Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
PAWZ in answer to your meltdowns from the floor of the House
Comments
-
Instead of telling us how much you hate yourself why not inform us about this important news you've uncovered. No doubt it's a bombshell.CirrhosisDawg said:
You may want to catch up with the news this afternoon GayBob. Thanksgiving is my favorite holiday. You too?SFGbob said:
Wiping the floor with your ignorant ass is my "schtick" I agree, Throbber has been doing a lot of that with you.CirrhosisDawg said:
For some reason, throbber has adopted GayBob’s schtick.ApostleofGrief said:
By "explanation" you are demanding that I defend my position with some kind of cogent argument. But I just told you why it's a waste of time. I don't come here to try to alter your opinions. It's a waste of time for all the reasons I stated. If you actually wanted to have a civil argument -- here? How?PurpleThrobber said:
So you don’t have an explanation. But it’s ok for you to repeatedly post ‘you couldn’t possibly understand.’ApostleofGrief said:
I meant I'd have to construct an argument. I'd write something, and you'd cite some lunatic far right conspiracy theory about Biden. Then I'd have to fight through a set of disingenuous arguments, false dichotomies, red herrings, ad hominem fallacies, not to mention the standby of all Trumpers, the fallacy of ridicule (you attempt to show you are right by laughing)... so it's a waste of time.PurpleThrobber said:
Who’s arguing?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific.
Asking for an explanation isn’t an argument
Unless you don’t or can’t make an explanation based on the facts.
Which is true because it is impossible to gain understanding on a black hole of intellectual expression and logic.
At least be honest about it -
37 genders to choose from and you went there?RaceBannon said:I'm a woman
-
I'm in the party of scienceHHusky said:
37 genders to choose from and you went there?RaceBannon said:I'm a woman
-
That's what I mean, no point in making a real argumentRaceBannon said:
PussyApostleofGrief said:
By "explanation" you are demanding that I defend my position with some kind of cogent argument. But I just told you why it's a waste of time. I don't come here to try to alter your opinions. It's a waste of time for all the reasons I stated. If you actually wanted to have a civil argument -- here? How?PurpleThrobber said:
So you don’t have an explanation. But it’s ok for you to repeatedly post ‘you couldn’t possibly understand.’ApostleofGrief said:
I meant I'd have to construct an argument. I'd write something, and you'd cite some lunatic far right conspiracy theory about Biden. Then I'd have to fight through a set of disingenuous arguments, false dichotomies, red herrings, ad hominem fallacies, not to mention the standby of all Trumpers, the fallacy of ridicule (you attempt to show you are right by laughing)... so it's a waste of time.PurpleThrobber said:
Who’s arguing?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific.
Asking for an explanation isn’t an argument
Unless you don’t or can’t make an explanation based on the facts.
Which is true because it is impossible to gain understanding on a black hole of intellectual expression and logic.
At least be honest about it -
San Francisco GayBob BromidesCirrhosisDawg said:
For some reason, throbber has adoptedApostleofGrief said:
By "explanation" you are demanding that I defend my position with some kind of cogent argument. But I just told you why it's a waste of time. I don't come here to try to alter your opinions. It's a waste of time for all the reasons I stated. If you actually wanted to have a civil argument -- here? How?PurpleThrobber said:
So you don’t have an explanation. But it’s ok for you to repeatedly post ‘you couldn’t possibly understand.’ApostleofGrief said:
I meant I'd have to construct an argument. I'd write something, and you'd cite some lunatic far right conspiracy theory about Biden. Then I'd have to fight through a set of disingenuous arguments, false dichotomies, red herrings, ad hominem fallacies, not to mention the standby of all Trumpers, the fallacy of ridicule (you attempt to show you are right by laughing)... so it's a waste of time.PurpleThrobber said:
Who’s arguing?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific.
Asking for an explanation isn’t an argument
Unless you don’t or can’t make an explanation based on the facts.
Which is true because it is impossible to gain understanding on a black hole of intellectual expression and logic.
At least be honest about itGayBob’s schtick. -
Pussy. You sure throw a lot shit around here for thinking there's no pointApostleofGrief said:
That's what I mean, no point in making a real argumentRaceBannon said:
PussyApostleofGrief said:
By "explanation" you are demanding that I defend my position with some kind of cogent argument. But I just told you why it's a waste of time. I don't come here to try to alter your opinions. It's a waste of time for all the reasons I stated. If you actually wanted to have a civil argument -- here? How?PurpleThrobber said:
So you don’t have an explanation. But it’s ok for you to repeatedly post ‘you couldn’t possibly understand.’ApostleofGrief said:
I meant I'd have to construct an argument. I'd write something, and you'd cite some lunatic far right conspiracy theory about Biden. Then I'd have to fight through a set of disingenuous arguments, false dichotomies, red herrings, ad hominem fallacies, not to mention the standby of all Trumpers, the fallacy of ridicule (you attempt to show you are right by laughing)... so it's a waste of time.PurpleThrobber said:
Who’s arguing?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific.
Asking for an explanation isn’t an argument
Unless you don’t or can’t make an explanation based on the facts.
Which is true because it is impossible to gain understanding on a black hole of intellectual expression and logic.
At least be honest about it
-
Right, both that I amuse myself pissing you off and agree, no point.RaceBannon said:
Pussy. You sure throw a lot shit around here for thinking there's no pointApostleofGrief said:
That's what I mean, no point in making a real argumentRaceBannon said:
PussyApostleofGrief said:
By "explanation" you are demanding that I defend my position with some kind of cogent argument. But I just told you why it's a waste of time. I don't come here to try to alter your opinions. It's a waste of time for all the reasons I stated. If you actually wanted to have a civil argument -- here? How?PurpleThrobber said:
So you don’t have an explanation. But it’s ok for you to repeatedly post ‘you couldn’t possibly understand.’ApostleofGrief said:
I meant I'd have to construct an argument. I'd write something, and you'd cite some lunatic far right conspiracy theory about Biden. Then I'd have to fight through a set of disingenuous arguments, false dichotomies, red herrings, ad hominem fallacies, not to mention the standby of all Trumpers, the fallacy of ridicule (you attempt to show you are right by laughing)... so it's a waste of time.PurpleThrobber said:
Who’s arguing?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific.
Asking for an explanation isn’t an argument
Unless you don’t or can’t make an explanation based on the facts.
Which is true because it is impossible to gain understanding on a black hole of intellectual expression and logic.
At least be honest about it -
I'll be sure and let you know if you piss me off thenApostleofGrief said:
Right, both that I amuse myself pissing you off and agree, no point.RaceBannon said:
Pussy. You sure throw a lot shit around here for thinking there's no pointApostleofGrief said:
That's what I mean, no point in making a real argumentRaceBannon said:
PussyApostleofGrief said:
By "explanation" you are demanding that I defend my position with some kind of cogent argument. But I just told you why it's a waste of time. I don't come here to try to alter your opinions. It's a waste of time for all the reasons I stated. If you actually wanted to have a civil argument -- here? How?PurpleThrobber said:
So you don’t have an explanation. But it’s ok for you to repeatedly post ‘you couldn’t possibly understand.’ApostleofGrief said:
I meant I'd have to construct an argument. I'd write something, and you'd cite some lunatic far right conspiracy theory about Biden. Then I'd have to fight through a set of disingenuous arguments, false dichotomies, red herrings, ad hominem fallacies, not to mention the standby of all Trumpers, the fallacy of ridicule (you attempt to show you are right by laughing)... so it's a waste of time.PurpleThrobber said:
Who’s arguing?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific.
Asking for an explanation isn’t an argument
Unless you don’t or can’t make an explanation based on the facts.
Which is true because it is impossible to gain understanding on a black hole of intellectual expression and logic.
At least be honest about it -
Behold, the “real” argumentApostleofGrief said:
San Francisco GayBob BromidesCirrhosisDawg said:
For some reason, throbber has adoptedApostleofGrief said:
By "explanation" you are demanding that I defend my position with some kind of cogent argument. But I just told you why it's a waste of time. I don't come here to try to alter your opinions. It's a waste of time for all the reasons I stated. If you actually wanted to have a civil argument -- here? How?PurpleThrobber said:
So you don’t have an explanation. But it’s ok for you to repeatedly post ‘you couldn’t possibly understand.’ApostleofGrief said:
I meant I'd have to construct an argument. I'd write something, and you'd cite some lunatic far right conspiracy theory about Biden. Then I'd have to fight through a set of disingenuous arguments, false dichotomies, red herrings, ad hominem fallacies, not to mention the standby of all Trumpers, the fallacy of ridicule (you attempt to show you are right by laughing)... so it's a waste of time.PurpleThrobber said:
Who’s arguing?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific.
Asking for an explanation isn’t an argument
Unless you don’t or can’t make an explanation based on the facts.
Which is true because it is impossible to gain understanding on a black hole of intellectual expression and logic.
At least be honest about itGayBob’s schtick. -
Only two. But you can call yourself whatever you want.HHusky said:
37 genders to choose from and you went there?RaceBannon said:I'm a woman
