this team would be better with Pete in an advisory role
Despite the defense sucking they still held Stanford to 23.
Stanford had one of the worst defense in the fucking country and held us to 13. With a fucking 5 star NFL QB, NFL lineman, NFL TEs and probably some NFL RBs too
I would be so fucking pissed if I was a defensive coach. Year after year, great defensive efforts are squandered.
Change the offense or step down Pete. You dont know shit about defense and your offense is bad. Just manage the day to day practice schedule
Comments
-
Even with the D "sucking", they are only giving up an average of 17 points
-
Can Pete be impeached?
-
Stanford's goal was to keep the ball out of our offense's hands and they did exactly that. We let them do exactly what they wanted to do all game.BeerThirty said:Even with the D "sucking", they are only giving up an average of 17 points
The D couldn't get off the field and Stanford had drives of 5:09, 6:33, 3:55, 7:07, and 5:06. -
Kwat or Lake? The guys whose defense just got obliterated by a limping Stanford team? Earlier this board was sucking Jimmy Smith's dick, and now we're slobbering the knobs of the two guys who are at the helm of this fast sinking shithole of a defense?
Jesus fucking Christ some of you guys are getting pathetic trying to grasp for answers here. Pete is all we're getting. If he doesn't figure his shit out we either stick with him and embrace the lukewarm seasons of never being good enough, or we hire someone else who will in all likelihood be another Sark retread giving us the occasional recruiting sizzle and dazzling Holiday Bowl win.
-
I said it a week ago
Cohen to SC
Pete as AD
Lake as HC -
They held Stanford to 23 points despite all that. The last 4 years we have not lost a game due to the defense. Every single game has been becuase the offense sucksGreenRiverGatorz said:Kwat or Lake? The guys whose defense just got obliterated by a limping Stanford team? Earlier this board was sucking Jimmy Smith's dick, and now we're slobbering the knobs of the two guys who are at the helm of this fast sinking shithole of a defense?
Jesus fucking Christ some of you guys are getting pathetic trying to grasp for answers here. Pete is all we're getting. If he doesn't figure his shit out we either stick with him and embrace the lukewarm seasons of never being good enough, or we hire someone else who will in all likelihood be another Sark retread giving us the occasional recruiting sizzle and dazzling Holiday Bowl win. -
Just bend over and take it. Petersen isn’t going anywhere. If you think the uw is going to fire a guy who has been to 3 NY6 bowls in the last three years and won the pac 12 2 of the last 3 years you don’t know UW. Remember, this is the place that destroyed Don James and let a coach spiral to 0-12. Petersen is at uw as long as he wants to be. Simple fact. Most big money donors and fans are delighted with him.
-
No one is saying he is going anywhere. Im using hyperbole to point out how fucking stupid it is that Petersen wont build an identity on offense other than being soft. Hope this helpsMikeDamone said:Just bend over and take it. Petersen isn’t going anywhere. If you think the uw is going to fire a guy who has been to 3 NY6 bowls in the last three years and won the pac 12 2 of the last 3 years you don’t know UW. Remember, this is the place that destroyed Don James and let a coach spiral to 0-12. Petersen is at uw as long as he wants to be. Simple fact. Most big money donors and fans are delighted with him.
-
I don't know how you can watch that game and argue that our defense was anything better than abysmal.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
They held Stanford to 23 points despite all that. The last 4 years we have not lost a game due to the defense. Every single game has been becuase the offense sucksGreenRiverGatorz said:Kwat or Lake? The guys whose defense just got obliterated by a limping Stanford team? Earlier this board was sucking Jimmy Smith's dick, and now we're slobbering the knobs of the two guys who are at the helm of this fast sinking shithole of a defense?
Jesus fucking Christ some of you guys are getting pathetic trying to grasp for answers here. Pete is all we're getting. If he doesn't figure his shit out we either stick with him and embrace the lukewarm seasons of never being good enough, or we hire someone else who will in all likelihood be another Sark retread giving us the occasional recruiting sizzle and dazzling Holiday Bowl win.
Stanford only scored 23 points because they didn't need any more than that. They converted any first down they wanted, racked up yards, and kept the ball out of our offense's hands. They had 40 minutes TOP compared to our 20. And when you factor in that we were playing against a backup QB with a second string OL, I'm not sure how you can grade the defense as anything above an F.
And no, the defense absolutely contributed to us losing our last two major bowl games. That unit has been on a slow decline for awhile, and Saturday was the bottom finally falling out. -
Sometimes I wonder why I even bother caring. We are a blind squirrel school.MikeDamone said:Just bend over and take it. Petersen isn’t going anywhere. If you think the uw is going to fire a guy who has been to 3 NY6 bowls in the last three years and won the pac 12 2 of the last 3 years you don’t know UW. Remember, this is the place that destroyed Don James and let a coach spiral to 0-12. Petersen is at uw as long as he wants to be. Simple fact. Most big money donors and fans are delighted with him.
