When facts don’t fit the narrative ...

Sledog said:

MikeDamone said:

The facts are ignored.

“The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.

I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:

-Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)

-The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.

-Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.

-Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.

For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”

https://memepoliceman.com/analyzing-the-2018-fbi-homicide-data/

Rifles/long guns are ALWAYS a tiny percentage of murders. It's hard to put an AR in your pocket or waistband.

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.

You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.

You said when facts don't fit the narrative. Facts get ignored. You must be squashing some narrative then.

Then after you whining about be adding words to your mouth. You then actually add words to my mouth.

Funny how the article doesn't say anything about mass shootings. Wonder why that is? Maybe cause the facts didn't fit his narrative?

You seem upset that you can’t figure it out. Or are you just mad something is presenting facts that don’t fit your narrative. The narratives ignored are in the article. (Which you didn’t read, obviously. Because that’s hard) If you disagree, articulate it. Rather than being an angry dipshit, as usual. I’m not squashing anything. I didn’t write the article or the post in quotes.

What narrative on mass shootings would you like to bring facts to?

Ok Mike. Let's start here. What was your point for posting this article. Articulate in your words your thought process.

I don’t speak retard, so since you disagree with the article, tell me what you disagree with. In your own words.

You must be in the “pissed off” group that is alluded to at the end of the quote.

Are you mad that murder rates are dropping?

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.

You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.

You said when facts don't fit the narrative. Facts get ignored. You must be squashing some narrative then.

Then after you whining about be adding words to your mouth. You then actually add words to my mouth.

Funny how the article doesn't say anything about mass shootings. Wonder why that is? Maybe cause the facts didn't fit his narrative?

You seem upset that you can’t figure it out. Or are you just mad something is presenting facts that don’t fit your narrative. The narratives ignored are in the article. (Which you didn’t read, obviously. Because that’s hard) If you disagree, articulate it. Rather than being an angry dipshit, as usual. I’m not squashing anything. I didn’t write the article or the post in quotes.

What narrative on mass shootings would you like to bring facts to?

Ok Mike. Let's start here. What was your point for posting this article. Articulate in your words your thought process.

I don’t speak retard, so since you disagree with the article, tell me what you disagree with. In your own words.

You must be in the “pissed off” group that is alluded to at the end of the quote.

Are you mad that murder rates are dropping?

It's great that murder rates are dropping. I already talked about one question I have about the article. You are free to go back and look. Now your turn Mike. You too dumb to articulate any points about the article? I thought it was a non partisan post Mike?

Mass shootings is your question? And why they aren’t included? Your typical straw man attempt, but I already asked what facts would you like to present that the author is supposedly avoiding. You had no answer.

MikeDamone said:

SFGbob said:

The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


White privilege.

Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

SFGbob said:

The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


White privilege.

Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?

First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!

You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.