Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
PAWZ in answer to your meltdowns from the floor of the House
Comments
-
Says the Kunt who can never back up her mouth.HustlinOwl said:
Says the crown prince of white flag wavers.SFGbob said:
I don't know if you are or if you aren't an anti-vaxxer that appears to have been a discussion that took place long before I got here but I know now whenever I see him reference it, it's a white flag, no different than when Hondo starts talking about Pizzagate and Benghazi.pawz said:
I win.TheKobeStopper said:
Said the anti vaxxer.pawz said:
Holy Christ, if you're the product of our education system, my kids are OUT!ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
You lose.
Again.
#marketplaceofideas #fullyvaxxed #saddayforapag -
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific. -
Who’s arguing?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific.
Asking for an explanation isn’t an argument
Unless you don’t or can’t make an explanation based on the facts. -
Dude are you really that oblivious to your own act?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific. -
Ironic.SFGbob said:
Dude are you really that oblivious to your own act?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific. -
Let’s bump this to keep things focused on getting an explanation.PurpleThrobber said:
Who’s arguing?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific.
Asking for an explanation isn’t an argument
Unless you don’t or can’t make an explanation based on the facts. -
I meant I'd have to construct an argument. I'd write something, and you'd cite some lunatic far right conspiracy theory about Biden. Then I'd have to fight through a set of disingenuous arguments, false dichotomies, red herrings, ad hominem fallacies, not to mention the standby of all Trumpers, the fallacy of ridicule (you attempt to show you are right by laughing)... so it's a waste of time.PurpleThrobber said:
Who’s arguing?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific.
Asking for an explanation isn’t an argument
Unless you don’t or can’t make an explanation based on the facts. -
Sure Mr. Unicorn farts.ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific. -
What a load of crap. Purple leans right but his arguments are not disingenuous. Why not just admit that your argument are usually very weak and easily rebutted and you have a hard time refuting what people have said so you fall back on this pathetic dodge that your critics are engaging in disingenuous arguments?ApostleofGrief said:
I meant I'd have to construct an argument. I'd write something, and you'd cite some lunatic far right conspiracy theory about Biden. Then I'd have to fight through a set of disingenuous arguments, false dichotomies, red herrings, ad hominem fallacies, not to mention the standby of all Trumpers, the fallacy of ridicule (you attempt to show you are right by laughing)... so it's a waste of time.PurpleThrobber said:
Who’s arguing?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific.
Asking for an explanation isn’t an argument
Unless you don’t or can’t make an explanation based on the facts.
-
How is it a lunatic far right conspiracy theory when we have Biden on video bragging about threatening to withhold $1B if the prosecutor investigating his Son's company isn't fired?ApostleofGrief said:
I meant I'd have to construct an argument. I'd write something, and you'd cite some lunatic far right conspiracy theory about Biden. Then I'd have to fight through a set of disingenuous arguments, false dichotomies, red herrings, ad hominem fallacies, not to mention the standby of all Trumpers, the fallacy of ridicule (you attempt to show you are right by laughing)... so it's a waste of time.PurpleThrobber said:
Who’s arguing?ApostleofGrief said:
The problem is you can always make an argument. The nazis had arguments to back up what they did, and they believed they were doing the right thing. I'm not calling you a nazi and not twisting, just making an analogy. There is no point in making arguments with you since you see the world in a way that is so irrationally biased, it's just a waste of time. Sometimes I post here just to see what insane arguments the lunatic far right has. It's more like an observation. I'm not going to argue with crazy.PurpleThrobber said:
No. You won’t try at all. Because you have no answer other than the tired ‘you just won’t understand’ angle.ApostleofGrief said:
I'd try, but your mind is so badly warped from far right lunatic fringe foxnews stuff it would be uselessPurpleThrobber said:
Same question as of typhus boy that was never answered; what’s the high crime?ApostleofGrief said:Just to clarify pawz threw a meltdown after I rightly accused the idiot president of treason on this trash bored -- but it's being said on the floor of the House! Now he seems to be changing the subject.
Exposing a corrupt former VP is attempting to undermine the sovereignty or government of the United States??? Explain that to me.
Try me. Go ahead and explain it.
Last time I watched Fox News was about 2001. I watch CNBC and read. TV news is horrific.
Asking for an explanation isn’t an argument
Unless you don’t or can’t make an explanation based on the facts.
It's on tape.
In front of the Council on Foreign Relations.
