Scott Huff and our mighty O Line
They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.
Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.
What's the deal?
Comments
-
Our o line has not really been a problem this year. USC's d line is really good.
-
Dude if you can’t see that other team is also talented. I can’t help you. They were finePostGameOrangeSlices said:Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again
They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.
Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.
What's the deal? -
Point is us not being able to run when it matters has been an ongoing problem.FirePete said:
Dude if you can’t see that other team is also talented. I can’t help you. They were finePostGameOrangeSlices said:Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again
They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.
Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.
What's the deal? -
Eason took one hard hit. I'd say that's a win for the OL. That being said as much talent as this group has the next OL man child that take the field will have a higher ceiling and may be mammoth.
-
That is a GOOD USC D linebananasnblondes said:Our o line has not really been a problem this year. USC's d line is really good.
-
Huff's top recruits are redshirting or redshirt freshman. The ghost of Strausser's recruiting is currently haunting us. Was Strausser a better O Line coach? Probably, but his recruiting was garbage.
-
We ran for 193 yards today.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Point is us not being able to run when it matters has been an ongoing problem.FirePete said:
Dude if you can’t see that other team is also talented. I can’t help you. They were finePostGameOrangeSlices said:Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again
They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.
Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.
What's the deal?
Sure I'd like more, but it isn't as if they stuffed our run all day.
And we won by 2 TDs. -
Yeah but take away Ahmed's runThump said:
We ran for 193 yards today.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Point is us not being able to run when it matters has been an ongoing problem.FirePete said:
Dude if you can’t see that other team is also talented. I can’t help you. They were finePostGameOrangeSlices said:Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again
They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.
Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.
What's the deal?
Sure I'd like more, but it isn't as if they stuffed our run all day.
And we won by 2 TDs.
Kidding
USC d line is legit. One of them was almost ours
I do think we're not as good against a physical D line as we would like -
FTG! @MarlonsBrotherRaceBannon said:
Yeah but take away Ahmed's runThump said:
We ran for 193 yards today.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Point is us not being able to run when it matters has been an ongoing problem.FirePete said:
Dude if you can’t see that other team is also talented. I can’t help you. They were finePostGameOrangeSlices said:Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again
They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.
Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.
What's the deal?
Sure I'd like more, but it isn't as if they stuffed our run all day.
And we won by 2 TDs.
Kidding
USC d line is legit. One of them was almost ours
I do think we're not as good against a physical D line as we would like -
We are not going to steam roll those guys. The OL was ok for most part. Watty lack natural power which is hurting us sometimesRaceBannon said:
Yeah but take away Ahmed's runThump said:
We ran for 193 yards today.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Point is us not being able to run when it matters has been an ongoing problem.FirePete said:
Dude if you can’t see that other team is also talented. I can’t help you. They were finePostGameOrangeSlices said:Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again
They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.
Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.
What's the deal?
Sure I'd like more, but it isn't as if they stuffed our run all day.
And we won by 2 TDs.
Kidding
USC d line is legit. One of them was almost ours
I do think we're not as good against a physical D line as we would like
