Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
When facts don’t fit the narrative ...
Comments
-
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..SFGbob said:
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?2001400ex said:
What's a homiacide?MikeDamone said:
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.2001400ex said:
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?SFGbob said:The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders. -
I put something to the test because of this thread.
I put my AR15 down my pants and walked around all day. it was uncomfortable as hell. Some friends came by and asked if I was having trouble with my privates. I thought that was offensive, tried to pull the AR15 out of my pants to scare them but they left before I finished.
I asked Mrs Lebam to shoot me with her Desert Eagle but she missed.
this proves guns don't kill.
Mrs Lebam also thinks I should quit smoking weed -
Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:2001400ex said:
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..SFGbob said:
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?2001400ex said:
What's a homiacide?MikeDamone said:
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.2001400ex said:
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?SFGbob said:The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick. -
Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?SFGbob said:
Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:2001400ex said:
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..SFGbob said:
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?2001400ex said:
What's a homiacide?MikeDamone said:
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.2001400ex said:
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?SFGbob said:The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. -
The numbers are for all homicides in the US. Those numbers include people killed in mass shootings. Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass, lie, and than ask to suck dick.2001400ex said:
Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?SFGbob said:
Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:2001400ex said:
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..SFGbob said:
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?2001400ex said:
What's a homiacide?MikeDamone said:
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.2001400ex said:
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?SFGbob said:The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. -
Read his analysis. Then read my statement. Fuck I've had better arguments with my wife.SFGbob said:
The numbers are for all homicides in the US. Those numbers include people killed in mass shootings. Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass, lie, and than ask to suck dick.2001400ex said:
Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?SFGbob said:
Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:2001400ex said:
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..SFGbob said:
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?2001400ex said:
What's a homiacide?MikeDamone said:
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.2001400ex said:
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?SFGbob said:The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. -
Why should his numbers break out "mass shootings" when the numbers are for everyone murdered through every form of homicide you can think of? They aren't just homicides by firearms Hondo, so why should they break out the numbers for just mass shootings?
The total number of homicides includes everyone murdered in a mass shooting.
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass and lie. Nice work dumbfuck. -
Hondo, don't blame the reader for the fact that you write like a fucking retard.2001400ex said:
Read his analysis. Then read my statement. Fuck I've had better arguments with my wife.SFGbob said:
The numbers are for all homicides in the US. Those numbers include people killed in mass shootings. Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass, lie, and than ask to suck dick.2001400ex said:
Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?SFGbob said:
Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:2001400ex said:
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..SFGbob said:
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?2001400ex said:
What's a homiacide?MikeDamone said:
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.2001400ex said:
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?SFGbob said:The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
That statement by you is a fucking lie. If you wanted people to come up with what the fuck you're trying to say you should stop writing like a fucking moron. Because what you said, isn't true. -
Ok. So tell me more about mass shootings. What’s the definition? You’re the only one mentioning trump. You seem angry murders are declining. That’s weird.2001400ex said:
What's a homiacide?MikeDamone said:
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.2001400ex said:
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?SFGbob said:The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders. -
I'm sure your wife always wins.2001400ex said:
Read his analysis. Then read my statement. Fuck I've had better arguments with my wife.SFGbob said:
The numbers are for all homicides in the US. Those numbers include people killed in mass shootings. Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass, lie, and than ask to suck dick.2001400ex said:
Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?SFGbob said:
Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:2001400ex said:
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..SFGbob said:
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?2001400ex said:
What's a homiacide?MikeDamone said:
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.2001400ex said:
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?SFGbob said:The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
