too little Petersemens offensive involvement, the results are the same. The difference is in the remedy, and for that, I don't got buyout money.
    He doesn't need buying out. He needs butting out.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club
    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,209
    edited October 2019

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
    Great garbage time offense as always

    JFC
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    Bump
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,209
    edited October 2019

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
    Great garbage time offense as always

    JFC
    Yeah I guess you prefer scoring fucking 7 against ASU, 10 and 19 vs fucking Cal, 7 fucking points in the fucking CFP, 13 vs USC in the biggest home game in 20 years, and then 13 against the worst fucking defense ever in Stanford.

    Petersen wishes he had a fucking garbage time offense.

    Jesus Christ you fucking doog. No one is saying Sark is a better coach. The point is Petes offense fucking sucks. Badly. Very badly to the point Sarks was probably better, and Sark had a shit defense that never bailed him out. Pete has an amazing one

    Get it now? Fuck off
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
    Great garbage time offense as always

    JFC
    Yeah I guess you prefer scoring fucking 7 against ASU, 10 and 19 vs fucking Cal, 7 fucking points in the fucking CFP, 13 vs USC in the biggest home game in 20 years, and then 13 against the worst fucking defense ever in Stanford.

    Petersen wishes he had a fucking garbage time offense.

    Jesus Christ you fucking doog. No one is saying Sark is a better coach. The point is Petes offense fucking sucks. Badly. Very badly to the point Sarks was probably better, and Sark had a shit defense that never bailed him out. Pete has an amazing one

    Get it now? Fuck off
    Sark sucked on offense. Only a fucking moron would pine for him to come back

    Get it moron?
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,209

    PGOS
    LIFI
    EVFZ
    AEEZ
    S NL
    E SE
      I 
      V 
      E 
    Pgos for OC.

    Im better than Sark and Peterman combined
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,209

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
    Great garbage time offense as always

    JFC
    Yeah I guess you prefer scoring fucking 7 against ASU, 10 and 19 vs fucking Cal, 7 fucking points in the fucking CFP, 13 vs USC in the biggest home game in 20 years, and then 13 against the worst fucking defense ever in Stanford.

    Petersen wishes he had a fucking garbage time offense.

    Jesus Christ you fucking doog. No one is saying Sark is a better coach. The point is Petes offense fucking sucks. Badly. Very badly to the point Sarks was probably better, and Sark had a shit defense that never bailed him out. Pete has an amazing one

    Get it now? Fuck off
    Sark sucked on offense. Only a fucking moron would pine for him to come back

    Get it moron?
    No one is pining for him to come back. Christ

    It is a comparison. And frankly one that Sark wins. I guess Pete can run up the score on the 2016 Oregons and the BYUs of the world so that is fucking cool sizzle dude brah shit.

    Youre not getting it. Hire someone with a proven track record and give them the fucking reigns. He should've hired Sonny Dykes for fucks sake.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
    Great garbage time offense as always

    JFC
    Yeah I guess you prefer scoring fucking 7 against ASU, 10 and 19 vs fucking Cal, 7 fucking points in the fucking CFP, 13 vs USC in the biggest home game in 20 years, and then 13 against the worst fucking defense ever in Stanford.

    Petersen wishes he had a fucking garbage time offense.

    Jesus Christ you fucking doog. No one is saying Sark is a better coach. The point is Petes offense fucking sucks. Badly. Very badly to the point Sarks was probably better, and Sark had a shit defense that never bailed him out. Pete has an amazing one

    Get it now? Fuck off
    Sark sucked on offense. Only a fucking moron would pine for him to come back

    Get it moron?
    No one is pining for him to come back. Christ

    It is a comparison. And frankly one that Sark wins. I guess Pete can run up the score on the 2016 Oregons and the BYUs of the world so that is fucking cool sizzle dude brah shit.

    Youre not getting it. Hire someone with a proven track record and give them the fucking reigns. He should've hired Sonny Dykes for fucks sake.
    PGOS
    LEUA
    ETRR
    A  K
    S   
    E   
        
        
        
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,209
    G R U N D L E S T I L T Z K I N
    A
    Y
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
    Great garbage time offense as always

    JFC
    Yeah I guess you prefer scoring fucking 7 against ASU, 10 and 19 vs fucking Cal, 7 fucking points in the fucking CFP, 13 vs USC in the biggest home game in 20 years, and then 13 against the worst fucking defense ever in Stanford.

    Petersen wishes he had a fucking garbage time offense.

    Jesus Christ you fucking doog. No one is saying Sark is a better coach. The point is Petes offense fucking sucks. Badly. Very badly to the point Sarks was probably better, and Sark had a shit defense that never bailed him out. Pete has an amazing one

    Get it now? Fuck off
    Sark sucked on offense. Only a fucking moron would pine for him to come back

    Get it moron?
    No one is pining for him to come back. Christ

    It is a comparison. And frankly one that Sark wins. I guess Pete can run up the score on the 2016 Oregons and the BYUs of the world so that is fucking cool sizzle dude brah shit.

    Youre not getting it. Hire someone with a proven track record and give them the fucking reigns. He should've hired Sonny Dykes for fucks sake.
    Sark sucked against good teams

    Hope this helps

    Sark doesn't win any comparison
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,209

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
    Great garbage time offense as always

    JFC
    Yeah I guess you prefer scoring fucking 7 against ASU, 10 and 19 vs fucking Cal, 7 fucking points in the fucking CFP, 13 vs USC in the biggest home game in 20 years, and then 13 against the worst fucking defense ever in Stanford.

    Petersen wishes he had a fucking garbage time offense.

    Jesus Christ you fucking doog. No one is saying Sark is a better coach. The point is Petes offense fucking sucks. Badly. Very badly to the point Sarks was probably better, and Sark had a shit defense that never bailed him out. Pete has an amazing one

    Get it now? Fuck off
    Sark sucked on offense. Only a fucking moron would pine for him to come back

    Get it moron?
    No one is pining for him to come back. Christ

    It is a comparison. And frankly one that Sark wins. I guess Pete can run up the score on the 2016 Oregons and the BYUs of the world so that is fucking cool sizzle dude brah shit.

    Youre not getting it. Hire someone with a proven track record and give them the fucking reigns. He should've hired Sonny Dykes for fucks sake.
    Sark sucked against good teams

    Hope this helps

    Sark doesn't win any comparison
    Pete sucks just as bad against good teams. Honestly who the fuck has Pete beaten that is good? A really injured Stanford team in 16? Fucking Colorado or Utah? Give me a break.

    Sark had a better offense than Pete even though it was very average. Admit it and don't be stubborn.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
    Great garbage time offense as always

    JFC
    Yeah I guess you prefer scoring fucking 7 against ASU, 10 and 19 vs fucking Cal, 7 fucking points in the fucking CFP, 13 vs USC in the biggest home game in 20 years, and then 13 against the worst fucking defense ever in Stanford.

    Petersen wishes he had a fucking garbage time offense.

    Jesus Christ you fucking doog. No one is saying Sark is a better coach. The point is Petes offense fucking sucks. Badly. Very badly to the point Sarks was probably better, and Sark had a shit defense that never bailed him out. Pete has an amazing one

    Get it now? Fuck off
    Sark sucked on offense. Only a fucking moron would pine for him to come back

    Get it moron?
    No one is pining for him to come back. Christ

    It is a comparison. And frankly one that Sark wins. I guess Pete can run up the score on the 2016 Oregons and the BYUs of the world so that is fucking cool sizzle dude brah shit.

    Youre not getting it. Hire someone with a proven track record and give them the fucking reigns. He should've hired Sonny Dykes for fucks sake.
    Sark sucked against good teams

    Hope this helps

    Sark doesn't win any comparison
    Pete sucks just as bad against good teams. Honestly who the fuck has Pete beaten that is good? A really injured Stanford team in 16? Fucking Colorado or Utah? Give me a break.

    Sark had a better offense than Pete even though it was very average. Admit it and don't be stubborn.
    Sark did not have a better offense

    Of all the moronic shit this week you take the cake

    Just embarrassing

    For you
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club
    I like how Sark stacked up three and outs with Bama talent and lost the title game and got run

    But he's great!

  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,209

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
    Great garbage time offense as always

    JFC
    Yeah I guess you prefer scoring fucking 7 against ASU, 10 and 19 vs fucking Cal, 7 fucking points in the fucking CFP, 13 vs USC in the biggest home game in 20 years, and then 13 against the worst fucking defense ever in Stanford.

    Petersen wishes he had a fucking garbage time offense.

    Jesus Christ you fucking doog. No one is saying Sark is a better coach. The point is Petes offense fucking sucks. Badly. Very badly to the point Sarks was probably better, and Sark had a shit defense that never bailed him out. Pete has an amazing one

    Get it now? Fuck off
    Sark sucked on offense. Only a fucking moron would pine for him to come back

    Get it moron?
    No one is pining for him to come back. Christ

    It is a comparison. And frankly one that Sark wins. I guess Pete can run up the score on the 2016 Oregons and the BYUs of the world so that is fucking cool sizzle dude brah shit.

    Youre not getting it. Hire someone with a proven track record and give them the fucking reigns. He should've hired Sonny Dykes for fucks sake.
    Sark sucked against good teams

    Hope this helps

    Sark doesn't win any comparison
    Pete sucks just as bad against good teams. Honestly who the fuck has Pete beaten that is good? A really injured Stanford team in 16? Fucking Colorado or Utah? Give me a break.

    Sark had a better offense than Pete even though it was very average. Admit it and don't be stubborn.
    Sark did not have a better offense

    Of all the moronic shit this week you take the cake

    Just embarrassing

    For you
    Lmfao. Keep telling yourself that old timer. 13 points in a loss to the worst stanford team in a decade....special bro! At least fucking Seven dropped 30 on them in a loss. Fuck off
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
    Great garbage time offense as always

    JFC
    Yeah I guess you prefer scoring fucking 7 against ASU, 10 and 19 vs fucking Cal, 7 fucking points in the fucking CFP, 13 vs USC in the biggest home game in 20 years, and then 13 against the worst fucking defense ever in Stanford.

    Petersen wishes he had a fucking garbage time offense.

    Jesus Christ you fucking doog. No one is saying Sark is a better coach. The point is Petes offense fucking sucks. Badly. Very badly to the point Sarks was probably better, and Sark had a shit defense that never bailed him out. Pete has an amazing one

    Get it now? Fuck off
    Sark sucked on offense. Only a fucking moron would pine for him to come back

    Get it moron?

  • CaptainPJ
    CaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
    Great garbage time offense as always

    JFC
    Yeah I guess you prefer scoring fucking 7 against ASU, 10 and 19 vs fucking Cal, 7 fucking points in the fucking CFP, 13 vs USC in the biggest home game in 20 years, and then 13 against the worst fucking defense ever in Stanford.

    Petersen wishes he had a fucking garbage time offense.

    Jesus Christ you fucking doog. No one is saying Sark is a better coach. The point is Petes offense fucking sucks. Badly. Very badly to the point Sarks was probably better, and Sark had a shit defense that never bailed him out. Pete has an amazing one

    Get it now? Fuck off
    Sark sucked on offense. Only a fucking moron would pine for him to come back

    Get it moron?
    No one is pining for him to come back. Christ

    It is a comparison. And frankly one that Sark wins. I guess Pete can run up the score on the 2016 Oregons and the BYUs of the world so that is fucking cool sizzle dude brah shit.

    Youre not getting it. Hire someone with a proven track record and give them the fucking reigns. He should've hired Sonny Dykes for fucks sake.
    Sark is a piece of shit
    Cripsed
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,209
    PurpleJ said:

    All you Sark lovers forget that his offense sucked against teams with a pulse too

    They would still score upper 20s Race. The defense would just get shredded for 40+ and the special teams were trash

    Pete is lucky to break 15 against teams in his ugly inexcusable losses.. USC, Bama, Cal twice, ASU, Stanford. Bama he sort of gets a pass, the rest is just fucking embarassing.

    This defense with Sarks offense is a WAY better team. It just fucking is.
    Great garbage time offense as always

    JFC
    Yeah I guess you prefer scoring fucking 7 against ASU, 10 and 19 vs fucking Cal, 7 fucking points in the fucking CFP, 13 vs USC in the biggest home game in 20 years, and then 13 against the worst fucking defense ever in Stanford.

    Petersen wishes he had a fucking garbage time offense.

    Jesus Christ you fucking doog. No one is saying Sark is a better coach. The point is Petes offense fucking sucks. Badly. Very badly to the point Sarks was probably better, and Sark had a shit defense that never bailed him out. Pete has an amazing one

    Get it now? Fuck off
    Sark sucked on offense. Only a fucking moron would pine for him to come back

    Get it moron?

    Seriously

    Saban the best HC of all time likes Sark

    End of story
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,209
    edited October 2019
    I appreciate you Race. Always fun to argue with you. Most of the lackeys around here just suck your dick and refrain from ever calling you out on anything.

    Bff buddy xoxoxox.

    75k

    Put me in your will
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Kind of hard to argue with your alt.

    @puppylove_sugarsteel pass the meds bro
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,209
    PurpleJ said:

    Kind of hard to argue with your alt.

    @puppylove_sugarsteel pass the meds bro

    Puppy ran out of the good under the table meds a long time ago. Its why his posting now sucks
  • CaptainPJ
    CaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986
    edited October 2019
    bigcc said:

    Tedford with even one year of full oc duty and personnel decisions would make this a NC caliber offense with Eason (emphasis on offense unless he helps our linebackers)

    Instead he's going to make haener look like a superstar next year.... If Petersen wants to stop taking so much heat, he needs to hire a superstar OC, hand him the reigns, and just coach the way the team functions

    Ummmmmmm, in case you haven’t heard. .

    Tedford was a CONSULTANT!

    HE WAS NEVER EVEN ALLOWED ON THE FIELD AND NEVER COACHED ANY OF THE PLAYERS!!

    AN X/Y GUY WITH NO INPUT!

    Cerca, 20. . . Who gives a fuck. Clear warning sign.

    Fucking retarded doogs