The Kurds
Comments
-
BRB, JORaceBannon said:
As one who thought it was a neat idea to make the Middle East safe for democracy I eventually came to the same conclusiondnc said:
I’m not sure it’s actually any worse under Islam.Sledog said:
Been that way forever and worse since mooselimbdom.dnc said:
Wtf is the status quo in the Middle East? Pre Trump? Pre US intervention?HHusky said:Sledog said:
I guess they figure out what to do with them then. Maybe Turkish bombs will settle that.HHusky said:
The people we're abandoning hold the prisoners. We don't.Sledog said:
We could execute all of them. Problem solved.GDS said:Agreeing with essentially all our military advisors that keeping a small contingent in Northern Syria to help the Kurds and ensure the 11k ISIS fighters captured and detained remain detained is now considered “pro-war”? FS
You're not really conversant in the facts of this situation, obviously.salemcoog said:
Welp. It was the toothless recklessness that got us in there in the first place, so there’s that.HHusky said:
It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to know how you gals would be howling if a Democrat had ever done anything this reckless.Sledog said:
And Simone has to yet us out. Short of executing 60k Isis trash there isn't much we can do. They'll be let go eventually and will go back to raping and pillaging. That's why they make drones.HHusky said:
Right. Daddy will destroy the Turkish economy on twitter.Sledog said:We'll see how it plays out. I'm not for abandoning allies. Problem here is they're both allies. Seems Trump's told Turkey there will be consequences if the they jump in. So we're to stay forever? The anti-war crowd is now pro war because they're anti Trump? TDS is very real.
We're there. People can argue about whether we should have been there, but that's the fact. As Colin Powell said to W about our military adventures, "You break it, you bought it."
And it would only take a WaPo or NYT article on how the poor ISIS were being abused in captivity for your team to demand release of them anyway.
But Trumps the bad guy. Not the country invading.
The status quo wasn’t getting civilians bombarded by a modern military.dnc said:Trusting Turkey with the ISIS fighters seems foolish as hell. Their "ally" status is always day to day.
That said, "Fighting between various groups that has been going on for hundreds of years. USA should never have been in Middle East" is as true as anything any American politician has said in years.
I don't love this move but I don't pretend to know what the best thing.
Fuck the Middle East.
Poor Turkey. Now Daddy, in his infinite wisdom, is going to destroy their economy.
I don’t know how anyone could even pretend to know what the status quo in the Middle East looks like, other than war and bloodshed.
It’s been jacked forever, probably will be jacked forever.
Leaving our troops as targets is a stupid plan that the left used to agree with me on
I took a tremendous amount of shit for backing the endless wars. -
-
RINOGDS said:
-
ISIS was already destroyed. Trump said so.
-
It sucks that the Kurds have been put in this position. It also sucks that we half assed our way in there and offered idle threats with so called red lines in the sand.HardlyClothed said:Is it good we’re fucking over the Kurds or not? Take a position. All you’ve offered is “we’ve fucked over the kurds for decades”. Does that make enabling their slaughter Ok? Yes or no.
The weird thing is that I’ve never heard such concern for the Kurds from anyone on here, Twitter or anywhere else until this week.
Why such concern now? -
We had lots of times we didn't change the status quo in order to help them. Here we are changing the status quo in a way that harms them. Those are meaningfully different things.salemcoog said:
It sucks that the Kurds have been put in this position. It also sucks that we half assed our way in there and offered idle threats with so called red lines in the sand.HardlyClothed said:Is it good we’re fucking over the Kurds or not? Take a position. All you’ve offered is “we’ve fucked over the kurds for decades”. Does that make enabling their slaughter Ok? Yes or no.
The weird thing is that I’ve never heard such concern for the Kurds from anyone on here, Twitter or anywhere else until this week.
Why such concern now? -
Eventually we would have to leave. So eventually this was gonna happen. These psychos have been murdering each other in the name of their religion for centuries now. There’s nothing the US can do about this.HHusky said:
We had lots of times we didn't change the status quo in order to help them. Here we are changing the status quo in a way that harms them. Those are meaningfully different things.salemcoog said:
It sucks that the Kurds have been put in this position. It also sucks that we half assed our way in there and offered idle threats with so called red lines in the sand.HardlyClothed said:Is it good we’re fucking over the Kurds or not? Take a position. All you’ve offered is “we’ve fucked over the kurds for decades”. Does that make enabling their slaughter Ok? Yes or no.
The weird thing is that I’ve never heard such concern for the Kurds from anyone on here, Twitter or anywhere else until this week.
Why such concern now?
What do you think the correct play should be? Forever occupation? -
Last I heard Trump thinks the dollar is too strong. Now you are celebrating the strength of the dollar? Which is it?PurpleThrobber said:
https://tradingeconomics.com/turkey/currencyHHusky said:
Right. Daddy will destroy the Turkish economy on twitter.Sledog said:We'll see how it plays out. I'm not for abandoning allies. Problem here is they're both allies. Seems Trump's told Turkey there will be consequences if the they jump in. So we're to stay forever? The anti-war crowd is now pro war because they're anti Trump? TDS is very real.
We're there. People can argue about whether we should have been there, but that's the fact. As Colin Powell said to W about our military adventures, "You break it, you bought it."
Click on the 5 year chart. It was about 2.74 lira to $1 USD in Nov 2016 - it's now in the 5.8 range. -
Whatever thoughtful strategy we might have employed, Daddy getting talked into an impulsive move during a phone call ain’t it.salemcoog said:
Eventually we would have to leave. So eventually this was gonna happen. These psychos have been murdering each other in the name of their religion for centuries now. There’s nothing the US can do about this.HHusky said:
We had lots of times we didn't change the status quo in order to help them. Here we are changing the status quo in a way that harms them. Those are meaningfully different things.salemcoog said:
It sucks that the Kurds have been put in this position. It also sucks that we half assed our way in there and offered idle threats with so called red lines in the sand.HardlyClothed said:Is it good we’re fucking over the Kurds or not? Take a position. All you’ve offered is “we’ve fucked over the kurds for decades”. Does that make enabling their slaughter Ok? Yes or no.
The weird thing is that I’ve never heard such concern for the Kurds from anyone on here, Twitter or anywhere else until this week.
Why such concern now?
What do you think the correct play should be? Forever occupation? -
"We" changed the status quo and hurt them when "we" decided to turn Syria into a hell-hole back in 2011/2012.HHusky said:
We had lots of times we didn't change the status quo in order to help them. Here we are changing the status quo in a way that harms them. Those are meaningfully different things.salemcoog said:
It sucks that the Kurds have been put in this position. It also sucks that we half assed our way in there and offered idle threats with so called red lines in the sand.HardlyClothed said:Is it good we’re fucking over the Kurds or not? Take a position. All you’ve offered is “we’ve fucked over the kurds for decades”. Does that make enabling their slaughter Ok? Yes or no.
The weird thing is that I’ve never heard such concern for the Kurds from anyone on here, Twitter or anywhere else until this week.
Why such concern now?
