Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

When facts don’t fit the narrative ...

MikeDamone
MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
edited October 2019 in Tug Tavern
The facts are ignored.

“The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.

I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:

-Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)

-The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.

-Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.

-Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.

For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”

https://memepoliceman.com/analyzing-the-2018-fbi-homicide-data/
«1345

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Which narrative are you trying to squash?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,708 Standard Supporter

    The facts are ignored.

    “The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.

    I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:

    -Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)

    -The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.

    -Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.

    -Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.

    For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”

    https://memepoliceman.com/analyzing-the-2018-fbi-homicide-data/

    Rifles/long guns are ALWAYS a tiny percentage of murders. It's hard to put an AR in your pocket or waistband.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Which narrative are you trying to squash?

    The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

    Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.
    So you can't articulate anything. Got it.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    The facts are ignored.

    “The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.

    I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:

    -Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)

    -The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.

    -Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.

    -Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.

    For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”

    https://memepoliceman.com/analyzing-the-2018-fbi-homicide-data/

    Rifles/long guns are ALWAYS a tiny percentage of murders. It's hard to put an AR in your pocket or waistband.
    I came back expecting something dumb from you like "we should ban knives, blunt objects, and black people". Realized you actually have something more idiotic to say about the topic.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2019
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    The facts are ignored.

    “The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.

    I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:

    -Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)

    -The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.

    -Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.

    -Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.

    For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”

    https://memepoliceman.com/analyzing-the-2018-fbi-homicide-data/

    Rifles/long guns are ALWAYS a tiny percentage of murders. It's hard to put an AR in your pocket or waistband.
    I came back expecting something dumb from you like "we should ban knives, blunt objects, and black people". Realized you actually have something more idiotic to say about the topic.
    Seriously, you don’t get the point? You are truly one dumb mother fucker. Embarrassing
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2019
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Which narrative are you trying to squash?

    The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

    Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.
    So you can't articulate anything. Got it.
    The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Which narrative are you trying to squash?

    The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

    Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.
    So you can't articulate anything. Got it.
    The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?
    Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2019
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Which narrative are you trying to squash?

    The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

    Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.
    So you can't articulate anything. Got it.
    The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?
    Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.
    You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

    My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Which narrative are you trying to squash?

    The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

    Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.
    So you can't articulate anything. Got it.
    The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?
    Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.
    You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

    My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.
    You said when facts don't fit the narrative. Facts get ignored. You must be squashing some narrative then.

    Then after you whining about be adding words to your mouth. You then actually add words to my mouth.

    Funny how the article doesn't say anything about mass shootings. Wonder why that is? Maybe cause the facts didn't fit his narrative?